Literature DB >> 35539343

Heterogeneous Co-catalyzed direct 2-alkylation of azoles with ethers.

Ke Yang1, Dashan Li1, Lei Zhang1, Qun Chen1, Tiandi Tang1.   

Abstract

The direct 2-alkylation of oxazoles and thiazoles with ethers through cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction using Co-containing mesoporous zeolite ETS-10 as the heterogeneous catalyst is described. The basic Co-containing mesoporous zeolite ETS-10 catalyst facilitates this cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction through metal-base synergy catalytic principle. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 35539343      PMCID: PMC9079782          DOI: 10.1039/c8ra01796d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RSC Adv        ISSN: 2046-2069            Impact factor:   3.361


Transition metal-catalyzed C–H bond functionalization reaction has become one of the most efficient methods for selective C–C and C–X bond formation in synthetic chemistry.[1] Current primarily transition metal-catalyzed C–H bond functionalization reactions rely on homogeneous metal catalysts, in most cases, which also need extra basic or acidic additives and catalyst ligands.[2] Recently, considerable efforts have been devoted to heterogeneous catalysis,[3] because heterogeneous transition metal catalysts not only provide easy product-catalyst separation and catalyst recycling features, but also afford additional important active sites through support materials in C–H bond functionalization. It is noteworthy that zeolites are crystalline porous support materials with good chemical and thermal stability. Especially, the unique frameworks of zeolites present basic or acidic properties in catalytic performance, which have been widely used in the organic transformations.[4] Therefore, developing novel heterogeneous metal catalysts by using zeolites would be of prime synthetic value. 2-Substituted azoles are widely present in biological activities compounds, pharmaceuticals and organic functional materials.[5] Most current methods for accessing 2-alkylazoles depend on the transition metal-catalyzed direct C-2-alkylation of azoles with alkylating reagents under basic conditions.[6] However, the convenient and straightforward approach using non-functionalized ethers as alkylating reagents through cross-dehydrogenative coupling is still rare.[7] Very recently, Lu and Li group also demonstrated the cobalt-catalyzed cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction of oxazoles and ethers.[7] It still suffered from certain limitations such as the restricted use of relatively harsh reaction conditions. One possible reason is that the cobalt catalyst is incompatible with base. For this reason, we believe that exploring the suitable bases could benefit this reaction. Mesoporous zeolite ETS-10 has a three-dimensional 12-membered ring network and possesses relatively strong Lewis basicity. The basic characteristic is related to its framework that comprises corner sharing TiO62− octahedra and SiO4 tetrahedra as building units. In this manner, each TiO6 unit contributes two negative charges that are compensated by extra-framework cations (Na+ and K+).[8] Considering the unique framework architectures and chemical compositions of zeolite ETS-10, we envisioned basic zeolite ETS-10 supported metal catalysts might facilitate this cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction through metal-base synergy catalytic principle. Herein, we report the first example of Co-containing mesoporous zeolite ETS-10 catalyzed 2-alkylation of azoles with ethers through the cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction. We began our study with the preparation of 3 wt% Co-containing basic mesoporous zeolite ETS-10 (Co/METS-10). For comparison, 3 wt% Co-containing acidic mesoporous ZSM-5 (Co/MZSM-5) was also tested in this catalytic cycle. The cross-dehydrogenative coupling reaction of benzoxazole 1a and tetrahydrofuran 2a with Co/METS-10 was carried out in the presence of tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP, 5.0–6.0 M in n-decane) at 100 °C under the N2 atmosphere, and the desired product 2-(tetrahydrofuran-2-yl)benzo[d]oxazole 3a could be obtained in 80% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Then acidic Co/MZSM-5 was examined in our reaction, however, this acidic heterogeneous catalyst Co/MZSM-5 was not compatible with our reaction system, indicating that the acidic support material MZSM-5 cannot promote this process (Table 1, entry 2). We also found that the yield of 3a was decreased using the reported CoCO3 catalyst under relatively mild conditions (Table 1, entry 3). Furthermore, basic mesoporous Cu/METS-10, Fe/METS-10 and Ni/METS-10 were also prepared to investigate in our catalytic cycle, and the results demonstrated that Co/METS-10 exhibited the higher catalytic efficiency, indicating that Co/METS-10 is the optimal catalyst (Table 1, entries 4–6). After that, replacement of TBHP with other additives, such as K2S2O8, 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ), di-tert-butyl peroxide (DTBP), dicumyl peroxide (DCP), benzoyl peroxide (BPO) and t-BuOOBz, caused either the low yield of desired product 3a or no reaction, suggesting that THBP is the optimal additives (Table 1, entries 7–12). In addition, no desired product 3a was detected in absence of additives (Table 1, entry 13). Finally, only 20% yield of 3a was examined when cobalt catalyst was absent in this process (Table 1, entry 14).

