| Literature DB >> 35521555 |
Mohamed Abdallah Mohamed Moustafa1,2, Wessam Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed1,3, Alice C C Lau4, Elisha Chatanga1,5, Yongjin Qiu6, Naoki Hayashi1, Doaa Naguib1,7, Kozue Sato8, Ai Takano9, Keita Matsuno10,11,12, Nariaki Nonaka1, DeMar Taylor13, Hiroki Kawabata14, Ryo Nakao1.
Abstract
Research on vector-associated microbiomes has been expanding due to increasing emergence of vector-borne pathogens and awareness of the importance of symbionts in the vector physiology. However, little is known about microbiomes of argasid (or soft-bodied) ticks due to limited access to specimens. We collected four argasid species (Argas japonicus, Carios vespertilionis, Ornithodoros capensis, and Ornithodoros sawaii) from the nests or burrows of their vertebrate hosts. One laboratory-reared argasid species (Ornithodoros moubata) was also included. Attempts were then made to isolate and characterize potential symbionts/pathogens using arthropod cell lines. Microbial community structure was distinct for each tick species. Coxiella was detected as the predominant symbiont in four tick species where dual symbiosis between Coxiella and Rickettsia or Coxiella and Francisella was observed in C. vespertilionis and O. moubata, respectively. Of note, A. japonicus lacked Coxiella and instead had Occidentia massiliensis and Thiotrichales as alternative symbionts. Our study found strong correlation between tick species and life stage. We successfully isolated Oc. massiliensis and characterized potential pathogens of genera Ehrlichia and Borrelia. The results suggest that there is no consistent trend of microbiomes in relation to tick life stage that fit all tick species and that the final interpretation should be related to the balance between environmental bacterial exposure and endosymbiont ecology. Nevertheless, our findings provide insights on the ecology of tick microbiomes and basis for future investigations on the capacity of argasid ticks to carry novel pathogens with public health importance.Entities:
Keywords: Argasid ticks; Dual symbiosis; Infection; Pathogens; Vector-borne diseases
Year: 2022 PMID: 35521555 PMCID: PMC9062450 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.04.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Struct Biotechnol J ISSN: 2001-0370 Impact factor: 6.155
Primers used in this study.
| Organism | Target gene | Sequence 5′→ 3′ | Primer name | Expected size (bp) | Annealing (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteria | 16S rRNA | TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG | Illumina_16S_341F | 460 | 55 |
| GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC | Illumina_16S_805R | ||||
| AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG | fD1 | 1,600 | 55 | ||
| ACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACTT | rP2 | ||||
| CAGGATTTATGTCTACTGCTGCTTG | EHRCS-131F (1st) | 473 | 50 | ||
| CCAGTATATAAYTGACGWGGACG | EHRCS-1226R (1st) | ||||
| ATGCTGATCATGARCAAAATG | EHRCS-754F (2nd) | 50 | |||
| CCAGTATATAAYTGACGWGGACG | EHRCS-1226R (2nd) | ||||
| TGGCAAATGTAGTTGTAACAGG | groEL_fwd3 | 1,100 | 50 | ||
| GCCGACTTTTAGTACAGCAA | groeEL_rev2 | ||||
| GATCARGCWCAAYATAACCAWATGCA | BflaPAD (1st) | 345 by 1st, applox. 300 by 2nd | 55 | ||
| AGATTCAAGTCTGTTTTGGAAAGC | BflaPDU (1st) | ||||
| GCTGAAGAGCTTGGAATGCAACC | BflaPBU (2nd) | 50 | |||
| TGATCAGTTATCATTCTAATAGCA | BflaPCR (2nd) | ||||
| 16S rRNA | GGTACCYACAGAAGAAGTCC | EHR16SD | 1,395 | 55 | |
| ACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT | 1513R |
Summary of the number of reads for each argasid tick species.
