Literature DB >> 35527553

Association of Peripheral Lymphocyte Subsets with Cognitive Decline and Dementia: The Cardiovascular Health Study.

Alison E Fohner1,2, Colleen M Sitlani1, Petra Buzkova3, Margaret F Doyle4, Xiaojuan Liu5, Joshua C Bis1, Annette Fitzpatrick1,6,7, Susan R Heckbert1,2, Sally A Huber4, Lewis Kuller8, William T Longstreth1,9, Matthew J Feinstein10, Matthew Freiberg11, Nels C Olson4, Sudha Seshadri12,13,14, Oscar Lopez15, Michelle C Odden5, Russell P Tracy16,4, Bruce M Psaty1,2,17,18, Joseph A Delaney1,19, James S Floyd1,2,17.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35527553      PMCID: PMC9277688          DOI: 10.3233/JAD-220091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.160


× No keyword cloud information.

INTRODUCTION

Neuroinflammation is implicated in rapid progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and in altered learning and memory [1, 2]. Large scale genomic studies support the role of the immune system in dementia [3-10]. Immune cells have been identified in brain tissue and cerebrospinal fluid of people with AD, and the levels of immune cells in blood may be associated with dementias, perhaps reflecting premature immunosenescence and chronic inflammation [11-18]. For example, higher circulating proportions of natural killer (NK) cells were apparent before AD onset and the depletion of NK cells improved cognitive function in mice [19]. In humans, high NK cell activity was associated with worse cognitive performance of AD patients [14, 20, 21]. Increased numbers of CD8 + T effector memory CD45RA+(CD8 TEMRA) cells and of CD4 + T effector memory CD45RA+(CD4 TEMRA) cells were identified in the blood of patients with AD [12, 22, 23]. Prior studies report both decreased and increased proportions of regulatory T cells (Treg) in blood of patients with AD [22-27]. Immunosenescence of T cells may promote AD by decreasing anti-amyloid antibodies, which could result in less clearance of amyloid plaques [28], or by producing high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress, which could damage neurons [29, 30]. However, many of the associations between peripheral immune cells and cognitive outcomes are based on small, cross-sectional studies. Clarifying the association of the peripheral adaptive and innate immune system with risk for cognitive decline and dementia in a large, population-based setting may illuminate underlying biological processes and lead to the development of better therapeutics. The Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) is a population-based, prospective cohort study that included serial cognitive evaluations, dementia adjudication, and assessment of 18 types of peripheral innate and adaptive immune cell subsets. Importantly, CHS allows evaluation of the association of circulating immune cells with both cross-sectional and longitudinal cognitive and dementia outcomes. We hypothesized a priori that high proportions of NK, and both CD4 + and CD8 + TEMRA cells would be associated with worse prospective cross-sectional global cognition, worse cognitive decline, prevalent dementia, and shorter time to death from dementia. We hypothesized that higher proportions of Treg protect against these adverse cognitive outcomes. We investigated all other available immune cell subsets as exploratory hypotheses to broadly characterize the relationship of the peripheral immune system with cognitive decline and dementia.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Study design and approval

The CHS is a population-based, longitudinal cohort of 5,888 men and women aged 65 years or older at enrollment in 1989–93 [31]. Analytic baseline for this analysis was defined as the 1998–1999 CHS exam because this study leverages immune cell phenotype data obtained [32] from the 1998–1999 exams. Institutional review boards at the University of Washington and at each study site approved the study. All CHS participants provided written informed consent.

