Literature DB >> 26776817

Induced Labor in Sweden, 1999-2012: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Cecilia Ekéus1, Helena Lindgren1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies show contradictory results about the impact of induced labor on the cesarean delivery rate and few studies have investigated the risk of vacuum extraction subsequent to induced labor. The aims of the present study were to describe the rate of induced labor in Sweden from 1999 to 2012, and to assess the risk of unplanned cesarean delivery and vacuum extraction after induced labor in relation to medical complications and length of gestation.
METHODS: A register-based cohort study was conducted, including 1,078,536 women with spontaneous or induced onset of labor who gave birth by noninstrumental vaginal delivery, unplanned cesarean delivery, or vacuum extraction in gestational week 37 + 0 to 41 + 6. Logistic regression was used to study the association between induced labor and instrumental delivery.
RESULTS: The rate of induced labor increased from 7.7 to 12.9 percent among primiparous and from 7.5 to 11.8 percent among multiparous women. Induced labor was associated with 2-3 times greater risk of unplanned cesarean delivery among all women, except multiparas in gestational week 37-38, and with a 20-50 percent higher risk of vacuum extraction after the adjustment for confounding factors. Among women without a recognized medical complication, induced labor was associated with a threefold increased risk of cesarean delivery in gestational week 39-41 and a 40 percent increase in gestational week 37-38 compared with women with spontaneous onset of labor.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of induced labors increased substantially during the 14-year study period and was associated with an increased risk of both cesarean delivery and vacuum extraction, even in women without a documented medical complication. The increased risk of instrumental delivery should be taken into account when counseling about the risks and benefits of induced labor.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean delivery; epidemiology; induced labor; mode of delivery; vacuum extraction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26776817     DOI: 10.1111/birt.12220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  6 in total

1.  Time-to-delivery and delivery outcomes comparing three methods of labor induction in 7551 nulliparous women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  C Lindblad Wollmann; M Ahlberg; G Petersson; S Saltvedt; O Stephansson
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Developmental Outcomes for Children After Elective Birth at 39 Weeks' Gestation.

Authors:  Anthea Lindquist; Roxanne Hastie; Amber Kennedy; Lyle Gurrin; Anna Middleton; Jon Quach; Jeanie Cheong; Susan P Walker; Richard Hiscock; Stephen Tong
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 26.796

3.  Temporal Trends in Late Preterm and Early Term Birth Rates in 6 High-Income Countries in North America and Europe and Association With Clinician-Initiated Obstetric Interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer L Richards; Michael S Kramer; Paromita Deb-Rinker; Jocelyn Rouleau; Laust Mortensen; Mika Gissler; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Rolv Skjærven; Sven Cnattingius; Stefan Johansson; Marie Delnord; Siobhan M Dolan; Naho Morisaki; Suzanne Tough; Jennifer Zeitlin; Michael R Kramer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Routine induction in late-term pregnancies: follow-up of a Danish induction of labour paradigm.

Authors:  Eva Rydahl; Eugene Declercq; Mette Juhl; Rikke Damkjær Maimburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Effects of induction of labor prior to post-term in low-risk pregnancies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva Rydahl; Lena Eriksen; Mette Juhl
Journal:  JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep       Date:  2019-02

6.  Symptoms of Discomfort and Problems Associated with Mode of Delivery During the Puerperium: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Juan Miguel Martínez-Galiano; Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Julián Rodríguez-Almagro; Antonio Hernández-Martínez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.