Literature DB >> 35535305

Association of C-Terminal Pro-Endothelin-1 with Mortality in the Population-Based KORA F4 Study.

Cornelia Then1,2, Chaterina Sujana2,3,4, Christian Herder5,6,7, Holger Then8, Margit Heier3,9, Christa Meisinger10,11, Annette Peters3,12, Wolfgang Koenig12,13,14, Wolfgang Rathmann5,15, Haifa Maalmi5,7, Katrin Ritzel1, Michael Roden5,6,7, Michael Stumvoll16, Barbara Thorand2,3, Jochen Seissler1,2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Endothelin-1 and its prohormone C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) have been linked to metabolic alterations, inflammatory responses and cardiovascular events in selected study populations. We analyzed the association of CT-proET-1 with cardiovascular events and mortality, carotid intima-media-thickness as surrogate for early atherosclerotic lesions, biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and adipokines in a population-based study.
Methods: The cross-sectional and prospective analyses used data from the KORA F4 study with a median follow-up time of 9.1 (8.8-9.4) years. Data on CT-proET-1 and mortality were available for 1554 participants, data on the other outcomes in subgroups (n = 596-1554). The associations were estimated using multivariable linear regression and Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for sex, age, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, arterial hypertension, diabetes, low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, current and former smoking and physical activity. The Bonferroni method was used to correct for multiple testing.
Results: In the fully adjusted model, CT-proET-1 was associated with cardiovascular (hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation increase: 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-2.51; p = 0.017) and all-cause mortality (HR: 2.03; 95% CI 1.55-2.67; p < 0.001), but not with cardiovascular events, and was inversely associated with the intima-media thickness (β: -0.09 ± 0.03; p = 0.001). CT-proET-1 was positively associated with five out of ten biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and with two out of five adipokines after correction for multiple testing. After inclusion of biomarkers of subclinical inflammation in the Cox proportional hazard model, the association of CT-proET-1 with all-cause mortality persisted (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: These results emphasize the complexity of endothelin-1 actions and/or indicator functions of CT-proET-1. CT-proET-1 is a risk marker for all-cause mortality, which is likely independent of vascular endothelin-1 actions, cardiovascular disease and inflammation.
© 2022 Then et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT-proET-1; cardiovascular events; endothelin; intima-media thickness; mortality; subclinical inflammation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35535305      PMCID: PMC9078871          DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S363814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag        ISSN: 1176-6344


Introduction

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a vasoactive 21-amino acid peptide secreted by vascular endothelium smooth vascular muscle cells, epicardial cells and renal cells. ET-1 acts via different endothelin receptors (ETR) and mediates vasoconstrictive effects by targeting endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells via ETRA.1 ET-1 targets capillary and arterial endothelial cells, potentially inducing pulmonary hypertension and systemic vasoconstriction.2 In contrast, ETRB mediates vascular smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilation via the release of prostaglandins and nitric oxide.3 Further ETRB effects include natriuresis4 and direct metabolic effects.5 ET-1 is instable and rapidly cleared from the circulation, preventing reliable measurements. Therefore, more recently, its prohormone C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1), which is cleaved from the respective precursor protein and secreted in equimolar concentrations, is used as a stable surrogate parameter.6 Due to vasoconstrictive and pro-inflammatory properties, ET-1 putatively plays a causal role in metabolic disturbances, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular events and mortality. ET-1 or its surrogate CT-proET-1 were associated with the metabolic syndrome and impaired glucose tolerance in the general population,7,8 and with increased inflammation, cardiovascular disease and mortality in studies involving critically ill patients,9 participants with heart failure,10,11 acute myocardial infarction12–14 and chronic kidney disease.15 However, these results were not confirmed by all studies,16–19 and the association of CT-proET-1 with cardiovascular events, mortality and (subclinical) inflammation is less well studied in the general population. The aim of the current study was to investigate the association of CT-proET-1 with cardiovascular events and mortality, carotid intima-media-thickness (IMT) as surrogate for early atherosclerotic lesions, biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and adipokines in a large population-based cohort. We further examined whether biomarkers of subclinical inflammation confounded the association of CT-proET-1 with mortality.

