Dongamanti Ashok1, Pamula Chiranjeevi1, Aamate Vikas Kumar1, Madderla Sarasija2, Vagolu Siva Krishna3, Dharmarajan Sriram3, Sridhar Balasubramanian4. 1. Green and Medicinal Chemistry Lab, Department of Chemistry, Osmania University Hyderabad-500 007 Telangana State India ashokdou@gmail.com. 2. Department of Chemistry, Satavahana University Karimnagar-505001 Telangana State India. 3. Department of Pharmacy, Birla Institute of Technology & Science - Pilani Hyderabad Campus, Jawahar Nagar Hyderabad-500 078 Telangana State India. 4. X-ray Crystallography Division, CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Technology Hyderabad-500 007 India.
Tuberculosis, the world's most chronic infectious disease caused by single infectious agent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), claimed the lives of over 1.3 million people worldwide in 2016, which ranks above HIV/AIDS.[1] The current therapy of TB with first-line and second-line drugs are around 50 years old and moreover, it requires longer duration for the treatment.[2] Patients often fail to complete the therapy due to drug side effects and the complexity of the drug regimen, leading to the emergence of multidrug resistant TB (MDR-TB), extensively drug resistant TB (XDR-TB) and totally drug resistant TB (TDR-TB).[3] Additionally, the resurgence in TB is alarming due to the development of pathogenic synergy with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).[4-6] Although TB drug development has made substantial progress in the past decade and different drug classes are in development, there is still a need of novel potent chemical entities provided with promising antimycobacterial activities.[7]Chromene (benzopyran), an important class of benzo-fused oxaheterocycles is an integral part of many bioactive compounds exhibiting a wide range of biological properties including anti-HIV,[8-10] anticancer,[11,12] antimicrobial,[13,14] antitumor,[15] antiviral,[16] anti-inflammatory[17] and antioxidant[18] activities. Among naturally occurring chromene heterocycles, molecules like dehydrolupinifolinol (I), eriosemaone A (II), karanjachromene (III), (+)-calanolide A (IV) and benzofuro-chromene (V) were reported as anti-tubercular agents (Fig. 1).[19-22] On the other hand, synthesis of triazole-fused compounds approached through click reaction continues to fascinate the attention of chemists, in a bid to identify molecules with enhanced pharmacological properties.[23] Moreover, compounds consisting 1,2,3-triazole ring fused with various carbocyclic moieties exhibited remarkable biological activities, e.g., 1,2,3-triazolo[1,5-a]quinoxaline possess good affinity toward benzodiazepine and adenosine receptors[24,25] and the morpholine-fused triazole is efficient γ-secretase modulator (GSM) for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.[26] Additionally, 1,2,3-triazoles conjugated with different sorts of heterocyclic moieties were reported to exhibit potent anti-tubercular activity (VI–XI) (Fig. 2).[27-30]
Fig. 1
Chromene based inhibitors reported as antimycobacterial agents.
Fig. 2
1,2,3-Triazole based inhibitors reported as antimycobacterial agents.
Therefore the triazole-fused structural motifs became increasingly common in pharmaceutical targets and in a wide array of bioactive molecules such as chemotherapeutic A,[31] antibacterial B[32] and cardiovascular C[33] agents (Fig. 3). Inspired by the frequent occurrence of 1,2,3-triazole or chromene framework in various biologically active anti-tubercular agents and in continuation to our ongoing efforts[34,35] in exploiting the biological significance of 1,2,3-triazole nuclei fused with various carbocyclic frameworks, we anticipated that integration of these two frameworks in a single molecule may provide truly effective lead structures (Fig. 4) and they are further evaluated against the Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv strain. To the best of our knowledge, synthesis and antimycobacterial activities of these 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromene conjugates are unprecedented.
Fig. 3
Fused triazoles as potential drug candidates.
Fig. 4
Design of novel 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromenes as possible antimycobacterial agents.
Results and discussion
Chemistry
The strategy adopted for synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromene scaffolds, is depicted in Scheme 1. In the first step, Kabbe condensation of substituted acetophenones 1a–c with 1,4-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-8-one 2, in the presence of pyrrolidine gave corresponding dispiro[chromane-2,1′-cyclohexane-4′,2′′-[1,3]dioxolan]-4-ones 3a–c.[36,37] Subsequently, these were subjected to reduction using sodium borohydride (NaBH4) to afford the spirochromanols 4a–c.[38] The following spirochromanols 4a–c on deprotection and dehydration with excess 6 N HCl provided the corresponding spirochromene 5a–c.[39,40] Thus obtained spirochromenes 5a–c on [3 + 2] Huisgen cycloaddition using a catalytic amount of pyrrolidine, with various aryl azides 6a–e,[41] furnished 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromene scaffolds 7a–o in low to moderate yields (Scheme 1 & Fig. 5).[42,43]
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromenes.
