Literature DB >> 35534647

Biomarker Assay Validation by Mass Spectrometry.

Carmen Fernández-Metzler1, Brad Ackermann2, Fabio Garofolo3, Mark E Arnold4, Binodh DeSilva5, Huidong Gu5, Omar Laterza6, Yan Mao7, Mark Rose8, Faye Vazvaei-Smith9, Rick Steenwyk10.   

Abstract

Decades of discussion and publication have gone into the guidance from the scientific community and the regulatory agencies on the use and validation of pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic assays by chromatographic and ligand binding assays for the measurement of drugs and metabolites. These assay validations are well described in the FDA Guidance on Bioanalytical Methods Validation (BMV, 2018). While the BMV included biomarker assay validation, the focus was on understanding the challenges posed in validating biomarker assays and the importance of having reliable biomarker assays when used for regulatory submissions, rather than definition of the appropriate experiments to be performed. Different from PK bioanalysis, analysis of biomarkers can be challenging due to the presence of target analyte(s) in the control matrices used for calibrator and quality control sample preparation, and greater difficulty in procuring appropriate reference standards representative of the endogenous molecule. Several papers have been published offering recommendations for biomarker assay validation. The situational nature of biomarker applications necessitates fit-for-purpose (FFP) assay validation. A unifying theme for FFP analysis is that method validation requirements be consistent with the proposed context of use (COU) for any given biomarker. This communication provides specific recommendations for biomarker assay validation (BAV) by LC-MS, for both small and large molecule biomarkers. The consensus recommendations include creation of a validation plan that contains definition of the COU of the assay, use of the PK assay validation elements that support the COU, and definition of assay validation elements adapted to fit biomarker assays and the acceptance criteria for both.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  LC-MS/MS; assay validation; biomarkers; context of use; fit-for-purpose; regulated bioanalysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35534647     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-022-00707-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  11 in total

Review 1.  Internal standards in the quantitative determination of protein biopharmaceuticals using liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Kees J Bronsema; Rainer Bischoff; Nico C van de Merbel
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Isotope-labeled protein standards: toward absolute quantitative proteomics.

Authors:  Virginie Brun; Alain Dupuis; Annie Adrait; Marlène Marcellin; Damien Thomas; Magali Court; François Vandenesch; Jérôme Garin
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Quantitative performance of internal standard platforms for absolute protein quantification using multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Kerry Bauer Scott; Illarion V Turko; Karen W Phinney
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  2020 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: BAV Guidance, CLSI H62, Biotherapeutics Stability, Parallelism Testing, CyTOF and Regulatory Feedback (Part 2A - Recommendations on Biotherapeutics Stability, PK LBA Regulated Bioanalysis, Biomarkers Assays, Cytometry Validation & Innovation Part 2B - Regulatory Agencies' Inputs on Bioanalysis, Biomarkers, Immunogenicity, Gene & Cell Therapy and Vaccine).

Authors:  Susan Spitz; Yan Zhang; Sally Fischer; Kristina McGuire; Ulrike Sommer; Lakshmi Amaravadi; Abbas Bandukwala; Steven Eck; Fabio Garofolo; Rafiqul Islam; Gregor Jordan; Lindsay King; Yoshiro Saito; Giane Sumner; Linda Terry; Alessandra Vitaliti; Yow-Ming Wang; Christine Grimaldi; Alison Joyce; Rachel Palmer; Matthew Andisik; Marcela Araya; Mitra Azadeh; Daniel Baltrukonis; Rebecca Elliott; Sam Haidar; Seema Kumar; Andrew Mayer; Florian Neff; Nisha Palackal; Kun Peng; Mohsen Rajabi Abhari; Christina Satterwhite; Natasha Savoie; Catherine Soo; Stephen Vinter; Jan Welink; Weili Yan; Kevin Maher; David Lanham; Sylvie Bertholet; Naveen Dakappagari; Christèle Gonneau; Cherie Green; Fabian Junker; Sumit Kar; Lisa Patti-Diaz; Shyam Sarikonda; Megan McCausland; Priscila Camillo Teixeira; Vilma Decman; Jose Estevam; Michael Hedrick; Alberto Hidalgo Robert; Gregory Hopkins; Sandra Nuti; Shabnam Tangri; Richard Wnek; Suman Dandamudi; Arindam Dasgupta; Anna Edmison; Patrick Faustino; Michael McGuinness; Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos; Tahseen Mirza; Diaa Shakleya; Susan Stojdl; Nilufer Tampal; Jinhui Zhang; Elana Cherry; Isabelle Cludts; Andrew Exley; Akiko Ishii-Watabe; Susan Kirshner; Joao Pedras-Vasconcelos; Meiyu Shen; Richard Siggers; Therese Solstad; Daniela Verthelyi; Haoheng Yan; Lucia Zhang
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Multiplexed absolute quantification in proteomics using artificial QCAT proteins of concatenated signature peptides.

Authors:  Robert J Beynon; Mary K Doherty; Julie M Pratt; Simon J Gaskell
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Quantitative bottom-up proteomics depends on digestion conditions.

Authors:  Mark S Lowenthal; Yuxue Liang; Karen W Phinney; Stephen E Stein
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Production, Purification, and Characterization of ¹⁵N-Labeled DNA Repair Proteins as Internal Standards for Mass Spectrometric Measurements.

Authors:  Prasad T Reddy; Pawel Jaruga; Bryant C Nelson; Mark S Lowenthal; Ann-Sofie Jemth; Olga Loseva; Erdem Coskun; Thomas Helleday; Miral Dizdaroglu
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 1.600

8.  Evaluation of interspecimen trypsin digestion efficiency prior to multiple reaction monitoring-based absolute protein quantification with native protein calibrators.

Authors:  Irene van den Broek; Nico P M Smit; Fred P H T M Romijn; Arnoud van der Laarse; André M Deelder; Yuri E M van der Burgt; Christa M Cobbaert
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 4.466

9.  A comparative study of synthetic winged peptides for absolute protein quantification.

Authors:  Eliska Benesova; Veronika Vidova; Zdenek Spacil
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Effects of calibration approaches on the accuracy for LC-MS targeted quantification of therapeutic protein.

Authors:  Eslam Nouri-Nigjeh; Ming Zhang; Tao Ji; Haoying Yu; Bo An; Xiaotao Duan; Joseph Balthasar; Robert W Johnson; Jun Qu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.