Literature DB >> 35532925

Developmental Outcomes for Children After Elective Birth at 39 Weeks' Gestation.

Anthea Lindquist1, Roxanne Hastie1,2, Amber Kennedy1, Lyle Gurrin3, Anna Middleton1, Jon Quach4, Jeanie Cheong5,6, Susan P Walker1, Richard Hiscock1, Stephen Tong1,2.   

Abstract

Importance: Elective births at 39 weeks' gestation are increasing. While this option may improve maternal and perinatal outcomes compared with expectant management, longer-term childhood developmental outcomes are uncertain. Objective: To investigate the association between elective birth at 39 weeks' gestation and the risk of childhood developmental vulnerability. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this cohort study, 2 causal inference analyses were conducted using Australian statewide, population-based data. Perinatal data from births between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2013, were linked to childhood developmental outcomes at age 4 to 6 years (assessed using multiple imputation via inverse probability-weighted regression adjustment). Data analyses were conducted between September 7 and November 9, 2021. Exposures: Two exposure groups were considered: (1) elective birth between 39 weeks and 0 days' and 39 weeks and 6 days' gestation vs expectant management and (2) birth via induction of labor vs planned cesarean delivery among those born electively at 39 weeks' gestation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Childhood developmental vulnerability at school entry, defined as scoring below the 10th percentile in at least 2 of 5 developmental domains (physical health and well-being, social competence, emotional maturity, school-based language and cognitive skills, and communication skills and general knowledge).
Results: Of 176 236 births with linked outcome data, 88 165 met the inclusion criteria. Among these, 15 927 (18.1%) were elective births at 39 weeks' gestation (induction of labor or planned cesarean delivery), and 72 238 (81.9%) were expectantly managed with subsequent birth between 40 and 43 weeks' gestation. Compared with expectant management, elective birth at 39 weeks' gestation was not associated with an altered risk of childhood global developmental vulnerability (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.03; 95% CI, 0.96-1.12) or with developmental vulnerability in any of the individual domains. In an analysis restricted to elective births at 39 weeks' gestation, induction of labor (n = 7928) compared with planned cesarean delivery (n = 7999) was not associated with childhood developmental vulnerability (aRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.82-1.12) or with vulnerability in any individual domains. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, elective birth at 39 weeks' gestation was not associated with childhood developmental vulnerability. For those born electively at 39 weeks' gestation, birth after induction of labor or by elective cesarean delivery had similar developmental outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35532925      PMCID: PMC9086934          DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   26.796


  19 in total

1.  Long-term Cognitive and Health Outcomes of School-Aged Children Who Were Born Late-Term vs Full-Term.

Authors:  David N Figlio; Jonathan Guryan; Krzysztof Karbownik; Jeffrey Roth
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

2.  Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The association between caesarean section and cognitive ability in childhood.

Authors:  Michael Hanrahan; Fergus P McCarthy; Gerard W O'Keeffe; Ali S Khashan
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Operative vaginal delivery and third grade educational outcomes.

Authors:  Nina K Ayala; Lauren E Schlichting; Martha B Kole; Melissa A Clark; Patrick M Vivier; Samara I Viner-Brown; Erika F Werner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM       Date:  2020-09-12

5.  Induction of labor in a contemporary obstetric cohort.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; Jun Zhang; Jagteshwar Grewal; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Julie Beaver; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

7.  Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adnan T Bhutta; Mario A Cleves; Patrick H Casey; Mary M Cradock; K J S Anand
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-08-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Induced Labor in Sweden, 1999-2012: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Cecilia Ekéus; Helena Lindgren
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Association of Term Labor Induction vs Expectant Management With Child Academic Outcomes.

Authors:  Erika F Werner; Lauren E Schlichting; William A Grobman; Samara Viner-Brown; Melissa Clark; Patrick M Vivier
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-04-01

10.  Gestational age and child development at school entry.

Authors:  Gursimran K Dhamrait; Hayley Christian; Melissa O'Donnell; Gavin Pereira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.