| Literature DB >> 35535192 |
Kai Gao1, Tingting Liu2, Bin Hu1, Miao Hao1, Yueran Zhang1.
Abstract
Scientific and accurate prediction of high-tech industries is of great practical significance for government departments to grasp the future economic operation and formulate development strategies. In this paper, aiming at some shortcomings of neural network (NN) applied in economic forecasting, GANN was introduced to construct the economic forecasting model of high-tech industry. Genetic algorithm (GA) has simple calculation and strong robustness and can generally ensure convergence to the global optimum, which effectively overcomes the shortcomings of NN using gradient descent method. In order to verify the feasibility of the economic forecasting model in this paper, the comparative experiments of different models are carried out in this paper. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has faster convergence speed and greater generalization ability, and the average error rate is reduced to about 1%. The prediction accuracy of this model reached 95.14%, which was about 11.93% higher than the previous model. Applying the economic forecasting model in this paper to the economic forecasting of high-tech industries can provide the means and reference value for the government to formulate regional future economic development plans, forecast, and control the economic growth and development direction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35535192 PMCID: PMC9078764 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2128370
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1GANN algorithm flow.
Figure 2The composition of the GANN-based economic forecasting system and its subsystems.
Prediction evaluation based on MAPE.
| Scope of MAPE | Prediction and evaluation |
|---|---|
| MAPE ≤ 8% | High precision prediction |
| 8% ≤ MAPE ≤ 25% | Good prediction |
| 25% ≤ MAPE ≤ 55% | Feasible prediction |
| MAPE ≥ 55% | Misprediction |
Comparison of different methods.
| Method | Square sum error | Mean absolute error | Mean square deviation | Average percentage error | Mean square percentage error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arima model | 2216.8 | 4.59 | 0.54 | 3.11 | 0.53 |
| Stepar model | 2119.6 | 3.78 | 0.29 | 3.63 | 0.55 |
| Winters model | 1987.2 | 3.96 | 0.37 | 2.26 | 0.42 |
| GANN model | 214.9 | 2.13 | 0.21 | 1.01 | 0.31 |
Figure 3Comparison of MAPE results of different algorithms.
Figure 4Network output error change diagram.
Figure 5Comparison of recall rates of algorithms.
Figure 6Comparison of predicted and actual values.
Figure 7Economic forecast results of different models.