Immune cell measurement

Detailed methods for immune cell phenotyping and flow cytometry gating strategies have been published [32, 33]. Briefly, as part of the 1998–1999 exam, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were cryopreserved. Flow cytometry was used to differentiate cell types based on surface marker expression. Cell phenotypes were expressed as proportions of larger “parent” populations, as indicated in Table 2. Poor sample quality and technical assay errors resulted in missing data, which appear to be missing at random. IgG antibodies to cytomegalovirus (CMV) were measured in serum by enzyme immunoassay (Diamedix Corp., Miami Lakes, FL); the inter-assay coefficients of variation of CMV titer were 5.1% –6.8%.
Table 2

Cellular phenotypes with their molecular description, parent population, number of samples with data (N), means and standard deviations (SD)

Cellular phenotypeMolecular descriptionParent populationNMeanSD
Primary hypotheses
Natural killerCD3-CD56 + CD16+% Lymphocytes1,5565.14.8
TregCD4 + CD25 + CD127–CD4+1,5456.64.6
CD4 + TEMRACD4 + CD45RA + CD28-CD57+CD4+1,6706.95.9
CD8 + TEMRACD8 + CD45RA + CD28-CD57+CD8+1,67523.614.1
Exploratory hypotheses
γδ T cellsCD3+γδ+CD3+1,5395.54.9
B cellsCD19+% Lymphocytes1,55619.715.9
T helper cellsCD4+% Lymphocytes1,67350.114.5
Cytotoxic T cellsCD8+% Lymphocytes1,69117.39.7
Th1CD4 + CD194-CXCR3 + CD196–CD4+1,32620.28.0
Th2CD4 + CD194 + CXCR3-CD196–CD4+1,3264.73.8
Th17CD4 + CD194 + CXCR3-CD196+CD4+1,3263.22.6
Naïve CD4 + cellsCD4 + CD45RA+CD4+1,69025.812.6
Memory CD4 + cellsCD4 + CD45RO+CD4+1,69049.715.5
Activated/mature CD4 + cellsCD4 + CD38+CD4+1,68833.415.8
Naïve CD8 + cellsCD8 + CD45RA+CD8+1,70942.616.6
Memory CD8 + cellsCD8 + CD45RO+CD8+1,70230.214.4
Activated/mature CD8 + cellsCD8 + CD38+CD8+1,70734.318.5
Memory B cellsCD19 + CD27+CD19+1,55726.419.8

Cognition and dementia adjudication

Global cognitive performance was assessed with the 100-point Modified Mini Mental State Exam (3MSE) for participants in 1998–1999 and was repeated among participants remaining in the study in 2005–2006. Participants who did not attend an in-person exam were contacted via telephone to complete a Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS) exam. The TICS score explains 67% of variability in 3MSE in CHS and can be used to estimate 3MSE score with a correlation of 0.82 between actual and TICS-estimated 3MSE [34, 35]. We used TICS score to estimate the 3MSE score when 3MSE was missing. TICS was used to estimate one score at the 1998–1999 exam and 194 scores at the 2005–2006 exam. A committee of neurologists and psychiatrists used Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria to adjudicate dementia prior to 1998–1999 [36-38]. Death from dementia was ascertained on all participants through 2015 with evidence of advanced dementia prior to death without evidence of another cause [39].

Statistical analysis

For main analyses we used multiple imputation with chained equations (40 imputations) to impute all missing data, including any missing covariates, cell phenotypes, and cognitive outcomes. We imputed 20 cross-sectional cognitive scores, 996 changes in cognitive score, 402 statuses of prevalent dementia, and 19 times to death with dementia. Data were imputed in blocks of immune cells, covariates, and cognitive outcomes. Additional covariates associated with aging-related outcomes in CHS were included in the imputation process to improve estimates [40-44]. In the main imputed analyses, all participants were included in all analyses. Due to co-linearity, we analyzed each cell phenotype separately, per standard deviation (SD) higher value. Associations between immune cell proportion per 1-SD and both cross-sectional 3MSE score and change in 3MSE between 1998–1999 and 2005–2006 were assessed using linear regression. We used Poisson regression to determine relative risk of prevalent dementia per 1-SD higher immune cell proportion. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine hazard ratio of death from dementia per 1-SD higher immune cell proportion. Censoring occurred at death without noted dementia or in 2015. All analyses were adjusted for age, sex, Black race, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, statin use, education, prevalent diabetes, APOE4 allele carrier status, body mass index (BMI), CMV antibody titer, assay batch, and study site. In exploratory analyses, we repeated all analyses stratified by sex. In sensitivity analyses, we excluded 135 participants who had experienced a stroke prior to the 1998–1999 exam. To identify potential influence of imputed missing data, we performed complete case analysis for associations between immune cell proportion and three outcomes: cross-sectional cognitive function, prevalent dementia, and time-to-death from dementia. We weighted individuals with 2005–2006 data by the inverse probability of the likelihood of having cognitive scores in 2005–2006 to perform a sensitivity analysis of the association of immune cell proportions and seven-year change in cognitive function [45]. For main endpoints, a p-value less than 0.0125 was considered significant to account for the four primary cell types assessed. All other analyses were exploratory and a p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. We conducted all analyses in RStudio (R version 3.6.3). The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request through the CHS Coordinating Center (CHS-NHLBI.org).

