Literature DB >> 35519838

Combining medical, physiotherapy and nursing undergraduates in high-fidelity simulation: determining students' perceptions.

Josephine Seale1, Sabina Ikram1, Lewis Whittingham1, Colin Butchers1.   

Abstract

High-fidelity simulation (Hi-Fi SIM) is increasingly used to provide undergraduate interprofessional education (IPE). Although research has reported positive student feedback, studies have predominantly involved medical and nursing specialties. The present study sought to further explore this area by determining the perceptions of medical, physiotherapy and nursing students participating in the same simulation session. A total of 145 medical, physiotherapy and nursing undergraduate students jointly participated in a novel Hi-Fi SIM IPE programme. Immediately before and after their session, students completed the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire where statements were rated regarding simulation, IPE and human factors. A high score indicated a more positive attitude. Physiotherapy students reported the lowest level of previous Hi-Fi SIM experience. Students from each specialty had more positive attitudes related to simulation, IPE and human factors following their simulation. Physiotherapy students had predominantly less positive attitudes compared with nursing and medical students. Participation in an IPE Hi-Fi SIM session positively impacted on the perceptions of medical, physiotherapy and nursing students regarding the relevance of simulation, IPE and the importance of human factors. Such findings support the use of this learning modality for the provision of IPE in a range of specialties. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high-fidelity simulation; medicine; nursing; physiotherapy; undergraduate

Year:  2018        PMID: 35519838      PMCID: PMC8936973          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  13 in total

1.  Key elements for interprofessional education. Part 1: the learner, the educator and the learning context.

Authors:  Ivy Oandasan; Scott Reeves
Journal:  J Interprof Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.338

2.  High-fidelity patient simulation in physiotherapy education.

Authors:  Felicity C Blackstock; Gwendolen A Jull
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Interprofessional Team Training at the Prelicensure Level: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Sioban Nelson; Catriona F White; Brian D Hodges; Maria Tassone
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Undergraduate students' perceptions of and attitudes toward a simulation-based interprofessional curriculum: the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire.

Authors:  Elaine Sigalet; Tyrone Donnon; Vincent Grant
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.929

5.  Use of high fidelity human simulation to teach physical therapist decision-making skills for the intensive care setting.

Authors:  Michael J Shoemaker; Lena Riemersma; Ron Perkins
Journal:  Cardiopulm Phys Ther J       Date:  2009-03

Review 6.  Defining and assessing professional competence.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein; Edward M Hundert
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Simulation experience enhances physical therapist student confidence in managing a patient in the critical care environment.

Authors:  Patricia J Ohtake; Marcilene Lazarus; Rebecca Schillo; Michael Rosen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-01-17

8.  The effect of high-fidelity simulation training on medical-surgical graduate nurses' perceived ability to respond to patient clinical emergencies.

Authors:  Christopher James Gordon; Tom Buckley
Journal:  J Contin Educ Nurs       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.224

9.  The positive impact of interprofessional education: a controlled trial to evaluate a programme for health professional students.

Authors:  Ben Darlow; Karen Coleman; Eileen McKinlay; Sarah Donovan; Louise Beckingsale; Ben Gray; Hazel Neser; Meredith Perry; James Stanley; Sue Pullon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  'The Diamond': a structure for simulation debrief.

Authors:  Peter Jaye; Libby Thomas; Gabriel Reedy
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2015-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.