Literature DB >> 3553785

[Effect of forced respiration on the stress on puncture channels of sutures in transverse laparotomies of the upper abdomen; experimental studies in the anesthesized dog].

N Hahn, M Klefisch, W Eichelkraut.   

Abstract

In 11 mongrel dogs in propiophenylpromazine-pentobarbital-anaesthesia the influence of forced respiration on the load of puncture channels of a suture was investigated. For this horizontal suture in the upper abdominal wall, threads No. 3 USP and round needles No. ECT-4 were used. The experiments were carried out in supine position with stretched hindlegs, in supine position with relaxed hindlegs, in lateral position, and in hanging abdominal position. Measurements were performed with a selfconstructed resistance strain gauge element. Rising forced respiration pressure increased the inspiratory load of puncture channels, but there were no significant differences between spontaneous breathing and forced respiration with pressure of 10 cm H2O. In contrary to this there were highly significant differences between spontaneous breathing and forced respiration with pressure of 20 and 30 cm H2O (multiple variance analysis). For instance the load during forced respiration with a pressure of 30 cm H2O in supine position with relaxed hindlegs rose about 67% above pressure values of spontaneous breathing. It could be shown that the expiratory load in the puncture channels was not influenced by forced respiration pressure, but depended on the body position; in dogs it was minimal in side position (45-48 g), higher in supine position with relaxed hindlegs (67-71 g), even higher in supine position with stretched hindlegs (88-92 g), and maximal in hanging abdominal position (109-113 g). By this investigation the increase of load in the puncture channels during forced respiration with pressures of 20 and 30 cm H2O was quantified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3553785     DOI: 10.1007/BF01254086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir        ISSN: 0023-8236


  10 in total

1.  Abdominal wound disruption.

Authors:  M S Baggish; W K Lee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  [Importance of mechanical factors in the development of abdomial wound dehiscence. Tensile strength of the human and animal fascia with regard to various suture-materials].

Authors:  R Tauber; W Seidel
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 0.942

3.  Abdominal wound dehiscence.

Authors:  B F Helmkamp
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1977-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  [Causes and treatment of postoperative rupture of the abdominal wall and abdominal wound dehiscence].

Authors:  G Böttger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1969

5.  [Postoperative abdominal wall rupture].

Authors:  G Böttger; C Vorster
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1969-02       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  [Wound dehiscence following laparotomy].

Authors:  E Amann; G Salem; W Lorbek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.

Authors:  P C Richards; C M Balch; J S Aldrete
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prevention of abdominal wound disruption utilizing the Smead-Jones closure technique.

Authors:  D Wallace; W Hernandez; J B Schlaerth; R N Nalick; C P Morrow
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Abdominal wound dehiscence and evisceration: contributing factors and improved mortality.

Authors:  V Haddad; W L Macon
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  [Burst abdomen (author's transl)].

Authors:  A König; H J Grasshoff
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 0.942

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.