| Literature DB >> 35529923 |
Min Wang1, Guoquan Li1, Shanzhi Wang2, Feng Ye1, Yanni Huang3, Huanan Wang1, Feng Guo1.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Gandakang tablets plus methylprednisolone in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35529923 PMCID: PMC9071855 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4797454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Comparison of baseline data between the two groups of patients.
| Groups |
| Gender [ | Age (years) | Course (months) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | ||||
| Observation group | 30 | 4 | 26 | 28.29 ± 2.51 | 22.73 ± 2.15 |
| Control group | 30 | 5 | 25 | 28.23 ± 2.65 | 22.65 ± 1.82 |
|
| 6.876 | 9.867 | 7.253 | ||
|
| 0.652 | 0.672 | 0.867 | ||
Comparison of clinical efficacy between the two groups of patients.
| Groups |
| Markedly effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total efficacy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 30 | 17 | 12 | 1 | 29 (96.67) |
| Control group | 30 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 22 (73.33) |
|
| 4.706 | ||||
|
| 0.030 |
Comparison of SLEDAI scores between the two groups of patients.
| Groups |
| SLEDAI scores | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 30 | 8.85 ± 0.59 | 4.25 ± 0.71 |
| Control group | 30 | 8.81 ± 0.67 | 5.93 ± 0.82 |
|
| 15.653 | 12.980 | |
|
| 0.087 | 0.021 | |
Comparison of immunoglobulins between the two groups of patients.
| Groups |
| IgG (g/L) | IgA (g/L) | IgM (g/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 30 | 7.13 ± 0.35 | 6.32 ± 0.31 | 1.35 ± 0.23 | 1.01 ± 0.05 | 1.33 ± 0.26 | 1.08 ± 0.07 |
| Control group | 30 | 7.26 ± 0.43 | 5.13 ± 0.28 | 1.33 ± 0.24 | 1.19 ± 0.08 | 1.32 ± 0.13 | 1.19 ± 0.05 |
|
| 27.982 | 20.023 | 11.235 | 18.767 | 17.865 | 20.223 | |
|
| 0.541 | 0.012 | 0.623 | 0.032 | 0.232 | 0.003 | |
Comparison of inflammatory factors between the two groups of patients.
| Groups |
| IL-4 (pg/mL) | IL-6 (pg/mL) | TNF- | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 30 | 7.65 ± 0.72 | 3.93 ± 0.68 | 16.66 ± 0.59 | 9.42 ± 0.75 | 139.94 ± 4.23 | 106.26 ± 2.89 |
| Control group | 30 | 7.72 ± 0.79 | 5.08 ± 0.75 | 16.57 ± 0.78 | 11.52 ± 0.84 | 139.98 ± 4.64 | 152.45 ± 4.52 |
|
| 23.231 | 19.076 | 22.563 | 17.023 | 15.043 | 19.765 | |
|
| 0.672 | 0.034 | 0.770 | 0.022 | 0.332 | 0.015 | |
Comparison of adverse reactions between the two groups.
| Groups |
| Headache | Vomiting | Total incidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 30 | 3 | 4 | 7 (23.33%) |
| Observation group | 30 | 3 | 2 | 4 (13.33%) |
|
| 1.002 | |||
|
| 0.317 |
Comparison of symptom remission between the two groups.
| Groups |
| Facial erythema | Joint pain | High fever |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observation group | 30 | 9 | 10 | 13 |
| Control group | 30 | 21 | 27 | 28 |
|
| 9.600 | 20.376 | 17.329 | |
|
| 0.002 | ≤0.001 | ≤0.001 |
Comparison of the quality of life of patients in the two groups before and after treatment.
| Groups |
| Mental health | Emotional role | Physical role | Social functioning | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
| Observation group | 30 | 77.23 ± 5.61 | 92.15 ± 6.63 | 71.76 ± 7.13 | 91.58 ± 7.15 | 61.33 ± 5.46 | 86.18 ± 7.22 | 73.46 ± 6.16 | 90.58 ± 6.15 |
| Control group | 30 | 77.29 ± 5.33 | 82.24 ± 5.97 | 71.69 ± 6.94 | 82.83 ± 6.78 | 61.42 ± 5.53 | 72.45 ± 7.17 | 73.79 ± 5.95 | 82.42 ± 7.78 |
|
| 13.324 | 16.324 | 17.014 | 16.210 | 15.023 | 20.332 | 18.543 | 21.067 | |
|
| 0.456 | 0.021 | 0.650 | 0.013 | 0.322 | 0.012 | 0.765 | 0.028 | |