| Literature DB >> 35002422 |
Rukhsana Syed1, Zubia Masood1, Habib Ul Hassan2,3, Wali Khan4, Safia Mushtaq3, Amjad Ali5, Yasmeen Gul6, Halima Jafari7, Ahasan Habib8, Muhammad Ishaq Ali Shah9, Karim Gabol2, Hina Gul1, Asim Ullah10.
Abstract
A 105-day experimental trial was conducted to assess different levels of dietary Aleo vera extract supplementation on water quality parameters, proximate composition, growth performance and haematological parameters of fry Oreochromis niloticus. Four different percentages of dietary leaf extract powder of Aleo vera (ALE) with a basal feed, designated as, i.e., T0 (Control group; without ALE), T1 (1% ALE), T2 (2% ALE), and T3 (3% ALE). Fish fry was reared in concrete tanks (7.0 m, 1.6 m, 1.0: L, W, H; water volume 11.2 m3/tank), with an average initial weight 4.04 ± 0.03 g/ fry, and each treatment was triplicated. Fry was randomly distributed at a stocking rate of 450 individuals/ tanks. The water quality parameters revealed that temperature, pH, salinity, dissolved oxygen (DO) and nitrates were found in a promising range as given by FAO/WHO limits. However, the record values obtained for Electric Conductivity (EC), Total dissolved solids (TDS), and alkalinities were not found in all tanks' suitable range according to FAO/WHO limits. The results revealed a significant impact of different percentages of dietary ALE supplementation on fry's body composition and haematological parameters. Moreover, the final body weight, final body length, average daily weight gain (g), net weight gain (g) and specific growth rate (%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in T1 and T2 compared with T0 and T3 treatments. The poorest feed conversion ratio was recorded in the T2 group compared with other treatments. Thus, the current study provides information about the nutritional quality of Nile tilapia culturing in Pakistan.Entities:
Keywords: ADWG, Average Daily Weight Gain; ALE, Aloe vera; ANOVA, Analysis of Variance; DE, Digestible Energy; DM, Dry Matter; DP, Digestible Protein; EAA, Essential Amino Acid(s); EFA, Essential Fatty Acid; FA, Fatty Acid(s); FBL, Final Body Length; FBW, Final Body Weight; FCR, Feed Conversion Ratio; FM, Fish Meal; Growth performance; HSI, Hepatosomatic Index; IBL, Initial Body Length; IBW, Initial Body Weight; Immune response; K, Condition Factor; Leaf extract; PER, Protein Efficiency Ratio; PO, Crude Palm Oil; Proximate composition; RO, Rapeseed Oil; SGR, Specific Growth Rate; VO, Vegetable Oil(s); VSI, Viscerosomatic Index; WG, Weight Gain
Year: 2021 PMID: 35002422 PMCID: PMC8716900 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fish feed composition with different doses of dried Aloe vera leaf extract used for four experimental trials.
| Ingredient used/100 g feed | Control group diet % | Experimental group diets | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0(0%) | T1 (1%) | T2 (2%) | T3 (3%) | |
| Fish meal (g) | 39.01 | 39.01 | 39.01 | 39.01 |
| Corn gluten (30 % CP) | 40.54 | 40.54 | 40.54 | 40.54 |
| Cotton seed meal (g) | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.72 |
| Rice polish (g) | 7.17 | 7.17 | 7.17 | 7.17 |
| Wheat bran(g) | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Sun flower oil (mL) | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.56 | 3.56 |
| Vitamins-mineral premix (quantity in g/2.5 kg) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Dried leaf extract of Aloe vera (g) | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
Tilapia Fish feed ingredients and composition used during 105 days experimental trials.
| Ingredients | Ingredients of CP % | CP %Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| Wheat bran | 14 | 3.36 |
| Rice polish | 12 | 2.88 |
| Cotton seed meal | 40.95 | 1.64 |
| Corn gluten | 28.50 | 2.85 |
| Fish meal | 56.72 | 10 |
| Sun flower oil | _ | 0.00 |
| Mineral premix | _ | 0.00 |
| Soya bean meal | 46.60 | 9.32 |
| Total | 30.05 |
Shown the average values and ranged of water quality parameters measured during 105 days trial for the four experimental ponds of this study.
| Water Parameters | Mean ± S.D | Range | WHO/FAO limits | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | 22.78 ± 0.05 | 22.7–22.8 | 20 to 36 °C | ( |
| Dissolved Oxygen (DO) mg/L | 5.66 ± 2.83 | 5.66–5.7 | 3 to 5 mg/L | ( |
| Salinity (g/L) | 0.79 ± 0.11 | 0.68–0.9 | 0.5 to 2.5 g/L | ( |
| pH | 7.70 ± 0.12 | 7.6–7.8 | 5.5 to 9.5 | ( |
| Electric Conductivity (EC) µS/cm | 2354.5 ± 65.03 | 2307.6–2445.5 | 100 to 2000 μS/cm | ( |
| Total Dissolve Solids | 1353.8 ± 186.37 | 1077.1–1464.8 | <400 ppm | ( |
| Nitrates | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 0.19–0.21 | 0.2 to 219 mg/l | ( |
| Alkalinity | 379.0 ± 28.07 | 338.4–401.6 | 20 mg/l | ( |
Fig. 1Water temperature (T) of four experimental fish tanks.
Fig. 2Dissolved oxygen of four experimental fish tanks.
Fig. 3Salinity of four experimental fish tanks.
Fig. 4Water pH of four experimental fish tanks.
Fig. 5Electric conductivity of four experimental fish tanks.
Fig. 6Total dissolved solids of four experimental fish tanks.
Fig. 7Nitrates of four experimental fish tanks.
Fig. 8Total alkalinity of four experimental fish tanks.
Proximate composition of Oreochromis niloticus whole fish (carcass) of four experimental fish ponds from (initial and final exp.)15 th July to 15 th September 2020
| Ingredients (%) | Initial | C(T0) | T1 | T2 | T3 | Permissible range (WHO) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 95.78 ± 0.24 | 93.5ab ± 0.21 | 94.0ab ± 0.20 | 95.0a ± 0.5 | 93.0b ± 0.56 | 78.9 ± 0.5 | ( |
| Ash | 2.50 ± 0.11 | 2.7 ± 0.20 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 2.5 ± 0.22 | 2.7 ± 0.57 | 2.6 ± 0.2 | ( |
| Crude Lipid | 2.10 ± 0.16 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.10 | 2.7 ± 0.25 | 2.5 ± 0.40 | 5.0 ± 12.0 | ( |
| Crude Protein | 60.14 ± 2.16 | 65.0ab ± 4.01 | 67.0ab ± 0.5 | 70.0a ± 0.30 | 60.0b ± 1.05 | 30.0 ± 40.0 | ( |
Values are the mean ± SD of groups in the same row with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Effects of Aloe vera on growth, feed utilization and survival indices of Oreochromis niloticus
| Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight IBW (g) | 4.0 ± 0.01a | 4.0 ± 0.03a | 4.0 ± 0.01a | 4.0 ± 0.02a |
| Final body weight FBW (g) | 77.0 ± 0.21a | 82.6 ± 0.64b | 78.0 ± 0.66c | 74.7 ± 0.63b |
| Specific growth rate (%d-1) | 2.98 ± 0.04a | 3.03 ± 0.06b | 2.99 ± 0.50c | 2.96 ± 0.50b |
| Feed conversion ratio | 0.68 ± 0.12a | 0.69 ± 0.32b | 0.66 ± 0.01a | 0.72 ± 0.32b |
| Feed conversion efficiency | 7.059 ± 0.02a | 7.058 ± 0.02a | 7.062 ± 0.012a | 7.054 ± 0.01a |
| Average daily weight gain (g/day) | 0.69 ± 0.00a | 0.74 ± 0.01b | 0.70 ± 0.00a | 0.67 ± 0.01b |
| Net weight gain (g) | 73.0 ± 0.20a | 78.70 ± 0.80b | 74.01 ± 0.65c | 70.7 ± 0.62b |
| Hepatosomatic index | 3.10 ± 0.1a | 3.21 ± 0.2a | 3.02 ± 0.1a | 3.41 ± 0.2a |
| Viscerosomatic index | 4.20 ± 0.3a | 4.70 ± 0.2b | 3.80 ± 0.2c | 4.90 ± 0.2b |
| Survival % | 89.76 ± 0.02a | 97.82 ± 0.01b | 92.88 ± 0.03b | 90.72 ± 0.03c |
Haematological analysis of Oreochromis niloticus in four experimental fish ponds during the study period
| Hemoglobin/µL | 7.65 ± 0.04a | 7.7 ± 0.07b | 10.85 ± 0.06b | 7.8 ± 0.07b |
| TLC/µL | 48,900 ± 8.44a | 54800 ± 8.54b | 76000 ± 9.62c | 56000 ± 9.64b |
| Neutrophils % | 6 ± 0.99a | 8 ± 0.98b | 7.5 ± 1.55b | 6.5 ± 0.89a |
| Lymphocytes% | 90 ± 1.16a | 89 ± 0.88b | 90.5 ± 0.81a | 89.5 ± 0.92b |
| Monocytes % | 1.5 ± 0.66a | 1.5 ± 0.64a | 1.5 ± 0.88b | 1.5 ± 0.86b |
| Eosinophil’s% | 2.5 ± 0.66a | 2.5 ± 0.60a | 2.5 ± 0.88b | 2.0 ± 0.99b |
| Platelets count/µL | 135,500 ± 10.043a | 154500 ± 8.043a | 149500 ± 9.043a | 44500 ± 6.043a |
| Total RBC/µL | 1.42 ± 0.05a | 1.32 ± 0.04 a | 2.28 ± 0.06 a | 1.44 ± 0.05 a |
| HCT (%) | 23.05 ± 0.20a | 21.05 ± 0.30a | 31.02 ± 0.20a | 21.5 ± 0.40a |
| MCV | 163.1 ± 2.52a | 161.9 ± 0.54a | 158.65 ± 0.66b | 147.1 ± 0.52b |
| MCH | 53.95 ± 0.56a | 54.6 ± 0.56a | 53.5 ± 0.56a | 56.35 ± 0.56a |
| MCHC | 28.65 ± 0.26a | 35.22 ± 0.24a | 36.3 ± 0.16a | 37.25 ± 0.18a |
| WBC count/µL | 5.9 ± 0.8a | 7.6 ± 0.94b | 8.9 ± 1.52c | 7.9 ± 1.53c |
| albumin(g/L) | 4.8 ± 0.22a | 4.15 ± 0.24a | 4.3 ± 0.23a | 4.35 ± 0.24a |
| Globulin(g/L) | 2.3 ± 0.99a | 2.55 ± 0.99a | 2.7 ± 0.99a | 2.9 ± 0.99a |
| Total protein(g/L) | 6.4 ± 0.86a | 7.2 ± 0.88a | 7.6 ± 0.96b | 7.4 ± 0.99b |