Methods

Study Cohort and Definition of Variables

The KORA (Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg) F4 (2006–2008) study is a follow-up examination of the population-based KORA S4 study (1999–2001). The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Bavarian Medical Association (approval number 06068) in adherence to the declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave written informed consent. Recruitment and eligibility criteria for the KORA studies, study design, standardized sampling methods and data collection (medical history, medication, anthropometric and blood pressure measurements) have been described in detail elsewhere.20,21 CT-proET-1 was measured in the first consecutive 1596 participants of the KORA F4 study (out of a total of 3080 participants). All variables necessary for the analysis of the association of CT-proET-1 with mortality were available in 1554 participants. Measurements of white blood cell count and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were available in 1552 participants; leptin and retinol-binding protein-4 (RBP-4) in 1547 participants; chemerin, progranulin and vaspin in 1055 participants; interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-18 (IL-18), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), myeloperoxidase (MPO), superoxide dismutase-3 (SOD-3), interleukin-22 (IL-22) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) were available in 596 participants aged ≥ 62 years. The outcomes all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (ICD-9 codes 390–459 and 798) were ascertained by regularly checking the status of the participants through the population registries until 2016. Death certificates were obtained from the local health authorities. The median (1st; 3rd quartile) follow-up time was 9.1 (8.8; 9.4) years. Myocardial infarction and stroke at baseline were self-reported diagnoses. Incident myocardial infarction occurring until the age of 74 years (for cases occurring before 2009) and until the age of 84 years (for cases occurring since 2009) was assessed by surveillance through the local myocardial infarction registry. Incident non-fatal myocardial infarction occurring in participants >74 and > 84 years, respectively, depending on the year of occurrence, or residing outside the study area as well as non-fatal stroke were assessed by postal follow-up questionnaires. All self-reported incident stroke cases and myocardial infarction cases occurring outside the study area or in persons > 74 or 84 years (depending on the year of occurrence) and the date of diagnosis were validated using data from participants’ hospital records and their attending physicians. Stroke and myocardial infarction were pooled to a combined endpoint with only the first event taken into account in case of several events. Participants with prevalent stroke (n = 34) or prevalent myocardial infarction (n = 52) or missing data on incident stroke and myocardial infarction (n = 84) were excluded from the analyses regarding the outcome of incident stroke or myocardial infarction. The follow-up time (median (1st quartile; 3rd quartile)) was 8.6 (8.1; 9.0) years for incident stroke/myocardial infarction. Criteria for diabetes mellitus were a validated medical diagnosis or current self-reported use of glucose-lowering agents. Participants without clinically diagnosed diabetes underwent a standard 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Newly diagnosed diabetes was defined according to the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria (≥ 7.0 mmol/l fasting and/or ≥ 11.1 mmol/l 2-h glucose). Participants with a diabetes type other than type 2 or unknown glucose tolerance status (n = 25) were excluded from the analyses. Arterial hypertension was defined as a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg and/or a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, and/or intake of anti-hypertensive medication, given that the participants were aware of being hypertensive. Leisure-time physical activity was assessed with two separate questions concerning leisure time sports activity in winter and in summer (cycling included). Possible answers were (i) > 2 hours, (ii) 1–2 hours, (iii) < 1 hour and (iv) none per week. Participants who had a total score < 5, obtained by summing the numbers (i)-(iv) from the winter and summer questions, were classified as “physically active”.

Biochemical Measurements

Blood samples were collected after an overnight fast of at least eight hours. Plasma was separated immediately, serum after 30 min. Plasma and serum samples were assayed immediately or stored at −80°C. Plasma CT-proET-1 was measured by sandwich fluoro-immunoassay (BRAHMS, Hennigsdorf, Berlin, Germany) on an automated BRAHMS KRYPTOR system as previously described.8 The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation for CT-proET-1 were 4.8 and 6.9%. Serum creatinine was assayed with a modified Jaffe test (Krea Flex; Dade Behring, Deerfield, IL, USA). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (2009) based on serum creatinine.22 Glucose levels were measured in serum using a hexokinase method (GLUFlex, Dade Behring). HbA1c was measured in hemolyzed whole blood using the cation-exchange high performance liquid chromatographic, photometric VARIANT II TURBO HbA1c Kit - 2.0 assay on a VARIANT II TURBO Hemoglobin Testing System (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, USA). Plasma hsCRP was measured with a high-sensitivity latex-enhanced nephelometric assay on a BN II analyzer (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were measured with Quantikine HS ELISA kits, IL-22, IL-1RA and sICAM-1 with Quantikine ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany).23–25 Serum levels of IL-18 were assayed using ELISA kits from MBL (Nagoya, Japan). Serum MPO concentrations were measured using the Human Myeloperoxidase Quantikine ELISA (R&D Systems, Wiesbaden, Germany). Serum SOD-3 concentrations were measured with an ELISA from Cloud‐Clone Corp. (Houston, TX, USA).26 Intra-assay coefficients of variation for hsCRP, IL-1RA, IL-22, sICAM-1, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-18, MPO and SOD-3 were 2.7, 2.8, 5.5, 3.5, 7.2, 6.3, 7.6, 3.2 and 7.1%, respectively. Interassay coefficients were 6.3, 7.0, 9.3, 6.4, 11.8, 14.4, 9.4, 5.6 and 7.1%, respectively. For IL-22, 204 (34%) of the sera yielded values below the limit of detection (LOD; 3.9 pg/mL). Values below LOD were assumed to be evenly distributed between 0 and LOD and were assigned a value of 0.5 × LOD. Leptin was measured by ELISA (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden) with intra‐ and inter‐assay coefficients of variation of < 10%. RBP-4 were measured by immunonephelometry using a BN II analyzer. Chemerin serum concentrations were measured using a commercially available ELISA kit (Human Chemerin ELISA, Biovendor, Heidelberg, Germany) with a sensitivity of 0.1 ng/mL and intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of 6.0% and 7.6%.27 Progranulin serum concentrations were analyzed using the Progranulin human ELISA Kit AdipoGen from AdipoGen (Seoul, Korea).27 Serum vaspin concentrations were quantified using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (AdipoGen) with a sensitivity of 12 pg/mL. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation were 1.3–3.8% and 3.3–9.1%, respectively.27