Optimization of reaction conditionsa

EntryCatalystAdditivesYield (%)b
1Co/METS-10 (5 mol%)TBHP82 (80)c
2Co/MZSM-5 (5 mol%)TBHP35
3CoCO3 (5 mol%)TBHP56
4Cu/METS-10 (5 mol%)TBHP50
5Fe/METS-10 (5 mol%)TBHP65
6Ni/METS-10 (5 mol%)TBHP38
7Co/METS-10 (5 mol%)K2S2O80
8Co/METS-10 (5 mol%)DDQ0
9Co/METS-10 (5 mol%)DTBPTrace
10Co/METS-10 (5 mol%)DCP0
11Co/METS-10 (5 mol%)BPO42
12Co/METS-10 (5 mol%) t-BuOOBz60
13Co/METS-10 (5 mol%)0
14TBHP20

Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (2.5 mL), 5 mol% metal in catalyst, additives (0.4 mmol), 100 °C, 24 h, N2, yield.

Yields are based on 1a, determined by crude 1H NMR using dibromomethane as the internal standard.

Isolated yield.

Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (2.5 mL), 5 mol% metal in catalyst, additives (0.4 mmol), 100 °C, 24 h, N2, yield. Yields are based on 1a, determined by crude 1H NMR using dibromomethane as the internal standard. Isolated yield. With the optimized conditions in hand, a substrate scope study of azole moiety was carried out firstly (Table 2). As we expected, the current catalytic system proceeded in good yields for the substituted benzoxazoles (3b–g). Both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups on the phenyl ring were tolerated in this catalytic cycle. Moreover, employing di-substituted oxazole 1h as the coupling partner, the desired product 3h was isolated in moderate yield. Besides, the scope study of aliphatic ethers was also tested in our cobalt catalysis system. Both linear aliphatic ethers and cyclic aliphatic ethers could be used to prepare the corresponding products in moderate to good yields (3i–m). Next, we sought the substrate scope study of thiazoles and aliphatic ethers in the presence of basic Co/METS-10 catalyst. As shown in Table 3, different substituted benzo[d]thiazoles generated the desired products in good yield (5a–e). Furthermore, different kinds of aliphatic ethers were also well tolerated in this catalytic cycle (5f–j).

Scope of oxazoles and ethersa

Conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (2.5 mL), 3 wt% Co/METS-10 (5 mol%, 20 mg), TBHP (0.4 mmol), 100 °C, 24 h, N2, Isolated yield.

Scope of thiazoles and ethersa

Conditions: 4 (0.2 mmol), 2 (2.5 mL), 3 wt% Co/METS-10 (5 mol%, 20 mg), TBHP (0.4 mmol), 100 °C, 24 h, N2, Isolated yield.

Conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (2.5 mL), 3 wt% Co/METS-10 (5 mol%, 20 mg), TBHP (0.4 mmol), 100 °C, 24 h, N2, Isolated yield. Conditions: 4 (0.2 mmol), 2 (2.5 mL), 3 wt% Co/METS-10 (5 mol%, 20 mg), TBHP (0.4 mmol), 100 °C, 24 h, N2, Isolated yield. In order to provide some insights into the possible mechanism, a series of control experiments were carried out. The radical trapping experiment was firstly performed, which was found that the addition of TEMPO inhibited this reaction (Scheme 1a). It suggests that this reaction may be involving a radical pathway. Next, the investigations of TBHP and tetrahydrofuran with or without Co/METS-10 catalyst using TEMPO as a radical trapping reagent were also performed (Scheme 1b). In the presence of Co/ETS-10, the alkyl radical trapping product 6 could be isolated in 89% yield when 2.0 equivalent of TBHP was added. It suggests that Co/METS-10 catalyst may play an important role in the process of alkyl radical generation.[9] Moreover, some intermolecular H/D exchange of azole (9% D) was observed when additional D2O was added in reaction system, suggesting a metal-mediated C–H bond cleavage process is involved (see Scheme S1 in ESI†). Finally, the intermolecular competition experiment was also carried out, indicating that electron density in phenyl rings of azoles does not affect the reaction rate (Scheme 2).
Scheme 1

The radical trapping experiments.