RESULTS

Our analysis included 1928 CHS participants with at least one peripheral immune subset measured. Table 1 presents their characteristics at analytic baseline. Cognitive evaluations were performed seven years later in a subset of 932 (48%) participants and scores declined a mean of 6.5 points (standard deviation = 9.7). Over 16 years of follow up, 272 (14%) participants died from dementia. Table 2 presents immune cells as proportions of their parent population.
Table 1

Characteristics of CHS subjects with immune cell data (n = 1928) at analytic baseline

VariableMean or numberStandard deviation (SD) or %
Age, y (mean, SD)79.74.4
Male (n, %)73238.0%
Black (n, %)33917.6%
Study site (n, %)
  North Carolina53627.8%
  California52127.0%
  Maryland41021.3%
  Pittsburgh46123.9%
Education past grade 12 (n, %)94048.8%
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg (mean, SD)135.220.5
Smoking status (n, %)
  Current1516.6%
  Never93844.1%
  Former83949.3%
At least one APOE4 allele (n, %)53429.0%
BMI, kg/m2 (mean, SD)26.64.4
Prior Stroke (n, %)1357.0%
Diabetes (n, %)37219.4%
Statin user (n, %)30715.9%
CMV antibody titer, EU/mL (mean, SD)190.3183.6
Prevalent dementia (n, %)56336.9%
3MSE (mean, SD)90.411.6

* percentages based on number of participants with data for that variable. No data were missing for age, sex, race, study site, presence of prior stroke, or statin use. The number of missing observations for the other variables are as follows: 3 for level of education, 1 for blood pressure, 25 for smoking status, 84 for APOE4 genotype, 143 for BMI, 10 for prevalent diabetes, 189 for CMV antibody titer, 402 for prevalent dementia, and 1 for 3MSE cognitive score.

Characteristics of CHS subjects with immune cell data (n = 1928) at analytic baseline * percentages based on number of participants with data for that variable. No data were missing for age, sex, race, study site, presence of prior stroke, or statin use. The number of missing observations for the other variables are as follows: 3 for level of education, 1 for blood pressure, 25 for smoking status, 84 for APOE4 genotype, 143 for BMI, 10 for prevalent diabetes, 189 for CMV antibody titer, 402 for prevalent dementia, and 1 for 3MSE cognitive score. Cellular phenotypes with their molecular description, parent population, number of samples with data (N), means and standard deviations (SD) Table 3 presents associations between each immune cell proportion and both cross-sectional cognitive function and longitudinal change in cognitive function after seven years using imputed data where missing. No immune cell proportions were associated with any cognitive outcomes after accounting for multiple comparisons of the primary cell types. However, higher proportions of Treg were associated with greater decline in cognitive function over seven years if not accounting for multiple comparisons. This association was supported by suggestive associations of higher proportions of Treg with both worse cross-sectional cognitive function and higher risk of prevalent dementia. Supplementary Table 1 presents sensitivity analyses using complete case analysis for cross-sectional cognitive function (no missing data were imputed) and inverse probability weighting for change in cognitive function. These analyses were similarly null.
Table 3

