| Literature DB >> 35530411 |
Usuk Jung1, Minjeong Kim1, Tao Wang2, Jae-Sung Lee1, Seongwon Seo3, Hong-Gu Lee1.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate candidate proteins related to long-term caloric restriction and feed efficiency in bovine longissimus dorsi muscle (LM). A total of 31 Korean native steers were randomly distributed to ad libitum (n = 16) or caloric restriction group (n = 15) to conduct two feeding trials for 13 mon. In the first trial (10-18 mon of age), steers were fed with 100% ad libitum (NEg = 0.63 Mcal/kg) or caloric restriction (80% of the previous day's feed intake of ad libitum group). In the second trial (18-23 mon of age), the energy value of 100% ad libitum diet was 1.13 Mcal/kg NEg and those in caloric restriction group diet was 0.72 Mcal/kg NEg. At the endpoint of this experiment, in each group, 6 animals were selected with high (n = 3) or low feed efficiency (n = 3) to collect muscle tissue samples (6 animals/group). From muscle tissues of 23 mo of age, we excavated 9 and 12 differentially expressed (two-fold or more) proteins in a nutritional group and feed efficiency group using two-dimensional electrophoresis, respectively. Of these proteins, heat shock protein beta-6 was up-regulated in both the caloric restriction and the low feed efficiency group. In bovine embryonic fibroblasts, the mRNA expression of heat shock protein beta-6 increased after adipogenic differentiation, however, decreased after myogenic differentiation. Our data provide that heat shock protein beta-6 may be an adipogenic protein involved in the mechanism of caloric restriction and feed efficiency in the LM of the steer. © Copyright 2022 Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology.Entities:
Keywords: Caloric restriction; Feed efficiency; Heat shock protein beta-6; Longissimus dorsi muscle; Proteomics; Steer
Year: 2022 PMID: 35530411 PMCID: PMC9039946 DOI: 10.5187/jast.2022.e19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Technol ISSN: 2055-0391
Diet formulation and chemical composition (g/kg DM or as stated) of experimental diets
| 14 mon of age | 23 mon of age | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Caloric restriction | |
| Ingredients | |||
| Barley straw pellet | 26 | ||
| Corn silage | 108 | ||
| Klein grass hay | 203 | ||
| Rice straw | 80 | ||
| Wheat bran | 62 | ||
| Corn (flaked) | 191 | ||
| Corn gluten feed | 38 | ||
| Tapioca | 75 | ||
| Alfalfa hay | 21 | 68 | 100 |
| Timothy hay | 72 | 268 | 397 |
| Ryegrass hay | 126 | ||
| Bluegrass hay | 201 | 298 | |
| Oat straw | 139 | 205 | |
| Wheat straw | |||
| Corn (fine) | 140 | ||
| Soybean meal | 8 | ||
| Wheat (fine) | 164 | ||
| Limestone (fine) | 11 | ||
| Mineral vitamin mix | 1 | ||
| Chemical composition | |||
| DM (g/kg) | 636 | 609 | 637 |
| Crude protein | 95 | 125 | 98 |
| Ether extract | 24 | 32 | 25 |
| Neutral detergent fibre | 585 | 301 | 573 |
| Acid detergent fibre | 413 | 201 | 343 |
| Acid detergent lignin | 61 | 39 | 68 |
| NDICP | 30 | 4 | 0 |
| ADICP | 17 | 1 | 0 |
| Ash | 82 | 51 | 54 |
| Net energy for gain (Mcal/kg) | 0.63 | 1.13 | 0.72 |
DM, dry matter; NDICP, neutral detergent insoluble crude protein; ADICP, acid detergent insoluble crude protein.