Scheme 2

The intermolecular competition experiment.

To gain further insight into this reaction mechanism, the electron state and the location as well as the dispersion of the Co species in the Co/METS-10 catalyst were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques, respectively (see Fig. S1–S3 in ESI†). The results indicate that the CoII species are highly dispersed in the micropore and mesoporous channels of the Co/METS-10 catalyst (the details are described in the ESI†). On the basis of above results and the previous literatures,[7] the following plausible mechanistic pathway has been proposed in Scheme 3. It is believed that the Co(ii)/METS-10 catalyst is transformed to the Co(iii)/METS-10 in the presence of TBHP via a SET process with producing the corresponding t-BuO radical.[10] Then alkyl radical B can be generated through t-BuO radical abstracts hydrogen atoms from 2a. The metallization of 1a in the presence of Co(iii)/METS-10 provides the CoIII intermediate A, and subsequent oxidative addition of the radical B gives the CoIV intermediate C,[11] leading to the desired product 3a and regeneration of Co(ii)/METS-10 catalyst through reductive elimination.
Scheme 3

A plausible catalytic cycle.

To probe the recyclability of the Co/METS-10 catalyst in this process, five round consecutive reactions of 1a with 2a were carried out under the recovered catalyst. We discovered that the catalytic activity of Co/METS-10 slightly decreased after five consecutive rounds with 75% NMR yield (Scheme 4).
Scheme 4

The Co/METS-10 catalyst recyclability experiments.

Conclusions

In summary, we have developed an efficient basic Co-containing mesoporous zeolite ETS-10 catalyzed direct 2-alkylation of azoles with aliphatic ethers. This transformation is the first example of cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions through a basic heterogeneous Co/METS-10 catalyst. This catalytic system tolerates a variety of functional groups with good yields. Furthermore, this novel method provides an important complementary approach to access the important bioactive 2-alkylated azoles derivatives.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.
  45 in total

1.  Nickel- and cobalt-catalyzed direct alkylation of azoles with N-tosylhydrazones bearing unactivated alkyl groups.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Yao; Koji Hirano; Tetsuya Satoh; Masahiro Miura
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Catalytic C-H bond functionalisation chemistry: the case for quasi-heterogeneous catalysis.

Authors:  Alan J Reay; Ian J S Fairlamb
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Ag-catalyzed C-H/C-C bond functionalization.

Authors:  Qing-Zhong Zheng; Ning Jiao
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Heterogeneously catalyzed direct C-H thiolation of heteroarenes.

Authors:  Suhelen Vásquez-Céspedes; Angélique Ferry; Lisa Candish; Frank Glorius
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 5.  A Simple and Versatile Amide Directing Group for C-H Functionalizations.

Authors:  Ru-Yi Zhu; Marcus E Farmer; Yan-Qiao Chen; Jin-Quan Yu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Cobalt-Catalyzed Cross-Dehydrogenative Coupling Reactions of (Benz)oxazoles with Ethers.

Authors:  Yanrong Li; Mengshi Wang; Wei Fan; Fen Qian; Guigen Li; Hongjian Lu
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.354

7.  Copper- or Nickel-Enabled Oxidative Cross-Coupling of Unreactive C(sp3)-H Bonds with Azole C(sp2)-H Bonds: Rapid Access to β-Azolyl Propanoic Acid Derivatives.

Authors:  Guangying Tan; Luoqiang Zhang; Xingrong Liao; Yang Shi; Yimin Wu; Yudong Yang; Jingsong You
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 6.005

Review 8.  Recently reported biological activities of pyrazole compounds.

Authors:  Jéssica Venância Faria; Percilene Fazolin Vegi; Ana Gabriella Carvalho Miguita; Maurício Silva Dos Santos; Nubia Boechat; Alice Maria Rolim Bernardino
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 9.  Palladium(II)-catalyzed C-H activation/C-C cross-coupling reactions: versatility and practicality.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Keary M Engle; Dong-Hui Wang; Jin-Quan Yu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

10.  Cobalt-catalysed site-selective intra- and intermolecular dehydrogenative amination of unactivated sp(3) carbons.

Authors:  Xuesong Wu; Ke Yang; Yan Zhao; Hao Sun; Guigen Li; Haibo Ge
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.