Measurement of IMT

Ultrasound measurement (Sonoline G, 10-MHz transducer; Siemens Medical Solutions, Munich, Germany) of both common carotid arteries (CCA) was performed using a validated protocol28 as previously described.29 The average of the measurements of 3 frozen images from both the left and right CCA were used to calculate artery thickness of the distal CCA ((mean left + mean right)/2). One certified reader measured all IMT scans. Reproducibility studies for intersonographer (n = 30 IMT measurements) and inter-reader variability (n = 50 IMT measurements) revealed coefficients of variations of 1.9% and 3.0% with Spearman correlation coefficients of ≥ 0.89.

Statistical Analysis

Characteristics of the study participants were compared between survivors and non-survivors using t-tests in case of approximately normally distributed variables. Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed for variables with skewed distributions. Binomial proportions were compared with Chi-square tests. The associations of CT-proET-1 with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were examined using Cox proportional hazard models. The cross-sectional associations of CT-proET-1 with IMT, biomarkers of subclinical inflammation, adipokines and with traditional cardiovascular risk factors were assessed using linear regression models. Categorical cardiovascular risk factors were analyzed with logistic regression models. Continuous variables were transformed to approach Gaussian distribution by the probability integral transformation followed by an inverse transform sampling and were used in calculations per one standard deviation. The associations of CT-proET-1 with the respective outcomes were examined in models without adjustments (Model 1) and with adjustments for the covariates sex, age, BMI, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, eGFR (continuous), LDL cholesterol (continuous), HDL cholesterol (continuous), physical activity (active/inactive), current smoking and former smoking (Model 2). For further analyses, models adjusted for IL-6 and sICAM-1 were calculated. Participants with missing data were excluded from the respective adjusted and crude analyses. The level of statistical significance was set at 5% (two-sided). The Bonferroni method was used to correct for multiple testing when appropriate. The calculations were performed using the statistical environment R, version 3.6.0 (R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2019).

Results

Clinical Characteristics of the Study Participants

Clinical characteristics of the study participants are shown in Table 1. CT-proET-1 was higher in non-survivors compared to survivors ().
Table 1

Characteristics of the Study Participants at KOFA F4 Overall and Stratified by Survival Status (Mean ± Standard Deviation, Median (First Quartile; Third Quartile), or Number of Participants (Proportion in %))