Fig. 5
1,2,3-Triazole fused spirochromenes with isolated yields.
The synthesized 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromene scaffolds were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass and FTIR spectral analysis; X-ray diffractometry confirmed the structure of compound 7a (CCDC 1820092†)[44] as shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6
A view of KA357, showing the atom-labelling scheme of compound 7a. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level and H atoms are represented by circles of arbitrary radii.
Anti-tubercular assay
In vitro MTB screening
Our fifteen compound library was screened for in vitro anti-tubercular activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv using Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA) for the determination of MIC (the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that will inhibit the visible growth of a bacteria after overnight incubation).[45] Upon investigation of anti-tubercular activity data (Table 1), it was revealed that all the synthesized 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromene scaffolds (7a–o) were found to possess moderate to high inhibitory activity.
Anti-tubercular and toxicity evaluation of 7a–o against M. tuberculosis H37Rva
Compounds
MIC (μg mL−1)
MIC (μM)
Cytotoxicity in % inhibition at 50 μg mL−1
7a*
1.56
4.74
30.23
7b
>25
75.80
ND
7c
12.5
34.43
ND
7d*
1.56
4.34
33.14
7e
>25
75.80
ND
7f
6.25
17.90
21.41
7g
25
68.87
ND
7h
25
65.27
ND
7i*
1.56
4.11
29.36
7j
12.5
34.43
ND
7k*
3.125
8.60
24.90
7l
>25
68.96
ND
7m*
3.125
7.87
24.76
7n
6.25
15.90
22.64
7o
25
66.31
ND
Isoniazid
0.055
0.437
ND
Rifampicin
0.411
0.50
ND
Ethambutol
1.56
7.64
ND
* Represent more active compounds; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration (the lowest concentration that inhibited the bacterial growth). MIC values are interpreted as an average of duplicates. ND = not determined.
* Represent more active compounds; MIC: minimum inhibitory concentration (the lowest concentration that inhibited the bacterial growth). MIC values are interpreted as an average of duplicates. ND = not determined.As observed from Table 1, the tested compounds showed antimycobacterial activity with MIC values between 4.11 and 75.80 μM. Out of the various compounds tested, compounds 7a, 7c, 7d, 7f, 7i, 7j, 7k, 7m and 7n with MIC values varying from 4.11 to 50.40 μM possess more inhibitory efficiency compared to that of standard pyrazinamide (MIC = 50.77 μM). Compounds 7a, 7d and 7i were found to possess excellent potency i.e. 4.74 μM, 4.34 μM and 4.11 μM respectively, while compounds 7k (8.6 μM) and 7m (7.67 μM) were close as compared to first line anti-tubercular drug ethambutol (MIC = 7.64 μM). However, all the compounds exhibited lower inhibitory efficiency compared to isoniazid (MIC = 0.437 μM) and rifampicin (MIC = 0.5 μM).
In vitro cytotoxicity screening
As a result, the compounds 7a, 7d, 7f, 7i, 7k, 7m and 7n exhibited good in vitro antimycobacterial potency and were further evaluated for their toxicity in a RAW 264.7 cell line at a concentration of 50 μg mL−1 using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay.[46] The most promising anti-TB compounds 7a, 7d and 7i showed 30.23, 33.14 and 29.36% cytotoxicity, respectively.
Experimental
All the reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial sources. Reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel plates (60 F254), visualization done by exposing to iodine vapour and ultraviolet light. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (60–120 mesh) using distilled hexane, acetone. 1H NMR (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) spectra were recorded in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solvents by using Bruker Avance II 400 spectrometer. Proton chemical shifts (δ) are relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS, δ = 0.00) as internal standard and expressed in ppm. Spin multiplicities are given as s (singlet), d (doublet), dd (doublet of doublet), td (triplet of doublet) and m (multiplet). Coupling constants (J) are given in hertz. Mass spectra were recorded on GCMS-QP 1000 EX mass spectrometer. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu FT-IR-8400s spectrometer. Melting points were determined using melting point apparatus and are uncorrected.
