| Literature DB >> 35531238 |
Zain Ul Abidin1, Habib Ul Hassan2,3, Zubia Masood4, Naseem Rafique5, Bilal Ahamad Paray6, Karim Gabol2, Muhammad Ishaq Ali Shah7, Aneela Gulnaz8, Asim Ullah9, Talha Zulfiqar10, Mohammad Abdul Momin Siddique11.
Abstract
Rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss has a great nutritional value and delicious taste. A 90-days experimental trial was conducted to investigate the effect of dietary leaf extract of neem tree Azadirachta indica as a feeding supplement on the growth performance and proximate composition of O. mykiss. Four experimental diets were designed as T1 (with 5% A. indica leaf extract), T2 (with 7% of A. indica leaf extract), T3 (with 10% A. indica leaf extract), and T4 (control group feed with a regular diet with 0% A. indica leaf extract). The average initial weight of fry 0.4 ± 0.14 g was stocked at 25 fish/tank with two replicates per treatment (4 × 2 = 8). After 90 days of the experimental trial, One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in final body weight, weight gain, specific growth rate, feed conversion ratio, and survival rate among the treatment groups (p < 0.05). The highest final body weight (48.10 g) and weight gain (47.70 g) was observed in T2 with 7% A. indica leaf extract, which was significantly different from the other treatments (p < 0.05). The lowest FCR was recorded in T2 (1.90), which was significantly different compared to other treatment groups (p < 0.05). Inclusion of A. indica leaf extract in formulated feed for rainbow trout had significant effects in the hepatosomatic index, viscerosomatic index and Fulton's condition factor (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the survival rate of rainbow trout fry treated with different experimental diets (p > 0.05). The phenomenal regression indicates that 7.5% A. indica inclusion is optimum for best growth performance for rainbow trout under a controlled environment. Thus, the present study suggests that the dietary leaf extract has performed an excellent nutritional supplement by enhancing growth performance and health conditions of rainbow trout in the hatchery conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Azadirachta indica; Growth performance; Leaf extract; Proximate composition; Rainbow trout
Year: 2022 PMID: 35531238 PMCID: PMC9073054 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.052
Fig. 1Study area of Madyan valley of Swat in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan.
Ingredients used to prepare experimental diets for rainbow trout, O. mykiss.
| Ingredients | T1 (g/100 g) | T2 (g/100 g) | T3 (g/100 g) | Control T4 (g/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Wheat flour | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Vitamin Mineral | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.075 |
| Vitamin premix | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| Bone meal | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Soya bean meal | 12.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 12.0 |
| Dry milk | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Brewer yeast | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Rice bran | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 |
| Oil (soya bean) | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Fish meal | 35.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 | 35.0 |
| Choline chloride | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Meat meal | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vitamin C | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.075 | 0.075 |
| 5 | 7 | 10 | 0 | |
| Total | 100 g | 100 g | 100 g | 100 g |
Proximate composition of experimental feed for different treatments.