Total Study GroupSurvivorsNon-SurvivorsP valuea
n15541415139
Male sex n (%)763 (49)675 (48)88 (63)< 0.001b
Age (years)56.9 ± 12.955.5 ± 12.470.7 ± 8.9< 0.001c
BMI (kg/m2)27.4 ± 4.627.3 ± 4.628.9 ± 4.8< 0.001c
HDL cholesterol (mmol/l)1.40 (1.16; 1.68)1.40 (1.19; 1.68)1.34 (1.11; 1.60)0.089d
LDL cholesterol (mmol/l)3.47 (2.87; 4.03)3.47 (2.88; 4.06)3.47 (2.84; 3.94)0.601d
Type 2 diabetes n (%)181 (12)138 (10)43 (31)< 0.001b
Hypertension n (%)618 (40)521 (37)97 (70)< 0.001b
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)88.4 (77.0; 99.0)89.6 (77.0; 99.0)73.7 (61.7; 87.4)< 0.001d
Physically inactive n (%)657 (42)570 (40)87 (63)< 0.001b
Smoker current/ex n (%)273/639 (18/41)253/574 (18/41)20/65 (14/47)0.361/0.138b
CT-proET-1 (pmol/l)45.5 (39.4; 53.3)44.9 (39.0; 51.9)57.6 (48.8; 71.2)< 0.001d
n12691165104
IMT (mm)0.83 (0.74; 0.93)0.82 (0.74; 0.92)0.92 (0.86; 1.04)< 0.001d
n15521414138
White blood cell count per nl5.7 (4.9; 6.8)5.7 (4.8; 6.7)6.2 (5.2; 7.7)< 0.001d
hsCRP (mg/l)1.11 (0.55; 2.43)1.05 (0.52; 2.24)2.03 (0.92; 4.73)< 0.001d
n15471409138
Leptin (ng/mL)11.8 (5.4; 24.0)11.9 (5.4; 23.6)11.05 (6.1; 29.2)0.392d
Retinol-binding protein-4 (g/l)0.042 (0.035; 0.049)0.042 (0.035; 0.049)0.043 (0.033; 0.054)0.181d
n105597085
Chemerin (ng/mL)171.8 (140.7; 205.4)171.2 (140.7; 205.0)193.6 (147.2; 216.5)0.039d
Progranulin (ng/mL)126.4 (99.4; 170.8)125.6 (99.1; 168.6)143.4 (102.7; 183.3)0.080d
Vaspin (ng/mL)0.61 (0.34; 1.14)0.61 (0.35; 1.15)0.68 (0.33; 1.11)0.993d
n596492104
Interleukin-6 (pg/mL)1.52 (1.04; 2.28)1.47 (0.98; 2.09)2.06 (1.50; 3.43)< 0.001d
Tumor necrosis factor-α (pg/mL)2.02 (1.46; 2.99)1.99 (1.45; 2.90)2.25 (1.62; 3.56)0.043d
Interleukin-18 (pg/mL)319.0 (254.0; 416.5)316.0 (253.0; 408.0)363.0 (257.5; 445.0)0.015d
Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ng/mL)232.2 (199.8; 260.9)226.6 (196.3; 258.0)247.8 (218.2; 296.0)< 0.001d
Myeloperoxidase (ng/mL)154.9 (96.55; 223.9)149.1 (94.0; 212.1)204.9 (123.4; 266.7)< 0.001d
Superoxide dismutase-3 (ng/mL)127.1 (112.2; 143.0)126.4 (112.0; 141.3)132.6 (113.7; 156.3)0.006d
Interleukin-22 (pg/mL)6.24 (1.95; 13.27)6.13 (1.95; 11.75)8.54 (1.95; 20.81)0.006d
Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (pg/mL)303.9 (235.2; 409.0)299.6 (230.3; 391.7)338.0 (260.8; 453.6)0.002d

Notes: athe p value is related to the null hypothesis of no difference between survivors and non-survivors; bChi-square test; ct-test; dmann–Whitney U-test.

Characteristics of the Study Participants at KOFA F4 Overall and Stratified by Survival Status (Mean ± Standard Deviation, Median (First Quartile; Third Quartile), or Number of Participants (Proportion in %)) Notes: athe p value is related to the null hypothesis of no difference between survivors and non-survivors; bChi-square test; ct-test; dmann–Whitney U-test.

Association of CT-proET-1 with Cardiovascular Risk Factors

CT-proET-1 was significantly positively associated with sex, age, BMI, type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, active and former smoking, and was inversely associated with LDL and HDL cholesterol, eGFR and physical activity. The strongest associations were observed with age, BMI, type 2 diabetes and inversely with the eGFR (Table 2). Scatterplots of CT-proET-1 in relation to age, BMI and eGFR are shown in .
Table 2

Association of CT-proET-1 (as Dependent Variable) with Metabolic and Cardiovascular Risk Factors (as Independent Variables)

β-Coefficienta ± SEp-value
Without adjustment
Male sex0.161 ± 0.0500.002
Age0.481 ± 0.022<0.001
BMI0.320 ± 0.020<0.001
Adjustment for sex, age and BMI
Type 2 diabetes0.410 ± 0.072<0.001
Hypertension0.307 ± 0.051<0.001
LDL cholesterol−0.074± 0.022<0.001
HDL cholesterol−0.180 ± 0.025<0.001
eGFR−0.393 ± 0.027<0.001
Current smokingb0.293 ± 0.063<0.001
Former smoking0.115 ± 0.0490.018
Physically inactive−0.116 ± 0.0440.009

Notes: aper standard deviation increase of continuous variables (BMI, LDL and HDL cholesterol, eGFR) bas compared to never smokers.

