| Literature DB >> 35520586 |
Nataša Dimitrić1, Nemanja Spremo1, Milan Vraneš1, Sanja Belić1, Maja Karaman1, Strahinja Kovačević2, Milica Karadžić2, Sanja Podunavac-Kuzmanović2, Daniela Korolija-Crkvenjakov3, Slobodan Gadžurić1.
Abstract
In this work, new protic ionic liquids (PILs) with 1-ammonium-2-propanol cation and nine different anions: formate (For), acetate (Ac), lactate (Lac), trifluoroacetate (TFA), chloroacetate (ClA), trichloroacetate (TClA), 3-chloropropionate (3-ClP), 4-chlorobutyrate (4-ClB) and mandelate (Man) were prepared in order to study their antimicrobial activity and possible application for fungi and bacteria removal from deteriorated paper heritage. Ten filamentous fungal strains isolated from specific pigmented area of the damaged books: Trichoderma sp., Cladosporium sp., Penicillium sp.(1-3), Penicillium citrinum, Aspergillus sp.(1,2), Aspergillus flavus, Fusarium graminearum, eight Gram positive and Gram negative ATCC bacterial strains: B. subtilis (6633), S. aureus (6538), E. faecalis (19433), K. rhizophila (9341), E. coli (11229), S. enteritidis (13076), P. mirabilis (12453), P. aeruginosa (15692) and two yeast Candida strains: Candida albicans (ATCC 10231) and Candida albicans (L) were used in this study. The results indicated that antimicrobial activity of selected ionic liquids is significantly affected by the size and specific functional groups in the anion structure. These facts opened the possibility for molecular design of new ionic liquids with strong inhibition properties against the specific bacterial, mould and yeast strains. The significant antimicrobial properties observed in this research suggest that studied PILs may have potential applications in the paper art and artefact cleaning and conservation replacing thus, conventional solvents and organic substances that are toxic for humans and environment. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35520586 PMCID: PMC9064666 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra03067k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1The synthetic path for investigated protic ionic liquids.
TG analysis of prepared PILs
| Name | ( |
|---|---|
| For | 144.0 |
| Ac | 117.0 |
| Lac | 67.3 |
| TFA | 189.5 |
| ClA | 177.8 |
| TClA | 114.7 |
| 3-ClP | 86.2 |
| 4-ClB | 58.7 |
| Man | 117.0 |
Antifungal activity of newly synthesised PILs using the microdilution methoda
| Ionic liquids | 1-Amino-2-propanol | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formic acid | Acetic acid | Latic acid | Trifluoroacetic acid | Chloroacetic acid | Trichloroacetic acid | 3-Chloropropanoic acid | 4-Chlorobutyric acid | Mandelic acid | ||||||||||
| Fungi strains | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC |
| ↓ | Concentration (mg ml−1) | |||||||||||||||||
|
| 37.29 | 37.29 | 74.69 | 74.69 | 18.57 | 18.57 | 74.38 | 74.38 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 74.30 | — | 2.36 | 2.36 | 4.82 | 4.82 | 74.31 | — |
|
| 4.66 | 4.66 | 37.35 | 74.69 | ↑9.29 | 18.57 | 37.19 | 37.19 | 0.58 | 1.15 | 37.15 | 37.15 | 1.18 | 2.36 | 2.41 | 2.41 | 37.16 | 37.16 |
|
| 4.66 | 4.66 | 37.35 | 74.69 | 18.57 | 18.57 | 37.19 | 74.38 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 37.15 | 74.30 | 0.59 | 1.18 | 2.41 | 4.82 | 74.31 | — |
|
| 4.66 | 4.66 | 37.35 | 74.69 | 18.57 | 18.57 | 37.19 | 74.38 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 37.15 | 37.15 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 2.41 | 4.82 | 74.31 | — |
|
| 4.66 | 4.66 | 74.69 | 74.69 | 37.15 | 37.15 | 37.19 | 74.38 | ↑0.58 | 1.15 | 37.15 | 74.30 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 2.41 | 4.82 | 74.31 | 74.31 |
|
| 4.67 | 4.67 | 37.13 | 37.13 | 9.39 | 9.39 | 18.67 | 37.34 | ↑0.59 | 1.17 | 9.28 | 9.28 | 1.16 | 1.16 | ↑2.33 | 4.67 | 37.94 | 37.94 |
|
| 2.33 | 2.33 | 18.67 | 74.69 | 9.29 | 9.29 | 18.59 | 37.19 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 9.29 | 9.29 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 2.41 | 4.82 | 37.16 | 37.16 |
|
| 4.66 | 4.66 | 18.67 | 18.67 | 9.29 | 9.29 | 37.19 | 37.19 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 4.64 | 4.64 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 4.82 | 4.82 | 18.58 | 18.58 |
|
| 18.67 | 18.67 | 74.26 | 74.26 | 18.77 | 18.77 | 37.34 | 37.34 | 0.59 | 1.17 | 18.56 | 18.56 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 2.33 | 4.67 | 75.89 | — |
|
| 9.33 | 9.33 | 37.13 | 37.13 | 18.77 | 18.77 | 37.34 | 37.34 | ↑0.59 | 1.17 | 18.56 | 18.56 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 2.33 | 2.33 | ↑37.94 | 75.89 |
↑Inhibition was observed but the value does not correspond to MIC.
