| Literature DB >> 35524826 |
J S Legerstee1, A Vreeker1, L Keijsers2, M H J Hillegers1, E Dietvorst3, S Koval1, M M Mens4.
Abstract
Adolescent mental health and well-being have been adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. In this preregistered longitudinal study, we evaluated whether adolescents' well-being improved after playing the multiplayer serious game app Grow It! During the first lockdown (May-June 2020), 1282 Dutch adolescents played the Grow It! app (age = 16.67, SD = 3.07, 68% girls). During the second lockdown (December-May 2020 onwards), an independent cohort of 1871 adolescents participated (age = 18.66, SD = 3.70, 81% girls). Adolescents answered online questionnaires regarding affective and cognitive well-being, depressive symptoms, anxiety, and impact of COVID-19 at baseline. Three to six weeks later, the baseline questionnaire was repeated and user experience questions were asked (N = 462 and N = 733 for the first and second cohort). In both cohorts, affective and cognitive well-being increased after playing the Grow It! app (t = - 6.806, p < 0.001; t = - 6.77, p < 0.001; t = - 6.12, p < 0.001; t = - 5.93, p < 0.001; Cohen's d range 0.20-0.32). At the individual level, 41-53% of the adolescents increased in their affective or cognitive well-being. Adolescents with higher risk profiles (i.e., more depressive symptoms, lower atmosphere at home, and more COVID-19 impact) improved more strongly in their well-being. Positive user evaluations and app engagement were unrelated to changes in affective and cognitive well-being. This proof-of-concept study tentatively suggests that Grow It! supported adolescents during the pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: Experience sampling method; Internalizing problems; Prevention; Serious game; e-health
Year: 2022 PMID: 35524826 PMCID: PMC9076805 DOI: 10.1007/s00787-022-01982-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ISSN: 1018-8827 Impact factor: 5.349
Fig. 1Timeline grow it!
Sample characteristics
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||
| Age, years | 16.67 (3.42) | 18.66 (3.70) |
| Sex % girls | 68% | 81% |
| Education levela | 5% p.s. 16% low 24% middle 55% high | 1% p.s. 17% low 32% middle 39% high 10% other |
| Cultural identity | 92% Dutch 7% mixed 1% other | 97% Dutch 2% mixed 1% other |
| Mental health status | ||
| In treatment for psychological problems (%) | 14% (3% waiting list) | 21% (5% waiting list) |
| Mode of contact since COVID-19 with psychologist/psychiatrist (%) | 62% online 33% offline 5% none | 33% online 65% offline 2% none |
p.s. = primary school, low = (preparatory school for) technical and vocational training, middle = (preparatory school for) professional education, high = (preparatory school for) university
Study outcomes
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Follow-up | Baseline | Follow-up | |
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
| Well-being | ||||
| Affective well-being | 4.90 (1.35) | 5.33 (1.29) | 4.28 (1.40) | 4.59 (1.38) |
| Cognitive well-being | 6.46 (2.20) | 7.12 (2.13) | 5.50 (2.20) | 5.95 (2.19) |
| Depressive symptoms | 5.71 (4.33) | 5.12 (4.08) | 7.35 (4.44) | 6.65 (4.16) |
| Anxiety symptoms | 16.24 (4.83) | 16.15 (4.73) | 18.80 (4.48) | 18.20 (4.51) |
| Coping strategies | ||||
| Adaptive coping | 4.24 (1.37) | 4.01 (1.27) | ||
| Maladaptive coping | 3.38 (1.60) | 3.56 (1.53) | ||
| Impact of COVID-19 | ||||
| Difficulties with cancelations | 2.48 (1.06) | 2.58 (1.18) | ||
| Financial problems | 1.30 (0.68) | 1.32 (0.70) | ||
| Optimism about the future | 2.22 (1.00) | 1.84 (0.89) | ||
| Atmosphere at home | 5.26 (1.24) | 4.92 (1.41) | ||
| COVID19 stringency index | 70.24 (2.79) | 78.50 (2.46) | ||
| User evaluation and engagement | ||||
| User evaluation Grow It! | 7.14 (1.45) | 7.17 (1.32) | ||
| Challenges (%) | 25.67 (26.78) | 32.78 (33.39) | ||
| ESM compliance (%) | 14.20 (20.27) | 20.56 (25.79) | ||
Fig. 2Screenshots Grow It! app
Changes in well-being before and after Grow It!
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall changea | Effect size ( | Overall change | Effect size ( | |||||
| Primary outcomesb | ||||||||
| Affective well-being | + 0.42 | − 6.81 | < 0.001* | 0.32 | + 0.32 | − 6.77 | < 0.001* | 0.23 |
| Cognitive well-being | + 0.57 | − 6.12 | < 0.001* | 0.27 | + 0.43 | − 5.93 | < 0.001* | 0.20 |
| Secondary outcomesc | ||||||||
| Depressive symptoms | − 0.35 | − 2.91 | 0.004* | 0.08 | − 0.75 | − 7.34 | < 0.001* | 0.17 |
| Anxiety symptoms | − 0.06 | 0.43 | 0.671 | 0.01 | − 0.63 | − 4.69 | < 0.001* | 0.14 |
*Corrected alpha was 0.004
aOverall change (mean follow-up – mean baseline)
bPreregistered outcomes
cExploratory outcomes; not preregistered
Fig. 3Changes in affective well-being
Fig. 4Changes in cognitive well-being
Moderators of changes in affective and cognitive well-being
| Cohort 1 | Cohort 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changea affective well-being | Change cognitive well-being | Change affective well-being | Change cognitive well-being | |
| Demographics | ||||
| Sex | 0.64 | 0.27 | 5.18 | 2.65 |
| Education | 0.64 | 7.27* | 0.10 | 0.51 |
| Age | 0.81 | 1.47 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
| Ethnicity | 3.59 | 3.15 | 0.86 | 0.12 |
| Mental health | ||||
| In treatment of psychological problems | 4.97 | 0.50 | 0.86 | 1.72 |
| Well-being | ||||
| Depressive symptoms | 22.46* | 9.14* | 8.09* | 7.25* |
| Anxiety symptoms | 20.48* | 12.49* | 5.35 | 1.16 |
| Coping strategies | ||||
| Adaptive coping | 2.43 | 5.84 | 0.43 | 0.96 |
| Maladaptive coping | 4.73 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.04 |
| Impact of COVID-19 | ||||
| Difficulties with cancelations | 1.53 | 1.00 | 6.59* | 10.58* |
| Financial problem | 8.82* | 0.05 | 1.70 | 2.25 |
| Optimism about future | 8.12* | 15.32* | 1.25 | 1.58 |
| Atmosphere at home | 29.03* | 10.19* | 3.35 | 4.11 |
| COVID-19 stringency index | 16.72* | 9.06 * | 1.50 | 1.48 |
| User evaluation and engagement | ||||
| User evaluation Grow It! | 0.64 | 0.55 | 1.47 | 0.89 |
| Challenges | 0.97 | 1.41 | 0.42 | 0.48 |
| ESM compliance | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.73 | 1.26 |
*Corrected alpha was 0.01
aResults are derived from repeated measures ANOVA with baseline and follow-up measure of well-being as repeated measures and time × moderator als cross-level interaction term. Test statistics displayed are F-statistics, with p values
Fig. 5Illustration of difference in well-being from baseline to follow-up separated for adolescents with depressive symptoms below and above mean (cohort 1)