Association of CT-proET-1 (as Dependent Variable) with Metabolic and Cardiovascular Risk Factors (as Independent Variables) Notes: aper standard deviation increase of continuous variables (BMI, LDL and HDL cholesterol, eGFR) bas compared to never smokers.

Association of CT-proET-1 with Cardiovascular Complications and Mortality

CT-proET-1 was associated with stroke, myocardial infarction, the combined outcome of stroke and myocardial infarction, and with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in the unadjusted model (Model 1). After multivariable adjustment (Model 2), CT-proET-1 was no longer significantly associated with non-fatal or fatal stroke, non-fatal or fatal myocardial infarction or the combined endpoint of both outcomes (Table 3).
Table 3

Hazard Ratios (95% Confidence Interval) of the Association Between CT-proET-1 (per Standard Deviation) with Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality

Number of Participants/EventsModel 1aP valueModel 2bP value
Non-fatal or fatal incident stroke
1384/641.78 (1.39–2.28)< 0.0010.99 (0.69–1.41)0.951
Non-fatal or fatal incident myocardial infarction
n = 1384/472.05 (1.50–2.75)< 0.0011.29 (0.84–1.97)0.247
Non-fatal or fatal stroke or myocardial infarction
1384/1011.79 (1.47–2.18)< 0.0011.00 (0.75–1.33)0.993
Cardiovascular Mortality
1554/633.06 (2.37–3.95)< 0.0011.66 (1.10–2.51)0.017
All-cause mortality
1554/1392.93 (2.47–3.48)< 0.0012.03 (1.55–2.67)<0.001

Notes: aModel 1: without adjustment; bModel 2: adjusted for sex, age, BMI, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, eGFR, LDL and HDL cholesterol, current and former smoking, physical activity; bold print indicates significance in the fully adjusted model after correction for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method (p < 0.01 (0.05 ÷ 5)).

Hazard Ratios (95% Confidence Interval) of the Association Between CT-proET-1 (per Standard Deviation) with Cardiovascular Outcomes and All-Cause Mortality Notes: aModel 1: without adjustment; bModel 2: adjusted for sex, age, BMI, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, eGFR, LDL and HDL cholesterol, current and former smoking, physical activity; bold print indicates significance in the fully adjusted model after correction for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method (p < 0.01 (0.05 ÷ 5)). CT-proET-1 was associated with cardiovascular mortality (HR per standard deviation: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.10–2.51; p = 0.017) and all-cause mortality (HR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.55–2.67; p < 0.001) in the fully adjusted model. However, only the association with all-cause mortality met the corrected significance threshold (Table 3). Additional adjustment for stroke and myocardial infarction did not further attenuate the association of CT-proET-1 with cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.12–2.57; p = 0.013) and all-cause mortality (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.57–2.71; p < 0.001).

Inverse Association of CT-proET-1 with IMT

In the crude model, CT-proET-1 was positively associated with the IMT (β per standard deviation: 0.29 ± 0.03; p < 0.001). Adjustment for age alone strongly attenuated this association (β: 0.005 ± 0.02; p = 0.83). After multivariable adjustment according to Model 2 (sex, age, BMI, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, eGFR, LDL and HDL cholesterol, current and former smoking, physical activity), the association between CT-proET-1 and IMT became inverse (β: −0.09 ± 0.03; p = 0.001).

Association of CT-proET-1 with Biomarkers of Subclinical Inflammation and Adipokines

CT-proET-1 was positively associated with the pro-inflammatory markers hsCRP, IL-6, TNF-α, IL-18, sICAM-1, MPO and with the anti-inflammatory marker IL-22. After correction for multiple testing, CT-proET-1 was still significantly associated with IL-6, TNF-α, IL-18, sICAM-1 and IL-22. No significant association was observed with white blood cell count and the anti-inflammatory markers SOD-3 and IL-1ra (Table 4).
Table 4

Association of CT-proET-1 (per Standard Deviation) with Biomarkers of Subclinical Inflammation (per Standard Deviation): β Coefficients ± Standard Error from Linear Regression Models Adjusted for Sex, Age, BMI, eGFR, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes, LDL and HDL Cholesterol, Current and Former Smoking, Physical Activity (Model 2)

Number of Participantsβ Coefficient ± Standard Errorp
Biomarkers of subclinical inflammation
White blood cell count15460.015 ± 0.0310.620
hsCRP15520.085 ± 0.0290.004
Interleukin-65960.151 ± 0.0470.001
Tumor necrosis factor alpha5960.201 ± 0.050<0.001
Interleukin-185960.171 ± 0.049<0.001
SICAM-15960.190 ± 0.050<0.001
MPO5960.121 ± 0.0510.019
SOD-35960.095 ± 0.0510.061
Interleukin-225960.136 ± 0.0430.002
IL1Ra5960.078 ± 0.0470.099
Adipokines
Leptin15470.072 ± 0.019<0.001
RBP-415470.073 ± 0.0290.012
Chemerin10550.109 ± 0.0350.002
Progranulin10550.107 ± 0.0390.006
Vaspin1055−0.025 ± 0.0390.518

Note: Bold print indicates significance after correction for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method (p < 0.0033 (0.05 ÷ 15)).