Antibacterial activity of newly synthesised PILs using the microdilution methoda
| Ionic liquids | 1-Amino-2-propanol | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formic acid | Acetic acid | Lactic acid | Trifluoroacetric acid | Chloroacetic acid | Trichloroacetic acid | 3-Choropropanoic acid | 4-Chlorobutyric acid | Mandelic acid | |||||||||||
| Bacterial strains | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | |
| ↓ | Concentration (mg ml−1) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gr+ |
| 6.75 | — | 13.53 | 13.53 | ↑13.5 | — | — | — | 1.69 | 1.69 | ↑13.54 | — | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | ↑6.76 | 13.51 | — | — |
|
| 13.50 | 13.50 | ↑13.53 | — | — | — | — | — | ↑0.42 | 1.69 | — | — | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | ↑6.76 | 13.51 | ↑6.76 | 13.53 | |
|
| ↑1.69 | 3.37 | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | ↑6.75 | 13.50 | ↑1.7 | 3.40 | ↑0.42 | 1.69 | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | |
|
| 6.75 | 6.75 | 6.76 | 6.76 | 6.75 | 6.75 | 13.58 | 13.58 | 0.84 | 3.38 | 13.54 | — | 0.42 | 0.84 | 6.76 | 13.51 | ↑13.53 | — | |
| Gr− |
| 13.50 | 13.50 | ↑6.76 | 13.53 | ↑13.5 | — | — | — | ↑0.84 | 3.38 | ↑13.54 | — | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | ↑6.76 | 13.51 | ↑13.53 | — |
|
| ↑6.75 | 13.50 | ↑6.76 | 13.53 | 13.50 | 13.50 | — | — | 3.38 | 3.38 | ↑13.54 | — | 3.38 | 6.77 | 6.76 | 6.76 | — | — | |
|
| ↑6.75 | 13.50 | 13.53 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.69 | 1.69 | — | — | ↑1.69 | 3.88 | 6.76 | 6.76 | — | — | |
|
| ↑3.37 | 6.75 | 13.53 | 13.53 | ↑13.5 | — | — | — | ↑0.84 | ↑0.84 | ↑13.54 | — | ↑0.84 | 1.69 | 6.76 | 6.76 | ↑13.53 | — | |
↑Inhibition was observed but the value does not correspond to MIC.
Antifungal activity of newly synthesised PILs using the microdilution methoda
| Ionic liquids | 1-Amino-2-propanol | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formic acid | Acetic acid | Lactic acid | Trifluoroacetric acid | Chloroacetic acid | Trichloroacetic acid | 3-Choropropanoic acid | 4-Chlorobutyric acid | Mandelic acid | ||||||||||
|
| MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC |
| ↓ | Concentration (mg ml−1) | |||||||||||||||||
|
| 13.50 | 13.50 | 13.53 | 13.53 | ↑3.38 | 6.75 | — | — | ↑1.69 | 3.38 | ↑13.54 | — | 1.69 | 3.38 | 13.51 | 13.51 | — | — |
|
| 3.37 | 6.75 | 6.76 | 6.76 | 6.75 | 6.75 | 13.58 | — | 0.85 | 0.85 | 13.54 | 13.54 | 3.38 | 3.38 | 6.76 | 6.76 | — | — |
↑Inhibition was observed but the value does not correspond to MIC.
Fig. 2Antifungal activity of protic ionic liquid 1-ammonium-2-propanol chloroacetate (ClA) on F. graminearum (A) and C. albicans ATCC (B).
Fig. 3Procedure of book cover cleaning.
Fig. 4Sample of paper artefact before and after treatment with selected PILs.
Fig. 5The HCA dendrogram of the studied PILs based on MIC values.
Fig. 6The graphical representation of the results of the SRD analysis of the analyzed PILs based on minimum row values (A) and average row values of MIC (B); the statistical characteristics of the theoretical distribution functions are: first icosaile (5%), XX1 = 32; first quartile, Q1 = 42; median, Med = 48; last quartile, Q3 = 54; last icosaile (95%), XX19 = 62.