Literature DB >> 35534732

Safe oesophageal stent deployment using a checklist system instead of fluoroscopy.

Muhammad S Khanzada1,2, Abdelmonim E A Salih3,4, Michael R Boland3,4, Thomas N Walsh3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stenting is the management of choice for many benign and malignant oesophageal conditions and in the interest of safety stent insertion has traditionally been performed under fluoroscopic guidance. But this incurs additional expense, time, radiation risk and for the foreseeable future, an increased risk of Covid infection to patients and healthcare personnel. We describe a protocol that obviates the need for fluoroscopic guidance, relying instead on a systematic checklist to ensure safe positioning of the guidewire and the accurate positioning of the stent. The aim of this retrospective study was to review our experience of stent insertion employing a checklist system and compare our outcomes with outcomes using fluoroscopy in the literature.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected dataset of all patients undergoing oesophageal stent insertion between December 2007 and October 2019. The primary end points were patient safety parameters and complications of stent insertion.
RESULTS: Total of 163 stents were deployed of which 93 (57%) were in males and the median age was 67.9 years (25-92 years). Partially covered self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) were used in 80% of procedures (130/163). One hundred nineteen stents (73%) were for malignant strictures and 127 (78%) were deployed for strictures in the lower third of the oesophagus. There was no stent misplacement, injury, perforation or death associated with the procedure. Vomiting was the main post-operative complication (14%). Severe odynophagia necessitated stent removal in 3 patients. Stent migration occurred in 17 (10%) procedures with a mean time to stent migration of 6.4 weeks (range 1-20 weeks).
CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal stent placement without fluoroscopy is safe provided that a strict checklist is adhered to. The outcomes are comparable to the results of fluoroscopic stent placement in the literature, with considerable saving in time, cost, personnel, and risks of radiation and Covid exposure.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Checklist; Fluoroscopic guided; Oesophageal carcinoma; Oesophageal stents; Stenting; Strictures

Year:  2022        PMID: 35534732     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09295-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  Expandable metallic stent placement in patients with benign esophageal strictures: results of long-term follow-up.

Authors:  R A Sheikh; W L Trudeau
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Comparison of endoscopic balloon dilation with metal stent placement in the treatment of achalasia.

Authors:  Hang Zhao; Xin Jian Wan; Chang Qing Yang
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.325

3.  Self-expanding metal stents for palliation of inoperable carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  G D De Palma; G Galloro; L Sivero; E Di Matteo; O Labianca; S Siciliano; P Abbruzzese; C Catanzano
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Yingxue Dai; Chaoying Li; Yao Xie; Xudong Liu; Jianxin Zhang; Jing Zhou; Xiongfei Pan; Shujuan Yang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.