| Literature DB >> 35531334 |
Junbin Yan1,2, Yunmeng Nie1, Yuan Liu1,2, Jingya Li1,2, Liyan Wu3, Zhiyun Chen1,2, Beihui He1,2.
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the treating effect of Yiqi-Bushen-Tiaozhi (YBT) recipe on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) mice, determine whether the outcome was associated with gut microbiota, and clarify the regulating mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: Traditional Chinese Medicine; Yiqi-Bushen-Tiaozhi recipe; gut microbiota; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; α-Linolenic acidlipid metabolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35531334 PMCID: PMC9072834 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.824597
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 5.293
Characteristics of the nine herbs in Yiqi-Bushen-Tiaozhi (YBT) recipe.
| Chinese name | Botanical ID | Botanical name | Genus Family | Used part | Weight (g) | Region | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huangqi | 161231 | Astragalus mongholicus bunge. | Leguminosae | Dried root | 30 | Inner Mongolia | |
| Yinyanghuo | 161102 | Epimedium brevicornu Maxim. | Berberidaceae | Dried rhizome | 12 | Shanxi | |
| Fuling | 161203 | Poria cocos(Schw.)Wolf | Polyporaceae | Dried sclerotium | 15 | Zhejiang | |
| Baizhu | 161208 | Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz. | Compositae | Dried rhizome | 12 | Zhejiang | |
| Heshouwu | 170216 | Fallopia multiflora (Thunb.) Haraldson | Polygonaceae | Dried root | 10 | Zhejiang | |
| Shanzha | 161130 | Crataegus pinnatifida Bunge | Rosaceae | Mature fruit | 24 | Shandong | |
| Haizao | 170205 | Sargassum pallidum (Turn.) C.Ag. | Sargassaceae | Dried frond | 10 | Shandong | |
| Yujin | 161206 | Curcuma aeruginosa Roxb. | Zingiberaceae | Dried root | 10 | Sichuan | |
| Taoren | 161006 | Prunus persica (L.) Batsch | Rosaceae | Mature seed | 10 | Shandong | |
The herb name has been checked by The Plant List (http://www.theplantlist.org), Chinese Pharmacopoeia (http://db.ouryao.com/yd2015/), and Medicinal Plant Names Services (https://www.kew.org/science/our-science/science-services/medicinal-plant-names-services).
The used databases and software in the study.
| Name | Website |
|---|---|
| Databases | |
| The Plant List |
|
| Chinese Pharmacopoeia |
|
| Medicinal Plant Names Services |
|
| UNITE |
|
| SILVA |
|
| QIIME |
|
| Software | |
| Trim Galore |
|
| FLASH2 |
|
| Mothur |
|
| Usearch |
|
| R project |
|
| SPSS 22.0 |
|
| Metastats |
|
| Lefse |
|
mRNA primer sequences.
| Gene | Description | Gene id | Primers (5’→3’) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actin | actin | 11461 | Forward GGGAAATCGTGCGTGACA |
| Reverse CAAGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAAA | |||
| FADS1 | fatty acid desaturase 1 | 76267 | Forward AGCACATGCCATACAACCATC |
| Reverse TTTCCGCTGAACCACAAAATAGA | |||
| FADS2 | fatty acid desaturase 2 | 56473 | Forward AAGGGAGGTAACCAGGGAGAG |
| Reverse CCGCTGGGACCATTTGGTAA | |||
| ACOX1 | acyl-CoA oxidase 1 | 11430 | Forward TAACTTCCTCACTCGAAGCCA |
| Reverse AGTTCCATGACCCATCTCTGTC | |||
| ACOX2 | acyl-CoA oxidase 2 | 93732 | Forward CACCCTGACATAGACAGTGAAAG |
| Reverse CTGGGTCACGTTGGATGAGG |
Figure 1Pathological results of mice. (A) H&E staining results of the mice. (B) Masson staining results of the mice. (C) The photos of the mice’s liver. (D) The NAS calculation results of the mice. (**** p<0.0001 vs NC; #### p<0.0001 vs HFFD).
Figure 2Results of serum biochemical criteria detection. (A) Results of hepatic injury indicators. (B) Results of lipid level. (*p<0.05 vs NC, ****p<0.0001 vs NC; # p<0.05 vs HFFD, ## p<0.01 vs HFFD, ### p<0.001 vs HFFD).
Sequencing data control results.
| Sample | Raw reads | Q20(%)a | Q30(%)a | Clean reads | Clearance(%) | Q20(%)b | Q30(%)b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC1 | 50963 | 97.41 | 95 | 44489 | 12.7 | 98.92 | 97.65 |
| NC2 | 42772 | 97.49 | 95.12 | 37398 | 12.6 | 98.91 | 97.62 |
| NC3 | 61282 | 97.45 | 95.06 | 53638 | 12.5 | 98.94 | 97.66 |
| NC4 | 54857 | 97.47 | 95.08 | 48129 | 12.3 | 98.93 | 97.64 |
| NC5 | 48538 | 97.45 | 95 | 42467 | 12.5 | 98.91 | 97.62 |
| HFFD1 | 50924 | 97.35 | 94.88 | 43974 | 13.6 | 98.9 | 97.65 |
| HFFD2 | 48476 | 97.4 | 94.97 | 42165 | 13.0 | 98.88 | 97.61 |
| HFFD3 | 41431 | 97.55 | 95.23 | 36101 | 12.9 | 98.94 | 97.72 |
| HFFD4 | 62077 | 97.44 | 95.03 | 53476 | 13.9 | 98.87 | 97.57 |
| HFFD5 | 50172 | 97.34 | 94.88 | 43684 | 12.9 | 98.9 | 97.6 |
| HFFD-Y1 | 48949 | 97.42 | 95.01 | 42587 | 13.0 | 98.9 | 97.59 |
| HFFD-Y2 | 52449 | 97.52 | 95.18 | 45909 | 12.5 | 98.91 | 97.63 |
| HFFD-Y3 | 43235 | 97.24 | 94.73 | 37811 | 12.5 | 98.9 | 97.59 |
| HFFD-Y4 | 30244 | 97.33 | 94.83 | 26157 | 13.5 | 98.86 | 97.52 |
| HFFD-Y5 | 53039 | 97.42 | 95.03 | 46556 | 12.2 | 98.9 | 97.64 |
aQuality control results of Raw reads; bQuality control results of Clean reads.