| Treatments | Crude protein (%) | Crude lipid (%) | Crude fiber (%) | Moisture (%) | Ash (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 34.90 ± 0.22 | 06.22 ± 0.32 | 08.95 ± 0.22 | 08.11 ± 0.11 | 09.60 ± 0.33 |
| T2 | 35.01 ± 0.01 | 07.66 ± 0.38 | 09.39 ± 0.04 | 08.32 ± 0.22 | 10.11 ± 0.12 |
| T3 | 35.03 ± 0.02 | 07.88 ± 0.08 | 09.48 ± 0.08 | 09.21 ± 0.02 | 10.25 ± 0.33 |
| T4 | 34.95 ± 0.05 | 06.01 ± 0.06 | 07.88 ± 0.89 | 09.38 ± 0.03 | 10.33 ± 0.24 |
Effects of Azadirachta indica on growth, feed utilization and survival indices of Oncorhynchus mykiss. Values with different superscript in the same raw indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
| Attributes | Inclusion of neem | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (5%) | T2 (7%) | T3 (10%) | T4 (0%) | |
| Initial body weight (g) | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.08 | 0.42 ± 0.11 | 0.41 ± 0.11 |
| Final body weight (g) | 46.10 ± 2.50b | 48.10 ± 0.50a | 47.28 ± 0.35a | 44.20 ± 3.10c |
| Weight gain (g) | 45.10 ± 0.80b | 47.70 ± 0.70a | 46.60 ± .80b | 43.80 ± 0.50c |
| Feed conversion ratio | 2.90 ± 0.0a | 1.90 ± 0.0d | 2.60 ± 0.0b | 2.10 ± 0.0c |
| Specific growth rate (%/day) | 3.62 ± 0.03 a | 3.68 ± 0.02a | 3.65 ± 0.01 a | 3.50 ± 0.02b |
| Hepatosomatic index (%) | 1.20 ± 0.15c | 1.30 ± 0.14b | 1.50 ± 0.14a | 1.10 ± 0.13c |
| Viscerosomatic index (%) | 3.40 ± 0.31b | 3.80 ± 0.21a | 3.70 ± 0.41a | 3.10 ± 0.21c |
| Fulton’s condition factor | 2.80 ± 0.0a | 2.90 ± 0.1a | 2.80 ± 0.0a | 2.20 ± 0.0b |
| Survival rate (%) | 100.00 ± 0.0 | 100.00 ± 0.0 | 98.00 ± 0.0 | 100.00 ± 0.0 |
Fig. 2The optimum supplementation of Neem extract in the dietary protein level of rainbow trout determined by the phenomenal regression.
Proximate composition of rainbow trout O. mykiss (whole carcass) treated with different formulated feeds. Data are represented as mean ± standard values for all treatments. Values with different superscript in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
| Treatments | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude proteins (%) | Carbohydrates (%) | Total lipids (%) | Ash (%) | Total fibre (%) | Moisture (%) | Dry matter (%) | |
| T1 | 70.18 ± 2.70a | 8.83 ± 0.10c | 9.17 ± 1.00c | 11.45 ± 0.90c | 0.37 ± 0.05a | 0.35 ± 0.04c | 99.65 ± 0.08a |
| T 2 | 68.00 ± 1.70b | 9.05 ± 0.90c | 8.53 ± 1.30c | 14.21 ± 0.80b | 0.21 ± 0.01b | 0.64 ± 0.06b | 99.36 ± 0.06a |
| T 3 | 65.84 ± 1.60b | 13.63 ± 0.30a | 10.59 ± 0.90b | 9.53 ± 0.60d | 0.41 ± 0.02a | 0.17 ± 0.04d | 99.82 ± 0.04a |
| T4 (Control) | 61.9 ± 1.20c | 10.55 ± 0.08b | 11.20 ± 0.50a | 16.11 ± 0.40a | 0.24 ± 0.03b | 1.50 ± 0.34a | 99.98 ± 0.03a |
Physicochemical parameters of water samples collected from different treatment groups of rainbow trout, O. mykiss. Data are presented as Mean ± Standard deviation. Values with different superscript in the same raw indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
| Parameters | T1 (5%) | T2 (7%) | T3 (10%) | Control (T4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | 14.9 ± 0.3a | 15.0 ± 0.3a | 15.0 ± 0.2a | 14.5 ± 0.2a |
| pH | 7.0 ± 0.1a | 7.1 ± 0.1a | 7.1 ± 0.1a | 6.9 ± 0.1a |
| Total hardness | 110.7 ± 1.3b | 110.9 ± 1.8b | 116.0 ± 1.3ab | 122.6 ± 1.0a |
| Total ammonia (mg L−1) | 0.4 ± 0.3b | 0.5 ± 0.2b | 0.8 ± 0.3a | 0.5 ± 0.1b |
| Dissolved oxygen (mgL−1) | 6.5 ± 0.3a | 6.5 ± 0.2a | 6.7 ± 0.4a | 6.2 ± 0.1a |
| Electrical conductivity (mScm1) | 2.9 ± 0.2a | 2.7 ± 0.1a | 2.6 ± 0.1a | 2.5 ± 0.1a |