BACKGROUND: The health of older adults declines over time, but there are many ways of measuring health. It is unclear whether all health measures decline at the same rate or whether some aspects of health are less sensitive to aging than others. METHODS: We compared the decline in 13 measures of physical, mental, and functional health from the Cardiovascular Health Study: hospitalization, bed days, cognition, extremity strength, feelings about life as a whole, satisfaction with the purpose of life, self-rated health, depression, digit symbol substitution test, grip strength, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and gait speed. Each measure was standardized against self-rated health. We compared the 5-year change to see which of the 13 measures declined the fastest and the slowest. RESULTS: The 5-year change in standardized health varied from a decline of 12 points (out of 100) for hospitalization to a decline of 17 points for gait speed. In most comparisons, standardized health from hospitalization and bed days declined the least, whereas health measured by activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and gait speed declined the most. These rankings were independent of age, sex, mortality patterns, and the method of standardization. CONCLUSIONS: All of the health variables declined, on average, with advancing age, but at significantly different rates. Standardized measures of mental health, cognition, quality of life, and hospital utilization did not decline as fast as gait speed, activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living. Public health interventions to address problems with gait speed, activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living may help older adults to remain healthier in all dimensions.
BACKGROUND: The health of older adults declines over time, but there are many ways of measuring health. It is unclear whether all health measures decline at the same rate or whether some aspects of health are less sensitive to aging than others. METHODS: We compared the decline in 13 measures of physical, mental, and functional health from the Cardiovascular Health Study: hospitalization, bed days, cognition, extremity strength, feelings about life as a whole, satisfaction with the purpose of life, self-rated health, depression, digit symbol substitution test, grip strength, activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and gait speed. Each measure was standardized against self-rated health. We compared the 5-year change to see which of the 13 measures declined the fastest and the slowest. RESULTS: The 5-year change in standardized health varied from a decline of 12 points (out of 100) for hospitalization to a decline of 17 points for gait speed. In most comparisons, standardized health from hospitalization and bed days declined the least, whereas health measured by activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and gait speed declined the most. These rankings were independent of age, sex, mortality patterns, and the method of standardization. CONCLUSIONS: All of the health variables declined, on average, with advancing age, but at significantly different rates. Standardized measures of mental health, cognition, quality of life, and hospital utilization did not decline as fast as gait speed, activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living. Public health interventions to address problems with gait speed, activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living may help older adults to remain healthier in all dimensions.
Authors: Anatoli I Yashin; Konstantin G Arbeev; Aliaksandr Kulminski; Igor Akushevich; Lucy Akushevich; Svetlana V Ukraintseva Journal: Biogerontology Date: 2007-01-23 Impact factor: 4.277
Authors: Sara J McLaughlin; Cathleen M Connell; Steven G Heeringa; Lydia W Li; J Scott Roberts Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Meredith L Wallace; Daniel J Buysse; Susan Redline; Katie L Stone; Kristine Ensrud; Yue Leng; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Martica H Hall Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Mary N Haan; Anne Lee; Michelle C Odden; Allison E Aiello; Tu My To; John M Neuhaus Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Yajun Liang; Aiqin Song; Shufa Du; Jack M Guralnik; Chengxuan Qiu Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2014-11-19 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Edward H Ip; Shyh-Huei Chen; W Jack Rejeski; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Kathleen M Hayden; Christina E Hugenschmidt; June Pierce; Michael E Miller; Jaime L Speiser; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Denise K Houston; Robert L Newton; Stephen R Rapp; Dalane W Kitzman Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 6.591
Authors: Kristine M Erlandson; Amanda A Allshouse; Catherine M Jankowski; Samantha Mawhinney; Wendy M Kohrt; Thomas B Campbell Journal: AIDS Date: 2014-08-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: C Hou; Z Ping; K Yang; S Chen; X Liu; H Li; M Liu; Y Ma; N Van Halm-Lutterodt; L Tao; Y Luo; X Yang; W Wang; X Li; X Guo Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: João Delgado; Kirsty Bowman; Alessandro Ble; Jane Masoli; Yang Han; William Henley; Scott Welsh; George A Kuchel; Luigi Ferrucci; David Melzer Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873