Effects of caloric restriction and feed efficiency on growth performance
| Trait | Age | Nutritional
level[ | Feed
efficiency[ | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Restriction | HF | LF | N | FE | N | FE | ||
| Initial BW (kg) | 10 | 294.4 | 289.3 | 288.2 | 318.7 | 9.80 | 14.10 | ns | ns |
| Medium BW (kg) | 14 | 370.9 | 338.1 | 355.2 | 380.7 | 12.29 | 20.81 |
| ns |
| Final BW (kg) | 23 | 538.8 | 451.0 | 522.0 | 498.2 | 13.57 | 39.76 |
|
|
| Daily feed intake (kg/d) | 10–14 | 12.7 | 11.4 | 10.8 | 13.4 | 0.49 | 62.12 |
| ns |
| 15–23 | 13.8 | 11.5 | 11.1 | 14.1 | 0.67 | 67.64 |
| ns | |
| 10–23 | 13.6 | 11.8 | 11.0 | 13.9 | 0.55 | 72.84 |
| ns | |
| Average daily gain (g/d) | 10–14 | 642.9 | 410.1 | 563.0 | 521.0 | 45.44 | 1.06 |
| ns |
| 15–23 | 604.2 | 405.7 | 594.7 | 425.7 | 36.78 | 1.52 |
|
| |
| 10–23 | 616.1 | 407.3 | 587.1 | 454.7 | 29.43 | 1.22 |
|
| |
| Feed efficiency (g gain/kg feed) | 10–14 | 51.0 | 36.6 | 52.9 | 38.2 | 4.39 | 5.27 |
| ns |
| 15–23 | 43.6 | 36.6 | 54.4 | 30.5 | 3.89 | 4.64 | ns |
| |
| 10–23 | 45.6 | 36.6 | 53.6 | 32.8 | 3.45 | 4.73 |
|
| |
Steers were fed ad libitum group (n = 16) or caloric restriction group (n = 15).
Steers were assigned to groups with HF (n = 6) and LF (n = 6) regardless of nutritional level.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001.
HF, high feed efficiency; LF, low feed efficiency; BW, body weight; N, nutritional level; FE, feed efficiency; ns, not significant.
Primer sequences specific for the target genes used for real time PCR
| Gene | Accession number[ | Sequence (5′ to 3′) | Length (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSPB6 | NM_001076027 | F:
GGTGTTGCTGGATGTGAAAC | 117 |
| PPARγ2 | Y12420 | F:
CATAATGCCATCAGGTTTGG | 102 |
| Desmin | NM_001081575 | F:
GGACCTGCTCAATGTCAAGA | 109 |
| Beta-actin | NM_173979 | F:
GCGTGGCTACAGCTTCACC | 54 |
Database protein names and accession numbers: NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair; HSPB6, heat shock protein beta-6; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.
Fig. 1.2-DE images derived from longissimus dorsi muscle (LM) of Korean native steer with (A) ad libitum, (B) caloric restriction (CR), (C) high feed efficiency, and (D) low feed efficiency.
Heat shock protein beta-6 (HSPB6) that was differentially expressed more than two-fold is indicated with arrows.
Characterization of candidate proteins affected caloric restriction in Korean native steers
| Spot[ | Name[ | Accession
number[ | MW / pI[ | Score | Sequence coverage (%) | Spot intensity | Fold change[ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Restricted | |||||||
| 1 | Inner membrane protein, mitochondrial | A7E3V3 | 83.05 / 6.37 | 51.03 | 31.38 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.47 |
| 2 | SuLFEotransferase, estrogen-preferring | P19217 | 34.62 / 6.67 | 72.35 | 20.00 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.44 |
| 3 | Myosin 1 | Q9BE40 | 22.29 / 5.57 | 102.41 | 14.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 2.44 |
| 4 | Alpha-1-antiproteinase precursor | P34955 | 46.10 / 6.05 | 14.64 | 16.35 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 2.68 |
| 5 | Alpha-1 antiproteinase | P34955 | 46.10 / 6.05 | 4.55 | 4.81 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 2.32 |
| 6 | Chain Q, Ca model of bovine Tric CCT devrived from A 4.0 AnGSTROM | 3IYG_Q | 55.77 / 5.33 | 27.62 | 22.85 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.46 |
| 7 | Apolipoprotein H | P17690 | 38.25 / 8.53 | 47.64 | 50.63 | 0.38 | 0.80 | 0.48 |
| 8 | Heat shock protein beta-1 | Q3T149 | 22.40 / 5.98 | 22.18 | 40.80 | 0.39 | 0.82 | 0.47 |
| 9 | Heat shock protein beta-6 | Q148F8 | 17.47 / 5.95 | 15.43 | 47.56 | 0.20 | 0.43 | 0.47 |
The spot number refers to Fig. 1.
Database protein names and accession numbers: UniProt (www.uniprot.org).
Molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI) of each protein were determined by 2-DE.
The expression ratios of spot intensity at ad libitum group versus caloric restriction group.