Associations of lymphocyte subsets (per 1 SD) with cognitive outcomes. Analyses for cross-sectional 3MSE score and change in 3MSE score over seven years are based on multiple linear regression. Analysis of prevalent dementia is based on Poisson regression. Analysis of time to death from dementia is based on Cox proportional hazards regression. All analyses adjust for age, sex, Black race, systolic blood pressure, smoking, statin use, education, prevalent diabetes, APOE4 carrier status, BMI, CMV antibody titer, assay batch, and study site. Participants were censored at death without dementia or in 2015. All 1928 individuals are included in each analysis. Missing data were imputed, including covariates (see Table 1), immune cells (see Table 2), and outcomes. We imputed 20 cross-sectional cognitive scores, 996 changes in cognitive score, 402 statuses of prevalent dementia, and 19 times to death with dementia. Beta values that are negative indicate lower cognitive score and a greater decline in cognition over 7 years

Cross-sectional 3 MSE scoreChange over seven yearsCross-sectional dementiaTime to dementia death
Cellular phenotypeBeta95% CI p Beta95% CI p Relative Risk95% CI p Hazard Ratio95% CI p
Natural killer 0.06 –1.71, 1.84 0.94 –0.09 –3.90, 3.73 0.96 1.15 0.77, 1.70 0.50 1.16 0.80, 1.69 0.44
Treg –0.52 –1.08, 0.03 0.065 –1.30 –2.36, –0.24 0.018 1.10 0.99, 1.22 0.086 1.13 0.78, 1.64 0.52
CD4 + TEMRA –0.12 –0.80, 0.55 0.72 0.47 –0.80, 1.73 0.47 0.98 0.83, 1.16 0.82 1.07 0.76, 1.52 0.68
CD8 + TEMRA 0.05 –0.55, 0.65 0.86 0.24 –0.91, 1.39 0.68 1.03 0.91, 1.18 0.63 1.05 0.74, 1.49 0.79
γδ T cells0.41–1.81, 2.620.72–0.93–4.85, 2.990.641.000.66, 1.500.981.060.75, 1.500.76
B cells0.26–0.22, 0.730.290.08–0.85, 1.010.860.970.87, 1.080.541.100.77, 1.570.60
T helper cells–0.15–0.33, 0.020.09–0.03–0.37, 0.310.861.010.97, 1.050.741.080.76, 1.530.67
Cytotoxic T cells0.11–0.02, 0.250.09–0.07–0.31, 0.170.561.010.98, 1.040.701.080.76, 1.540.67
Th10.14–0.17, 0.460.38–0.25–0.87, 0.370.440.990.92, 1.060.791.080.76, 1.530.67
Th2–0.12–2.51, 2.280.921.59–4.50, 7.680.610.990.57, 1.710.971.080.75, 1.550.68
Th170.34–2.88, 3.560.841.51–2.14, 5.160.420.990.53, 1.840.971.080.76, 1.530.68
Naïve CD4 + cells0.12–0.42, 0.660.670.14–0.86, 1.150.780.900.79, 1.030.141.000.70, 1.430.99
Memory CD4 + cells–0.04–0.39, 0.300.81–0.13–0.83, 0.560.711.060.97, 1.150.191.010.71, 1.440.97
Activated/mature CD4 + cells0.10–0.45, 0.640.730.24–0.73, 1.200.630.950.84, 1.080.451.090.77, 1.550.62
Naïve CD8 + cells0.06–0.06, 0.170.33–0.13–0.36, 0.090.240.990.96, 1.020.471.080.76, 1.530.66
Memory CD8 + cells–0.25–0.59, 0.100.160.21–0.41, 0.820.511.040.96, 1.130.291.090.77, 1.540.64
Activated/mature CD8 + cells0.10–0.45, 0.640.730.34–0.80, 1.480.560.970.85, 1.100.601.060.71, 1.570.79
Memory B cells–0.15–0.74, 0.450.63–1.00–2.29, 0.300.131.090.96, 1.230.211.160.81, 1.670.42

p-value threshold for the primary endpoints is 0.0125. Bolded cells are primary hypotheses. CI, Confidence Interval.