| Species | Total reads | Total features | Minimum reads per sample | Maximum reads per sample | Mean reads per sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,636,358 | 237 | 27,342 | 61,825 | 43,062 | |
| 478,921 | 124 | 9,442 | 47,206 | 34,208 | |
| 1,635,302 | 3,384 | 17,878 | 49,670 | 33,373 | |
| 571,346 | 802 | 4,260 | 38,784 | 27,206 | |
| 214,981 | 43 | 7,760 | 21,924 | 14,332 |
Fig. 5Molecular characterization of endosymbionts and pathogens in argasid ticks. The figure shows maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses based on: (a) nearly full 16S rRNA gene sequence of Occidentia species, (b) nearly full 16S rRNA gene sequence of uncultured bacterium belonging to the order Thiotrichales, (c) partial gltA gene sequences of Ehrlichia species, (d) partial groEL gene sequences of Ehrlichia species, (e) partial flaB gene sequences of Borrelia species, and (f) nearly full 16S rRNA gene sequence of Wolbachia species. The branches were supported by 1,000 bootstrap replications.
Fig. 1Diversity analyses of microbial populations from 136 argasid tick samples. Each dot shows the microbial population from an individual argasid tick and color represents sample species. Color represents sample species (A. japonicus “AJ”, C. vespertilionis “AV”, O. capensis “OC”, O. sawaii “OS”, and O. moubata “OM”), sex (Female “F” and Male “M” or stage (Nymph “N”). a) Alpha diversity analyses according to species variation. Argasid tick species predicted significant variations in the four-alpha diversity metrices (GLM: p < 0.001). b) Beta diversity analyses among argasid ticks. c) Faith's phylogenetic diversity analysis according to sex and stage variations. d) PCoA plots based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity between individual argasid samples according to sex and stage variation. Same Letters above the bars indicate statistically significant difference (GLM: p < 0.01).
Prevalence of bacterial taxa that include potential pathogens in the examined argasid ticks.
| Bacteria | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 4 (8.2%) | 1 (5.0%) | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 3 (6.1%) | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 (2.0%) | 0 | 0 | |
| 0 | 1 (7.1%) | 9 (18.4%) | 1 (5.0%) | 0 |
Summary of the most abundant bacterial families in the microbiome of five argasid species.
| Tick species | Bacterial family | Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 52.03 | ||
| 33.37 | ||
| 8.05 | ||
| 2.39 | ||
| 62.51 | ||
| 21.21 | ||
| 8.37 | ||
| 3.88 | ||
| Thermomicrobiales, JG30-KF-CM45 | 25.47 | |
| 13.75 | ||
| 10.31 | ||
| 6.47 | ||
| 26.32 | ||
| 20.16 | ||
| 9.25 | ||
| 6.19 | ||
| 64.87 | ||
| 34.35 | ||
| 0.29 | ||
| 0.18 |
These bacterial families are the potential endosymbionts within each argasid species.
Fig. 2Relative abundance (%) of bacterial taxa identified in the microbiome of five species of argasid ticks. The figure displays the most abundant 30 taxa individually with the remaining grouped together. Each bar represents the bacterial taxa detected in one sample.
Summary of the potential endosymbionts and their relative abundances in the microbiome of five argasid species.
| Tick species | Potential endosymbiont | Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Thiotrichales | 53.0 | |
| 27.2 | ||
| 64.0 | ||
| 21.4 | ||
| 2.6 | ||
| 7.2 | ||
| 64.2 | ||
| 34.9 |
Fig. 3Relative abundance (%) of the potential pathogenic or endosymbiotic bacterial taxa identified in the microbiome of five species of argasid ticks. Sample-ID labels show the argasid tick species (A. japonicus “AJ”, C. vespertilionis “CV”, O. capensis “OC”, O. sawaii “OS”, and O. moubata “OM”) and sample numbers. On the right side of the figure, LEfSe results showing the most differentially abundant taxa (p < 0.05) within each argasid species according to sex and stage variations.
Fig. 4A Gimenez stained cytocentrifuged smear of I. scapularis cell line ISE6 infected with Oc. massiliensis isolated from A. japonicus.