Zhou Yang1, Ishani Ganguli2, Caitlin Davis3, Mingliang Dai4, Jill Shuemaker5, Lars Peterson4, Andrew Bazemore5, Robert Phillips5, Yoon Kyung Chung6. 1. Clinical Research, Omada Health, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Residency Program, Inova Fairfax Family Medicine, Residency Program, Fairfax, Virginia, USA. 4. Research Team, American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA. 5. Executive Team, The Center for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 6. Research, The Robert Graham Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare physician-level versus practice-level primary care continuity and their association with expenditure and acute care utilization among Medicare beneficiaries and evaluate whether continuity of outpatient primary care at either/both physician or/and practice level could be useful quality measures. DATA SOURCE: Medicare Fee-For-Service claims data for community dwelling beneficiaries without end-stage renal disease who were attributed to a national random sample of primary care practices billing Medicare (2011-2017). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective secondary data analysis at per Medicare beneficiary per year level. We used multivariable linear regression with practice-level fixed effects to estimate continuity of care score at physician versus practice level and their associations with outcomes. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHOD: We calculated clinician- and practice-level Bice-Boxerman continuity of care index scores, ranging from 0 to 1, using primary care outpatient claims. Medicare expenditures, hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions were obtained from the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File: Cost and Utilization Segment. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were defined using diagnosis codes on inpatient claims. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We studied 2,359,400 beneficiaries who sought care from 13,926 physicians. Every 0.1 increase in physician continuity score was associated with a $151 reduction in expenditure per beneficiary per year (p < 0.01), and every 0.1 increase in practice continuity score was associated with $282 decrease (p < 0.01) per beneficiary per year. Both physician- and practice-level continuity were associated with lower Medicare expenditures among small, medium, and large practices. Both physician- and practice-level continuity were associated with lower probabilities of hospitalization, ED visit, admissions for ACSC, and readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care continuity of care could serve as a potent value-based care quality metric. Physician-level continuity is a unique value center that cannot be supplanted by practice-level continuity.
OBJECTIVE: To compare physician-level versus practice-level primary care continuity and their association with expenditure and acute care utilization among Medicare beneficiaries and evaluate whether continuity of outpatient primary care at either/both physician or/and practice level could be useful quality measures. DATA SOURCE: Medicare Fee-For-Service claims data for community dwelling beneficiaries without end-stage renal disease who were attributed to a national random sample of primary care practices billing Medicare (2011-2017). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective secondary data analysis at per Medicare beneficiary per year level. We used multivariable linear regression with practice-level fixed effects to estimate continuity of care score at physician versus practice level and their associations with outcomes. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHOD: We calculated clinician- and practice-level Bice-Boxerman continuity of care index scores, ranging from 0 to 1, using primary care outpatient claims. Medicare expenditures, hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmissions were obtained from the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File: Cost and Utilization Segment. Ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC) were defined using diagnosis codes on inpatient claims. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We studied 2,359,400 beneficiaries who sought care from 13,926 physicians. Every 0.1 increase in physician continuity score was associated with a $151 reduction in expenditure per beneficiary per year (p < 0.01), and every 0.1 increase in practice continuity score was associated with $282 decrease (p < 0.01) per beneficiary per year. Both physician- and practice-level continuity were associated with lower Medicare expenditures among small, medium, and large practices. Both physician- and practice-level continuity were associated with lower probabilities of hospitalization, ED visit, admissions for ACSC, and readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care continuity of care could serve as a potent value-based care quality metric. Physician-level continuity is a unique value center that cannot be supplanted by practice-level continuity.
Authors: Winston R Liaw; Anuradha Jetty; Stephen M Petterson; Lars E Peterson; Andrew W Bazemore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Emily Gard Marshall; Barry Clarke; Frederick Burge; Nirupa Varatharasan; Greg Archibald; Melissa K Andrew Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2016 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: John C Knight; Jeffrey J Dowden; Graham J Worrall; Veerabhadra G Gadag; Madonna M Murphy Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Carrie Colla; Wendy Yang; Alexander J Mainor; Ellen Meara; Marietou H Ouayogode; Valerie A Lewis; Stephen Shortell; Elliott Fisher Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Maneesh Shrivastav; William Gibson; Rajendra Shrivastav; Katie Elzea; Cyrus Khambatta; Rohan Sonawane; Joseph A Sierra; Robert Vigersky Journal: Diabetes Spectr Date: 2018-08