Association of CT-proET-1 (per Standard Deviation) with Biomarkers of Subclinical Inflammation (per Standard Deviation): β Coefficients ± Standard Error from Linear Regression Models Adjusted for Sex, Age, BMI, eGFR, Hypertension, Type 2 Diabetes, LDL and HDL Cholesterol, Current and Former Smoking, Physical Activity (Model 2) Note: Bold print indicates significance after correction for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method (p < 0.0033 (0.05 ÷ 15)). Regarding adipokines, CT-proET-1 was significantly associated with the primarily pro-inflammatory adipokines leptin and chemerin after correction for multiple testing. The association with RBP-4 and the anti-inflammatory progranulin did not meet the corrected significance threshold. The anti-inflammatory vaspin was not significantly associated with CT-proET-1 (Table 4). Exemplary scatterplots of CT-proET-1 in relation to IL-6, TNF-α, sICAM-1, leptin and chemerin are given in . Among the biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and adipokines that were associated with CT-proET-1, only IL-6 and sICAM-1 were significantly associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment for sex and age (p < 0.001 for both). We included IL-6 and sICAM-1 in the unadjusted model (Model 1) and in the fully adjusted model (Model 2) of the association of CT-proET-1 with all-cause mortality and found that the association in Model 2 was modestly attenuated but remained significant. The attenuation was more pronounced when adding both markers to Model 2. Remarkably, adjustment for IL-6 alone in the otherwise unadjusted model resulted in a stronger attenuation as compared to full adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors (Model 2; Table 5).
Table 5

Hazard Ratios (95% Confidence Interval) of the Association Between CT-proET-1 (per Standard Deviation) and All-Cause Mortality Adjusted for IL-6 and sICAM-1, Respectively. N = 596, Events = 104

AdjustmentsHR (95% CI)P value
Model 1a2.08 (1.70–2.55)< 0.001
Model 2b1.91 (1.42–2.56)< 0.001
Model 1a plus IL-61.73 (1.40–2.14)< 0.001
Model 2b plus IL-61.73 (1.29–2.33)< 0.001
Model 1a plus sICAM-11.94 (1.58–2.39)< 0.001
Model 2b plus sICAM-11.76 (1.32–2.36)< 0.001
Model 2b plus IL-6 and sICAM-11.61 (1.20–2.16)0.002

Notes: aModel 1: without adjustment; bModel 2: adjusted for sex, age, BMI, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, eGFR, LDL and HDL cholesterol, current and former smoking, physical activity.

Hazard Ratios (95% Confidence Interval) of the Association Between CT-proET-1 (per Standard Deviation) and All-Cause Mortality Adjusted for IL-6 and sICAM-1, Respectively. N = 596, Events = 104 Notes: aModel 1: without adjustment; bModel 2: adjusted for sex, age, BMI, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, eGFR, LDL and HDL cholesterol, current and former smoking, physical activity.

Discussion

In the KORA F4 study, CT-proET-1 was associated with cardiovascular risk factors, all-cause mortality, biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and adipokines, but not with cardiovascular events. CT-proET-1 was inversely associated with IMT after multivariable adjustment.

