| Literature DB >> 35528509 |
Jitian Li1,2, Yan Ma1,2, Yucheng Jiao3,4, Libo Xu3,4, Yage Luo1,2, Jiancheng Zheng3,4, Xingkai Zhang3,4, Zhe Chen3,4.
Abstract
Purpose: The pathological role of axial stress in intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is controversial, and there was no quantified study until now. Here, we tried to clarify the correlation between IDD or low back pain (LBP) and axial stress at different duration and magnitude in vitro and in vivo. Method: In vitro, the gene expression of aggrecan, matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and substance P (SP) was measured when nucleus pulposus cells (NPCs) were compressed under gradual severity. In vivo, a measurable Ilizarov-type compression apparatus was established for single coccygeal (Co) intervertebral disc (IVD) compression of Co7-8 in mouse. Gradient stress was placed at 0.4 Mpa (mild), 0.8 Mpa (moderate), and 1.2 Mpa (severe) for three days to investigate the effect of the magnitude of axial stress. Additionally, mild compression with 3, 7, and 14 days was used to determine the effect of the duration of axial stress. Subsequently, we evaluated the severity of IDD and LBP by radiological X-ray film; histological examination with H&E staining; immunohistochemical analysis with collagen II, aggrecan, and CGRP staining; and western blot analysis with collagen II, aggrecan, MMP-3, and interleukin-1β (IL-1β).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35528509 PMCID: PMC9076309 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1045999
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 7.310
Figure 1Mechanical stress caused gradual IDD and LBP in NPCs. (a, b) NPCs exhibited gradual downregulated expression of ECM-related gene of aggrecan and upregulated expression of IDD-related gene of MMP3, with a time-response manner. (c, d) NPCs had significantly upregulation of LBP-related gene of CGRP and substance P, with a time-response manner. (The data are shown as mean ± SD. ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, and ∗∗∗<0.001when compared among each group. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD multiple comparison test were used for statistical analysis).
Figure 2Illustration of Ilizarov-type compression apparatus in IVD of mouse. (a). Schematic image of an Ilizarov-type coccygeal IVD compression apparatus. (b). General images of an Ilizarov-type compression apparatus produced 400 g axial stress for Co7-8 in the tail of mouse. The force between each springs and the ring was fixed at the same level in turn with sensors. (c). Lateral X-ray evaluation after installation of apparatus.
Figure 3Radiological and histological evaluation of IDD with gradient compression magnitude. (a) X-ray examination showed a gradual narrowing of the intervertebral height in accordance with the severity level of compression pressure. Arrows indicated the targeted IVDs. (b) H-E staining also suggested a gradual severer IDD along with severer compression pressure. (c) Western blot analysis suggested a gradient compression magnitude induced by a gradual decrease of collagen II and aggrecan and increase of IL-1β and MMP3. (d) IHC staining indicated the distribution and content of collagen II and aggrecan decreased along with gradient compression magnitude (the data are shown as mean ± SD. N = 3-5 for each group. ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, and ∗∗∗<0.001 when compared among each group. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD multiple comparison test were used for statistical analysis).
Figure 4Radiological and histological analysis in IDD with gradient compression duration. (a) A gradually narrower intervertebral height in accordance with longer compression duration. White arrows indicated the targeted IVDs. (b) A gradually more severe IDD, along with severer compression pressure, as shown in H-E staining. (c) Western blot analysis suggested that gradient compression magnitude induced a gradual decrease of collagen II and aggrecan and an increase of IL-1β and MMP3. (d) IHC staining indicated the distribution and content of collagen II and aggrecan remarkable decrease with gradient compression magnitude (the data are shown as mean ± SD. N = 3-5 for each group. ∗<0.05, ∗∗<0.01, and ∗∗∗<0.001 when compared among each group. One-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD multiple comparison test were used for statistical analysis).