Literature DB >> 35528310

The Association Between Preclinical Medical Students' Perceptions of the Anatomy Education Environment and Their Learning Approaches.

Haziq Hazman Norman1, Siti Nurma Hanim Hadie2, Najib Majdi Yaacob3, Fazlina Kasim2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to measure medical students' perceptions of the anatomy education environment and determine its association with their learning approaches. First- and second-year undergraduate medical students (N = 234) completed the Anatomy Education Environment Measurement Inventory and the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students. Results revealed that the students' perceptions of all the factors in the anatomy education environment were positive except for two areas-the anatomy learning resources and quality of histology learning facilities. The majority of students in the first year (62.3%) and second year (43.7%) adopted a deep learning approach. There was no significant association between most of the factors in the anatomy education environment and the students' learning approaches, except for the students' intrinsic interest in learning anatomy factor (p = 0.032). The anatomy education environment was positive for the medical students, and there was a prevalence of a deep learning approach among them. However, most of the factors in the anatomy education environment did not influence the students' learning approach. Given that the students' learning approach is a multifactorial construct, investigating the relationship between these two variables in longitudinal time points would provide better insight into the association between the anatomy educational climate and students' learning approaches.
© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to International Association of Medical Science Educators 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Education environment; Learning approach; Learning climate; Medical students

Year:  2022        PMID: 35528310      PMCID: PMC9055004          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-022-01517-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  37 in total

Review 1.  The Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine.

Authors:  C F Smith; G M Finn; J Stewart; M A Atkinson; D C Davies; R Dyball; J Morris; C Ockleford; I Parkin; S Standring; S Whiten; J Wilton; S McHanwell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Exam Success at Undergraduate and Graduate-Entry Medical Schools: Is Learning Style or Learning Approach More Important? A Critical Review Exploring Links Between Academic Success, Learning Styles, and Learning Approaches Among School-Leaver Entry ("Traditional") and Graduate-Entry ("Nontraditional") Medical Students.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Feeley; Deborah L Biggerstaff
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Multimodal education in anatomy: The perfect opportunity.

Authors:  Richard L Drake; Wojciech Pawlina
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Medical education in Malaysia.

Authors:  Victor K E Lim
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program.

Authors:  W D Dupont; W D Plummer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1990-04

6.  Reassessing the educational environment among undergraduate students in a chiropractic training institution: A study over time.

Authors:  Per J Palmgren; Tobias Sundberg; Klara Bolander Laksov
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2015-05-29

7.  Anatomy education environment measurement inventory: A valid tool to measure the anatomy learning environment.

Authors:  Siti Nurma Hanim Hadie; Asma' Hassan; Zul Izhar Mohd Ismail; Mohd Asnizam Asari; Aaijaz Ahmed Khan; Fazlina Kasim; Nurul Aiman Mohd Yusof; Husnaida Abdul Manan Sulong; Tg Fatimah Murniwati Tg Muda; Wan Nor Arifin; Muhamad Saiful Bahri Yusoff
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  A retrospective and prospective look at medical education in the United States: trends shaping anatomical sciences education.

Authors:  Richard L Drake
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 9.  Meta-analysis and review of learner performance and preference: virtual versus optical microscopy.

Authors:  Adam B Wilson; Melissa A Taylor; Barbie A Klein; Megan K Sugrue; Elizabeth C Whipple; James J Brokaw
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Conceptualizing Learning Environments in the Health Professions.

Authors:  Larry D Gruppen; David M Irby; Steven J Durning; Lauren A Maggio
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 6.893

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.