Association of CT-proET-1 with Mortality

CT-proET-1 was associated with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The associations were largely independent of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. The association of CT-proET-1 with all-cause mortality was also largely independent of selected biomarkers of subclinical inflammation. The literature describes an association of ET-1/CT-proET-1 with cardiovascular and/or all-cause mortality in studies mostly including participants with high cardiovascular risk. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, CT-proET-1 offered additional prognostic information regarding mortality,12,13 and higher ET-1 was a predictor of a combined endpoint of major adverse clinical outcomes and mortality.14 Similarly, CT-proET-1 improved the risk stratification for mortality after acute ischemic stroke.30 In patients with systolic heart failure, CT-proET-1 was associated with adverse outcomes including mortality.10,11 Regarding population-based studies, CT-proET-1 was recently shown to be associated with all-cause mortality in a Swedish population.31 However, other studies showed no association of ET-1/CT-proET-1 with adverse outcomes after ischemic stroke,16 in patients on hemodialysis17 and in patients with heart failure,19 or even an inverse association of CT-proET-1 with mortality in heart failure patients,32 emphasizing the heterogeneity of the literature regarding the association of ET-1/CT-proET-1 with mortality. In the present study, we observed no significant association between CT-proET-1 and incidence of cardiovascular events after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors. Our study had a relatively low number of incident cardiovascular events and therefore may not be sufficiently powered to detect significant associations. However, regarding stroke and the combined endpoint, the hazard ratios were 0.99 and 1.00, indicating no association with CT-proET-1 in our study. Previous studies on an association of ET-1/CT-proET-1 with prevalent cardiovascular disease and incident cardiovascular events were again mainly performed in high-risk populations and yielded mixed results. In a cross-sectional analysis of 961 older participants, ET-1 was associated with prevalent coronary heart disease in women, but in men only when aged > 75 years.33 In patients with type 2 diabetes, CT-proET-1 was associated with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in one study.34 However, in another study involving 781 patients with type 2 diabetes, CT-proET-1 was not an independent predictor for fatal/non-fatal cardiovascular events.18 In a study including participants referred for coronary angiography, ET-1 was not associated with the presence or severity of coronary artery disease, but with all-cause mortality.35 Thus, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to examine the association between CT-proET-1 with cardiovascular events.

Inverse Association of CT-proET-1 with IMT After Adjustment for Cardiovascular Risk Factors

In the current study, CT-proET-1 was positively associated with IMT in the crude model, but inversely after multivariable adjustment, which is an unexpected finding at a first glance. Previous data on the association of ET-1 or CT-proET-1 with IMT or intima-media thickness of peripheral arteries were mainly derived from small, selected cohorts and were inconsistent. Whereas ET-1 was positively associated with IMT in 61 older hypertensive patients (mean age 72.4 years),36 in a cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease, serum and tissue ET-1 was independent of the intima-media thickness of peripheral arteries.37 ET-1 infusion had no influence on extracerebral arteries or cerebral blood flow, suggesting that intravascular ET-1 does not have a direct cerebrovascular effect.38 Two small studies involving patients with type 2 diabetes39 and type 1 diabetes40 found an inverse association of ET-1 with the IMT. Regarding measures of vascular function, CT-proET-1 was not associated with peripheral arterial tonometry in a population-based European study.41 Another study found a correlation between ET-1 and pulse pressure, which was, however, only present in Blacks and not in non-Hispanic Whites.42 Similarly, CT-proET-1 was associated with the ankle-brachial index only in hypertensive African Americans, but not in hypertensive non-Hispanic Whites.43 Therefore, as described for instance for aldosterone,44 ethnic differences may also play a role. The present study mainly included Western European participants and thus we were unable to test this hypothesis. Our data suggest that in certain settings moderately increased CT-proET-1 concentrations may indicate a reduced risk of early carotid atherosclerotic lesions. A possible explanation are differential effects of ET-1 on different vascular beds. Similar findings were previously shown for the vasoconstrictive peptide copeptin45 and corroborated by experimental studies showing a vasodilatation of carotid arteries after vasopressin infusion in rats despite a systemic blood pressure increase.46 Thus, the net effect of circulating vasoconstrictive peptides may depend on the absolute hormone concentration and on the vascular bed. Whereas high levels may be proatherogenic or indirectly indicate an increased risk for vascular complications, intermediate concentrations may exert an inert or even protective effect on carotid vascular endothelium. CT-proET-1 was associated with several biomarkers of subclinical inflammation as well as with adipokines. To our knowledge, the association of CT-proET-1 with a large number of biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and adipokines has been analyzed for the first time in a cohort of the general population. Previously, an association of CT-proET-1 with hsCRP, TNF-α and IL-6 has been described in patients with chronic heart failure.47 The association of ET-1 and markers of inflammation appears to be bi-directional and exhibits some inconsistencies in preclinical studies. ET-1 induces the production of IL-6, IL-13, IL-2 and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor in pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells.48 Conversely, ET-1 release from endothelial cells is stimulated by TNF-α49 and IL-6.50 However, a dual ETRA and ETRB blocker had no effect on TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-10 plasma levels in a porcine model of sepsis,51 and differential effects of ETRA and ETRB activation depending on tissue are described.52 Interestingly, blocking of the ETRA was associated with an increase of the anti-inflammatory SOD activity in rats.53 In our study, CT-proET-1 was not significantly associated with SOD-3. However, we found a positive association with the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-22, indicating that ET-1 may also exert immunomodulatory effects. The association of CT-proET-1 appeared to be stronger with primarily pro-inflammatory markers and adipokines than with anti-inflammatory markers, matching the putative pro-inflammatory properties of ET-1. The association of CT-proET-1 with all-cause mortality was attenuated by correction for IL-6 and sICAM-1 but remained statistically significant.