Characterization of candidate proteins affected feed efficiency in Korean native steers
| Spot[ | Name[ | Accession
number[ | MW / pI[ | Score | Sequence coverage (%) | Spot intensity | Fold change[ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HF | LF | |||||||
| 1 | Tenascin X | Q9BE40 | 22.30 / 5.57 | 22.43 | 16.32 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.35 |
| 2 | EH-domain contaning 2 | Q2KJ47 | 61.22 / 5.95 | 17.57 | 15.65 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.32 |
| 3 | Enolase 1 | Q3ZC09 | 47.10 / 7.60 | 47.55 | 28.80 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.44 |
| 4 | Tropomodulin 4 | Q0VC48 | 39.18 / 4.71 | 32.59 | 16.81 | 0.31 | 0.11 | 2.79 |
| 5 | Annexin V | Q3ZCH0 | 73.74 / 5.97 | 47.64 | 50.63 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 0.19 |
| 6 | MyoZ 1 | Q8SQ24 | 31.67 / 9.17 | 32.44 | 33.99 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 2.56 |
| 7 | MLC 1/3 skeletal muscle isoform | A0JNJ5 | 20.93 / 4.96 | 57.99 | 60.42 | 2.08 | 0.20 | 10.33 |
| 8 | Carbonic anhydrase II | P00921 | 29.11 / 6.41 | 24.75 | 35.89 | 0.42 | 0.09 | 4.57 |
| 9 | Desmoplakin | E1BKT9 | 33.24 / 6.47 | 101.97 | 12.63 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.40 |
| 10 | LRRC20 protein | A6qLD3 | 20.71 / 6.22 | 11.30 | 27.17 | 0.00 | 0.15 | |
| 11 | Heat shock protein beta-6 | Q148F8 | 17.47 / 5.95 | 15.39 | 28.66 | 0.52 | 1.14 | 0.45 |
| 12 | Coflin 2 | Q148F1 | 18.74 / 7.66 | 16.229 | 45.18 | 0.00 | 0.42 | |
The spot number refers to Fig. 1.
Database protein names and accession numbers: UniProt (www.uniprot.org).
Molecular weight (MW) and isoelectric point (pI) of each protein were determined by 2-DE.
The expression ratios of spot intensity at high feed efficiency (HF) versus low feed efficiency (LF) group.
Fig. 2.mRNA expression of heat shock protein beta-6 (HSPB6) in longissimus dorsi muscle (LM) of Korean native steer: (A) ad libitum (n = 10) versus caloric restriction (CR, n = 10); (B) high feed efficiency (HF, n = 6) versus low feed efficiency (LF, n = 6).
Values are mean ± SEM.
Fig. 3.mRNA expression of heat shock protein beta-6 (HSPB6) during bovine myogenesis or adipogenesis.
(A) Representative photographs showing phase contrast of BEFS-MyoD. Magnification was 20X (B) mRNA expression of desmin and HSPB6 in BEFS-MyoD cell at the stage of pre- (0 day), initial- (2 days), and post- differentiation (6 days); (C) Representative photographs showing phase contrast of BEFS-PPARγ2. The accumulated lipid droplets were stained using Oil-red O solution. Magnification was 20X; (D) mRNA expression of PPARγ2 and HSPB6 in BEFS-PPARγ2 cell at pre- (0 day), initial- (2 days), and post- differentiation (16 days). Values are mean ± SD (n = 3, a, b and c vs control by Tukey’s test). PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; BEFS, bovine embryonic fibroblasts; MyoD, myogenic differentiation 1.
Analysis of blood variables in Korean native steers
| Item | Nutritional
level[ | Feed efficiency | ± SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Restriction | HF | LF | N | FE | N | FE | |
| Number | 16 | 15 | 6 | 6 | ||||
| Blood cell count | ||||||||
| White blood cell (×103/μL) | 8.8 | 10.5 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 0.75 | 1.10 | * | ns |
| Red blood cell (× 106/μL) | 8.3 | 7.9 | 8.6 | 8.9 | 0.39 | 0.82 | ns | ns |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 12.6 | 11.6 | 11.8 | 12.5 | 0.64 | 1.10 | ns | * |
| Hematocrit (%) | 37.1 | 34.4 | 34.2 | 35.8 | 1.66 | 3.04 | ns | * |
| MCV (fl) | 44.8 | 43.8 | 44.0 | 45.2 | 1.25 | 2.30 | ns | ns |
| MCH (pg) | 15.2 | 14.8 | 14.6 | 15.8 | 0.48 | 0.84 | ns | ns |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 33.9 | 33.8 | 33.2 | 34.9 | 0.56 | 0.67 | ns | ns |
| Platelet (× 103/μL) | 371.1 | 318.8 | 429.4 | 297.5 | 45.20 | 61.87 | ns | ns |
Steers were fed ad libitum group or caloric restriction group.
Probability values for the effect of nutritional level (N) and feed efficiency (FE); (*p < 0.05 and ns = non-significant).
H, high feed efficiency; LF, low feed efficiency; N, nutritional level; FE, feed efficiency; ns, not significant; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration.