| Literature DB >> 35530623 |
Sikkandarkani Akbar1, V John Tamilarasan1, Kannupal Srinivasan1.
Abstract
The chalcones derived from o-alkynylacetophenones and aromatic aldehydes (yne-enones) when heated under reflux with iodine in acetic acid gave a range of benzo[a]fluorenone derivatives in moderate to good yields. The transformation involves the formation of a vinyl indenone intermediate through regioselective alkyne hydration and intramolecular aldol condensation followed by electrocyclic ring closure and aromatization. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35530623 PMCID: PMC9069471 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02376c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Structures of fluostatin natural products.
Scheme 1Present synthesis of benzo[a]fluorenones and comparison with literature reports.
Scheme 2Preparation of starting materials.
Optimization of the reaction conditions
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Entry | Reagents (equiv.) and conditions | Yield of 2a |
| 1 | I2 (1.0), AcOH, reflux, 12 h | 75 |
| 2 | I2 (0.5), AcOH, reflux, 24 h | 33 |
| 3 | I2 (0.3), AcOH, reflux, 24 h | 10 |
| 4 | I2 (1.5), AcOH, reflux, 12 h | 75 |
| 5 | I2 (2.0), AcOH, reflux, 12 h | 73 |
| 6 | I2 (1.0), EtOH, reflux, 24 h | NR |
| 7 | I2 (1.0), 1,2-DCE, reflux, 24 h | NR |
| 8 | I2 (1.0), THF, reflux, 24 h | NR |
| 9 | NIS (1.0), AcOH, reflux, 24 h | NR |
| 10 | ICl (1.0), AcOH, reflux, 24 h | NR |
| 11 | PhI(OAc)2 (1.0), AcOH, reflux, 24 h | 28 |
| 12 | IBX (1.0), AcOH, reflux, 24 h | 15 |
No reaction takes place at room temperature.
Isolated yield.
No reaction.
Synthesis of various benzo[a]fluorenone derivatives from yne-enonesa
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | R1, R2, R3, R4, Ar/H | Time (h) | Yield |
| 1 | H, H, H, H, Ph (1a) | 12 | 75 (2a) |
| 2 | H, H, H, H, 4-MeC6H4 (1b) | 11 | 68 (2b) |
| 3 | H, H, H, H, 4-MeOC6H4 (1c) | 9 | 70 (2c) |
| 4 | H, H, H, H, 4-N(Me)2-C6H4 (1d) | 12 | 65 (2d) |
| 5 | H, H, H, H, 4-BrC6H4 (1e) | 12 | 80 (2e) |
| 6 | H, H, H, H, 4-NO2C6H4 (1f) | 24 | 50 (2f) |
| 7 | H, H, H, H, 1-naphthyl (1g) | 10 | 75 (2g) |
| 8 | H, H, H, H, 2-furyl (1h) | 11 | 57 (2h) |
| 9 | H, H, H, H, 2-pyrrolyl (1i) | 12 | 65 (2i) |
| 10 | H, H, H, H, 1-methyl-2-pyrrolyl (1j) | 12 | 67 (2j) |
| 11 | H, H, H, H, 2-thienyl (1k) | 11 | 60 (2k) |
| 12 | H, H, H, H, H (1l) | 9 | 55 (2l) |
| 13 | H, H, H, 3-Me, Ph (1m) | 10 | 60 (2m) |
| 14 | H, H, H, 4-Me, Ph (1n) | 12 | 73 (2n) |
| 15 | H, H, H, 3-OMe, Ph, (1o) | 12 | 62 (2o) |
| 16 | H, H, H, 4-OMe, Ph, (1p) | 12 | — |
| 17 | H, H, H, 4-Cl, Ph (1q) | 12 | 74 (2q) |
| 18 | Br, H, H, H, Ph (1r) | 12 | 70 (2r) |
| 19 | Br, H, Br, H, Ph (1s) | 12 | 61 (2s) |
The reaction was conducted with 1 (0.25 mmol), I2 (1.0 equiv.) and solvent (5 mL).
Isolated yield.
Complicated mixture.
Contains ca. 7% inseparable impurity.
Fig. 2X-ray structure of 2b (30% probability level).
Scheme 3Control experiments.
Scheme 4Proposed mechanism of the reaction.