| Literature DB >> 35529198 |
Li Sha1, Xiaoyan Yu2, Xingxin Liu1, Xiaotong Yan1, Jingxiao Duan1, Yingte Li1, Shuting Zhang1.
Abstract
In this study, the feasibility of electro-dewatering (EDW) as a pretreatment of the subsequent bio-drying process (EB process) was investigated from the point of view of the influence of EDW on the microbial biodegradability of sludge. The results showed that suitable EDW pretreatment was beneficial for microbial growth in the sludge cake, and in the subsequent bio-drying process it increased the metabolic activity of microorganisms. However, electric field strength impacted microbial activity and soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD) of the sludge. As the applied electric field strength increased from 20 to 60 V cm-1, the microbial activity of sludge decreased gradually but SCOD of sludge increased. The specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) at electric field strength of 20 V cm-1 was 8.7% higher than that of raw sludge. EDW pretreatment accelerated the drying rate of bio-drying process, and the final water content of sludge (44%) was 6.3% lower than that of non-pretreated sludge. It was observed that in the bio-drying process with an EDW pretreatment, the first peak temperature of the sludge pile was 58.7 °C at 36 h and the second peak temperature was 48.7 °C at 56 h, whereas that of the non-pretreated sludge was only 46.5 °C at 42 h and 40.3 °C at 62 h, respectively. The EDW sludge incorporating straw as a bulking agent showed promising results during bio-drying. In addition, EDW pretreatment of sludge to improve the bio-drying process showed lower energy consumption and cost. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35529198 PMCID: PMC9070639 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra02920f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1Schematic of (a) the EDW experimental equipment and (b) the bio-drying experimental equipment.
Fig. 2Changes in (a) SCOD and (b) VFAs accumulation.
Fig. 3Performance of (a) untreated control sludge and (b) EDW sludge after microbiological culture.
Fig. 4Effect of EDW on the SOUR of sludge.
Fig. 5Variation of (a) temperature, (b) MC, and (c) VS content in EDW sludge and control sludge during bio-drying.
Fig. 6Effect of bulking agents on (a) temperature, (b) MC, and (c) VS content during bio-drying.
Fig. 7Comparison of energy consumption between EDW process and EB process.
Comparison of moisture content, treatment time, energy consumption, and cost of EB process, thermal drying, composting, and lime drying
| Dewatering process | Moisture content (%) | Treatment time (min) | Energy consumption | Cost ($ | Subsequent combustion or incineration treatment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operating cost | Equipment cost | |||||
| EB process | 79.8–65% | 9 | 40 kW h | 12.5 | 8631.6–11 508.8 | Positive |
| 65–45.9% | 5760 | 14 kW h | ||||
| Thermal drying | 79.8–30% | 30 | 3100–3500 kJ kg−1, 107.5 kW h | 47.6 | 14 386–21 579 | Positive |
| Composting | 65–40% | 23 040–28 800 | 72–90 kW h | 17.3–21.6 | 17 263.2 | Positive |
| Lime drying | 79.8–60% | 7200–11 520 | 42 kW h | 14.4–21.6 | 14 386–17 263 | Negative |
Energy consumption includes heat energy consumption (kJ kg−1) and electricity consumption (kW h traw sludge−1).