Limitations

The current data are based on a well-characterized large population-based study sample. Nevertheless, some of the null results might be due to insufficient power. The numbers of myocardial infarctions and cardiovascular mortality were relatively low, precluding definite conclusions regarding these outcomes. This may also hold true for the absence of differences after multiple testing for some of the biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and adipokines (e g MPO and progranulin). The study participants were mainly Western Europeans, limiting the generalizability of the results. The observational nature of the study precludes statements about causality.

Conclusions

CT-proET-1 was associated with all-cause mortality and with biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and adipokines. However, no significant association was detected regarding cardiovascular events. CT-proET-1 was even inversely associated with the IMT after multivariable adjustment. The results emphasize the complexity of ET-1 actions and/or indicator functions of CT-proET-1. Nevertheless, CT-proET-1 is an independent risk marker for all-cause mortality.
  53 in total

1.  Differential association between biomarkers of subclinical inflammation and painful polyneuropathy: results from the KORA F4 study.

Authors:  Christian Herder; Brenda W C Bongaerts; Wolfgang Rathmann; Margit Heier; Bernd Kowall; Wolfgang Koenig; Barbara Thorand; Michael Roden; Christa Meisinger; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Three-year change in endothelin-1 and markers of vascular remodelling in a bi-ethnic South African cohort: the SABPA study.

Authors:  C S du Plooy; C M C Mels; H W Huisman; R Kruger
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 3.  Role of endothelin-1 in acute lung injury.

Authors:  Alejandro P Comellas; Arturo Briva
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 7.012

4.  Adrenomedullin and endothelin-1 are related to inflammation in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  T Gombos; Z Förhécz; Z Pozsonyi; S Wallentin; J Papassotiriou; J Kunde; N G Morgenthaler; L Jánoskuti; Z Prohászka
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.575

5.  Serum and tissue endothelin-1 are independent from intima-media thickness of peripheral arteries in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Nariman Nezami; Nariman Sepehrvand; Mohammad Mirchi; Behzad Salari; Behrooz Shokouhi; Morteza Ghojazadeh; Mohammad Naghavi-Behzad; Sona Ghorashi; Fariba Mirzaie; Hamid Noshad; Afshar Zomorrodi; Abasad Gharedaghi; Savalan Babapoor-Farrokhran; Saeedeh Mirbagheri; Mohammad Kazem Tarzamni
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 1.285

6.  Prognostic value of plasma midregional pro-adrenomedullin and C-terminal-pro-endothelin-1 in chronic heart failure outpatients.

Authors:  Christopher Adlbrecht; Martin Hülsmann; Guido Strunk; Rudolf Berger; Deddo Mörtl; Joachim Struck; Nils G Morgenthaler; Andreas Bergmann; Johannes Jakowitsch; Gerald Maurer; Irene M Lang; Richard Pacher
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 15.534

7.  Vasoactive Biomarkers Associated With Long-Term Incidence of Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease and Mortality.

Authors:  Ardwan Dakhel; Gunnar Engström; Olle Melander; Stefan Acosta; Shahab Fatemi; Anders Gottsäter; Moncef Zarrouk
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Associations between blood glucose and carotid intima-media thickness disappear after adjustment for shared risk factors: the KORA F4 study.

Authors:  Bernd Kowall; Nina Ebert; Cornelia Then; Joachim Thiery; Wolfgang Koenig; Christa Meisinger; Wolfgang Rathmann; Jochen Seissler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Plasma copeptin levels are inversely associated with intima-media-thickness in men: the population-based KORA F4 study.

Authors:  Cornelia Then; Bernd Kowall; Andreas Lechner; Christa Meisinger; Margit Heier; Wolfgang Koenig; Annette Peters; Joachim Thiery; Wolfgang Rathmann; Jochen Seissler
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 9.951

10.  Plasma concentrations of the vasoactive peptide fragments mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, C-terminal pro-endothelin 1 and copeptin in hemodialysis patients: associated factors and prediction of mortality.

Authors:  Ferruh Artunc; Albina Nowak; Christian Mueller; Tobias Breidthardt; Raphael Twerenbold; Robert Wagner; Andreas Peter; Hans-Ulrich Haering; Stefan Ebmeyer; Bjoern Friedrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.