General procedure for the synthesis of compound (3a–c)
To a solution of 1,4-dioxaspiro[4.5]decan-8-one (2) (156 mg, 1 mmol) in dry ethanol, a catalytic amount of pyrrolidine was added followed by a substituted 2′-hydroxyacetophenones (1a–c) (1 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated under reflux for 8–10 h with constant stirring. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the residue was dissolved in ethyl acetate. The mixture was washed with a 1 M aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid, with a 1 M aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and brine. The organic extracts were dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting crude product was purified by column chromatography (eluent: PE/acetone mixtures of increasing polarity) to obtain the compounds 6,7-substituted dispiro[chromane-2,1′-cyclohexane-4′,2′′-[1,3]dioxolan]-4-ones (3a–c) as white solids.
General procedure for the synthesis of compound (4a–c)
To a stirred suspension of sodium borohydride (37.83 mg, 1 mmol) in MeOH, a solution of 6,7-substituted dispiro[chromane-2,1′-cyclohexane-4′,2′′-[1,3]dioxolan]-4-ones (3a–c) (1 mmol) in MeOH was added drop wise at 0 °C through an addition funnel. The resulting mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature for 1 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo, poured into ice and saturated NaHCO3 aqueous solution and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organics were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, and concentrated in vacuo to give 6,7-substituted dispiro[chromane-2,1′-cyclohexane-4′,2′′-[1,3]dioxolan]-4-ols (4a–c) as white solids.
General procedure for the synthesis of compound (5a–c)
In a round bottom flask the previous spiro compounds (4a–c) dissolved in acetone was taken. To this solution excess amount of 6 N HCl was added at room temperature. The reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature until the ketal has consumed totally (monitored by TLC). After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was slowly quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 until pH 7 was reached. The solution was diluted with ethyl acetate. The phases were separated and the aqueous phase was back-extracted with ethyl acetate twice. The combined organic phases were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated under reduce pressure. The crude material was purified by flash chromatography (PE/acetones as the eluents). The corresponding fractions were combined and concentrated under reduce pressure yielding 6,7-substituted spiro[chromene-2,1′-cyclohexan]-4′-ones (5a–c) as white solids.
General procedure for the synthesis of compound (7a–o)
The catalyst pyrrolidine (0.1 mmol) was added to a solution of aryl azides 6a–e (0.5 mmol) and compound 5a–c (1 mmol) in DMSO and the reaction mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 24 h. The completion of the reaction was confirmed by TLC (PE/EtOAc 5 : 2). The crude product was purified by column chromatography on silica gel, eluting with PE/acetone (10 : 1 to 4 : 1), to afford the desired products 7a–o as white solids.
Antimycobacterial activity
In vitro MTB MABA assay
Briefly, the inoculum was prepared from fresh LJ medium re-suspended in 7H9-S medium (7H9 broth, 0.1% casitone, 0.5% glycerol, supplemented oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase [OADC]), adjusted to a McFarland tube no. 1, and diluted 1 : 20; 100 μL was used as inoculum. Each drug stock solution was thawed and diluted in 7H9-S at four-fold the final highest concentration tested. Serial two-fold dilutions of each drug were prepared directly in a sterile 96-well microtiter plate using 100 μL 7H9-S. A growth control containing no antibiotic and a sterile control were also prepared on each plate. Sterile water was added to all perimetre wells to avoid evaporation during the incubation. The plate was covered, sealed in plastic bags and incubated at 37 °C in normal atmosphere. After 7 days incubation, 30 μL of alamar blue solution was added to each well, and the plate was re-incubated overnight. A change in colour from blue (oxidised state) to pink (reduced) indicated the growth of bacteria, and the MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of drug that prevented this change in colour.[45]*Standards INH & amp; RIF (0.437 & amp; 0.5 μM).The in vitro cytotoxicity of the privileged anti-tubercular active analogues with lower MIC value were assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay against growth inhibition of RAW 264.7 cells (obtained from National Centre for Cell Science, Pune) at 50 μg mL−1 concentration.[29] Cell lines were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator (Thermo Scientific). Detached the adhered cells and followed by centrifugation to get cell pellet. Fresh media was added to the pellet to make a cell count using haemocytometer and plate 100 μL of media with cells ranging from 5000–6000 per well in a 96-well plate. The plate was incubated overnight in CO2 incubator for the cells to adhere and regain its shape. After 24 h cells were treated with the test compounds at 25 μM diluted using the media to deduce the percentage inhibition on human normal cells. The cells were incubated for 48 h to assay the effect of the test compounds on different cell lines. Zero hour reading was noted down with untreated cells and also control with 1% DMSO to subtract further from the 48 h reading. After 48 h incubation, cells were treated by MTT ((4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) dissolved in PBS (5 mg mL−1) and incubated for 3–4 h at 37 °C. The formazan crystals thus formed were dissolved in 100 μL of DMSO and the viability was measured at 540 nm on a multimode reader (Spectra max). The values were further calculated for percentage inhibition which in turn helps us to know the cytotoxicity of the test compounds.[46]
Crystallographic data
X-ray data for the compound 7a (KA357) was collected at room temperature on a Bruker D8 QUEST instrument with an IμS Mo microsource (λ = 0.7107 Å) and a PHOTON-100 detector. The raw data frames were reduced and corrected for absorption effects using the Bruker Apex 3 software suite programs.[47] The structure was solved using intrinsic phasing method[47] and further refined with the SHELXL[48] program and expanded using Fourier techniques. Anisotropic displacement parameters were included for all non-hydrogen atoms. All C bound H atoms were positioned geometrically and treated as riding on their parent C atoms [C–H = 0.93–0.97 Å, and Uiso(H) = 1.5Ueq.(C) for methyl H or 1.2Ueq.(C) for other H atoms].
Crystal data for KA357
C21H19N3O (M = 329.40 g mol−1): monoclinic, space group P21/n (no. 14), a = 12.29074(14) Å, b = 6.54998(8) Å, c = 21.8593(3) Å, β = 106.2989(5)°, V = 1689.04(4) Å3, Z = 4, T = 294.15 K, μ(Mo Kα) = 0.082 mm−1, Dcalc = 1.2953 g cm−3, 23 247 reflections measured (4.42° ≤ 2Θ ≤ 61.14°), 5166 unique (Rint = 0.0288, Rsigma = 0.0248) which were used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0560 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.1638 (all data). CCDC 1820092 contains supplementary crystallographic data for the structure.†
In conclusion, a series of 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromene motifs were synthesized for the first time in four steps via [3 + 2] Huisgen cycloaddition starting from 2-hydroxy acetophenone and all these new compounds were confirmed by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, IR and MS spectra. The single X-ray diffraction study was used to confirm the molecular structure of a representative compound 7a unambiguously. The in vitro antimycobacterial evaluation showed that most of the synthesized 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromenes exhibited moderate to good antimycobacterial activity. Noticeably, compounds 7a, 7d and 7i most potent compound in vitro with MIC of 1.56 μg, against MTB. These findings demonstrated that 1,2,3-triazole-fused spirochromenes have biological significance; further optimization of these identified hits as well as structural modifications are in progress in order to enhance the efficacy against M. tuberculosis.
Authors: Chad W Brown; Shengquan Liu; Jozef Klucik; K Darrell Berlin; Patrick J Brennan; Devinder Kaur; Doris M Benbrook Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-02-12 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Lara S Kallander; Qing Lu; Wenfang Chen; Thaddeus Tomaszek; Guang Yang; David Tew; Thomas D Meek; Glenn A Hofmann; Christina K Schulz-Pritchard; Ward W Smith; Cheryl A Janson; M Dominic Ryan; Gui-Feng Zhang; Kyung O Johanson; Robert B Kirkpatrick; Thau F Ho; Paul W Fisher; Michael R Mattern; Randall K Johnson; Michael J Hansbury; James D Winkler; Keith W Ward; Daniel F Veber; Scott K Thompson Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2005-09-08 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Nubia Boechat; Vitor F Ferreira; Sabrina B Ferreira; Maria de Lourdes G Ferreira; Fernando de C da Silva; Monica M Bastos; Marilia Dos S Costa; Maria Cristina S Lourenço; Angelo C Pinto; Antoniana U Krettli; Anna Caroline Aguiar; Brunno M Teixeira; Nathalia V da Silva; Priscila R C Martins; Flavio Augusto F M Bezerra; Ane Louise S Camilo; Gerson P da Silva; Carolina C P Costa Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2011-08-15 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: M T Flavin; J D Rizzo; A Khilevich; A Kucherenko; A K Sheinkman; V Vilaychack; L Lin; W Chen; E M Greenwood; T Pengsuparp; J M Pezzuto; S H Hughes; T M Flavin; M Cibulski; W A Boulanger; R L Shone; Z Q Xu Journal: J Med Chem Date: 1996-03-15 Impact factor: 7.446