Figure 3Gut microbiota proportion and variations. (A) Analysis results at the class level. (B) Analysis results at the family level.
Figure 4Gut microbiota variations at the genus level. (A) Microbiota with the abundance descend first and then ascend. (B) Microbiota with the abundance ascend first and then descend. (*p<0.05 vs HFFD, **p<0.01 vs HFFD).
Figure 5Results of Alpha Diversity analysis. (A) Results of the index, reflecting the richness of the gut microbiota. (B) Results of the index, reflecting the diversity of the gut microbiota. (*p<0.05 vs HFFD, **p<0.01 vs HFFD).
Figure 6Results of Beta Diversity analysis. (A) Results reflect the similarities and differences of the gut microbiome in the mouse. (B) Results show the significant difference between the NC, HFFD, HFFD-Y groups, and the gut microbiota, causing the above difference. (**p<0.01 vs HFFD).
PICRUSt predicted results (Top 15) of NC vs. HFFD.
| Category | Mean (HFFD) | Mean (NC) | 95.0% lower CI | 95.0% upper CI | Difference between means | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Translation proteins | 0.874890023 | 0.930738032 | -0.072877101 | -0.038818918 | -0.05584801 | 6.53E-05 |
| Protein export | 0.570890696 | 0.648995841 | -0.104925004 | -0.051285285 | -0.078105144 | 0.000150275 |
| Inorganic ion transport and metabolism | 0.314941567 | 0.205608464 | 0.071004319 | 0.147661887 | 0.109333103 | 0.00017334 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 0.027333234 | 0.009168234 | 0.011749403 | 0.024580597 | 0.018165 | 0.000182417 |
| Sulfur relay system | 0.277160852 | 0.189979502 | 0.05603477 | 0.118327932 | 0.087181351 | 0.000197334 |
| Ubiquitin system | 0.011082686 | 0.002531344 | 0.005394877 | 0.011707808 | 0.008551342 | 0.000246426 |
| Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis | 1.042870217 | 1.210518376 | -0.230561541 | -0.104734776 | -0.167648159 | 0.000275528 |
| Pyrimidine metabolism | 1.698997381 | 1.981432841 | -0.389283154 | -0.175587765 | -0.28243546 | 0.000290889 |
| Biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids | 0.170103188 | 0.089659632 | 0.049894747 | 0.110992365 | 0.080443556 | 0.000298439 |
| Caprolactam degradation | 0.060707558 | 0.015310048 | 0.02814692 | 0.062648099 | 0.045397509 | 0.000299682 |
| Transcription related proteins | 0.012791271 | 0.004541361 | 0.005114328 | 0.011385492 | 0.00824991 | 0.000300132 |
| Ribosome | 2.1258525 | 2.532428518 | -0.562643781 | -0.250508255 | -0.406576018 | 0.000320728 |
| Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) | 0.008481049 | 1.74E-05 | 0.005211346 | 0.0117159 | 0.008463623 | 0.000323007 |
| Methane metabolism | 1.195459714 | 1.377981386 | -0.254712831 | -0.110330513 | -0.182521672 | 0.000391433 |
| African trypanosomiasis | 0.009076382 | 0.001118353 | 0.004532621 | 0.011383439 | 0.00795803 | 0.000679797 |
PICRUSt predicted results of HFFD v.s HFFD-Y.
| Category | Mean (HFFD) | Mean (NC) | 95.0% lower CI | 95.0% upper CI | Difference between means | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| alpha-Linolenic acid metabolism | 0.015560353 | 0.002938945 | 0.004363418 | 0.020879399 | 0.012621409 | 0.007794797 |
| Pertussis | 0.082692666 | 0.021797423 | 0.020738964 | 0.10105152 | 0.060895242 | 0.008115229 |
| Nucleotide excision repair | 0.358741223 | 0.416833767 | -0.097146444 | -0.019038644 | -0.058092544 | 0.008952555 |
| Synthesis and degradation of ketone bodies | 0.02113517 | 0.030816229 | -0.016311732 | -0.003050386 | -0.009681059 | 0.009831212 |
Figure 7Results of qRT-PCR. (A) RNA expression of ALA metabolism-related hub enzymes in the small intestine of mice. (B) RNA expression of ALA metabolism-related hub enzymes in the liver of mice. (* p<0.05 vs NC, ** p<0.01 vs NC; # p<0.05 vs HFFD, ## p<0.01 vs HFFD).