Associations of lymphocyte subsets (per 1 SD) with cognitive outcomes. Analyses for cross-sectional 3MSE score and change in 3MSE score over seven years are based on multiple linear regression. Analysis of prevalent dementia is based on Poisson regression. Analysis of time to death from dementia is based on Cox proportional hazards regression. All analyses adjust for age, sex, Black race, systolic blood pressure, smoking, statin use, education, prevalent diabetes, APOE4 carrier status, BMI, CMV antibody titer, assay batch, and study site. Participants were censored at death without dementia or in 2015. All 1928 individuals are included in each analysis. Missing data were imputed, including covariates (see Table 1), immune cells (see Table 2), and outcomes. We imputed 20 cross-sectional cognitive scores, 996 changes in cognitive score, 402 statuses of prevalent dementia, and 19 times to death with dementia. Beta values that are negative indicate lower cognitive score and a greater decline in cognition over 7 years p-value threshold for the primary endpoints is 0.0125. Bolded cells are primary hypotheses. CI, Confidence Interval. Additionally, no immune cell proportions were associated with prevalent dementia or time to death from dementia (Table 3). Supplementary Table 1 presents sensitivity analyses, using complete case analysis for both prevalent dementia and time to death from dementia. We did not observe associations between immune cell subsets and any of the outcomes in analyses stratified by sex, when excluding participants with stroke prior to blood collection, or when evaluating prevalent AD specifically rather than all-cause dementia. Exploratory analysis using principal components of the immune cell distributions did not identify significant associations.

DISCUSSION

In a large, population-based, longitudinal cohort of older adults with well-defined outcomes, we did not identify associations of peripheral immune cells with either cross-sectional or longitudinal cognitive outcomes after accounting for multiple comparisons. However, there were marginally significant associations of Treg with worse cognitive decline in both imputed and weighted probability models when not accounting for multiple comparisons, and this association was supported by suggestive associations of Treg with both worse cross-sectional cognitive function and prevalent dementia. Higher proportions of Treg may reflect ongoing mobilization in response to inflammation. The immune cell subsets that we measured at a single timepoint in blood may not reflect features of the immune system most important for cognitive decline, or dynamic temporal intrapersonal variability in cell levels. Overall numbers, activity, or location of immune cells may better reflect pathology than immune cell proportions in peripheral blood. For example, all B and CD4 + T cell count may be diminished in dementia, which may not be captured when evaluating proportions [13, 18]. Treg and NK cells from patients with AD are reported to have altered function [14, 20, 21, 46]. Neurodegeneration may be driven by proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines produced by the immune cells [47]. For example, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα are thought to induce neuronal death [47]. Additionally, we may not have evaluated all relevant immune cell subphenotypes. For example, specific Treg subtypes might be more associated with pathologies than proportions of Treg overall [26]. Furthermore, cells may act in concert to affect cognitive decline and AD [48-50], and we have evaluated each cell type independently. Peripheral immune cells may not reflect immune cells in the brain and cerebrospinal fluid, which may be more important for cognitive decline and dementia. The role of the immune system may vary by type of dementia [13]. NK cells may be diminished in vascular dementia, but not in AD, and the distribution of naïve and memory T cells may be altered only in AD [13]. The majority of dementia in CHS was AD, but ∼25% had vascular dementia and ∼10% had mixed dementia based on adjudicated diagnoses. Our dementia endpoint included all dementia subtypes and limiting our analysis to adjudicated AD did not affect our findings. Other limitations of the study include large amounts of missing data and that participants with cognitive data are known to be healthier than those without cognitive data or who did not survive to the 1998–1999 exam. Survival and participation bias is especially likely to affect longitudinal analysis of cognitive decline, where participants experiencing greater cognitive decline were less likely to be re-examined in follow-up. We attempted to account for missing data through multiple imputation with chained equations and with probability weighting based on likelihood of participation in the follow up exam, but selection bias remains a concern. Nonetheless, sensitivity analyses were also null. Other sources of bias include that death from dementia is specific, but not sensitive, and we likely underestimated the number of participants who died with dementia. Immune cells were measured at only one time point, several years after cohort development. Participants must have survived and been healthy enough to participate in a blood draw during the 1998–1999 exam. These older participants may already have experienced changes in their immune system that could affect cognitive function and decline. The role of the immune system in dementia is likely complex. While neuroinflammation is well established with respect to AD, anti-inflammatory therapy for AD has had poor results [51]. Our findings that peripheral immune cells, measured as proportions, are not associated with cross-sectional global cognition, cognitive decline, prevalent dementia, or time to death with dementia may reflect the complexity of both the immune system and its role in AD and related dementias. Further studies are needed to clarify associations between Treg and subsequent dementia and cognitive decline.
  51 in total

1.  Correcting for noncompliance and dependent censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with inverse probability of censoring weighted (IPCW) log-rank tests.

Authors:  J M Robins; D M Finkelstein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Determinants of vascular dementia in the Cardiovascular Health Cognition Study.

Authors:  L H Kuller; O L Lopez; W J Jagust; J T Becker; S T DeKosky; C Lyketsos; C Kawas; J C S Breitner; A Fitzpatrick; C Dulberg
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale.

Authors:  L P Fried; N O Borhani; P Enright; C D Furberg; J M Gardin; R A Kronmal; L H Kuller; T A Manolio; M B Mittelmark; A Newman
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Decline in health for older adults: five-year change in 13 key measures of standardized health.

Authors:  Paula H Diehr; Stephen M Thielke; Anne B Newman; Calvin Hirsch; Russell Tracy
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Risk factors for 5-year mortality in older adults: the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  L P Fried; R A Kronmal; A B Newman; D E Bild; M B Mittelmark; J F Polak; J A Robbins; J M Gardin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-02-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Immune profiling of Alzheimer patients.

Authors:  Mariavaleria Pellicanò; Anis Larbi; David Goldeck; Giuseppina Colonna-Romano; Silvio Buffa; Matteo Bulati; Graziella Rubino; Francesco Iemolo; Giuseppina Candore; Calogero Caruso; Evelyna Derhovanessian; Graham Pawelec
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.478

7.  Evaluation of dementia in the cardiovascular health cognition study.

Authors:  Oscar L Lopez; Lewis H Kuller; Annette Fitzpatrick; Diane Ives; James T Becker; Norman Beauchamp
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Meta-analysis confirms CR1, CLU, and PICALM as alzheimer disease risk loci and reveals interactions with APOE genotypes.

Authors:  Gyungah Jun; Adam C Naj; Gary W Beecham; Li-San Wang; Jacqueline Buros; Paul J Gallins; Joseph D Buxbaum; Nilufer Ertekin-Taner; M Daniele Fallin; Robert Friedland; Rivka Inzelberg; Patricia Kramer; Ekaterina Rogaeva; Peter St George-Hyslop; Laura B Cantwell; Beth A Dombroski; Andrew J Saykin; Eric M Reiman; David A Bennett; John C Morris; Kathryn L Lunetta; Eden R Martin; Thomas J Montine; Alison M Goate; Deborah Blacker; Debby W Tsuang; Duane Beekly; L Adrienne Cupples; Hakon Hakonarson; Walter Kukull; Tatiana M Foroud; Jonathan Haines; Richard Mayeux; Lindsay A Farrer; Margaret A Pericak-Vance; Gerard D Schellenberg
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2010-08-09

Review 9.  Peripheral inflammatory biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease: a brief review.

Authors:  Jong-Chan Park; Sun-Ho Han; Inhee Mook-Jung
Journal:  BMB Rep       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.