| Literature DB >> 35519365 |
Jie Zuo1, Xingyuan Zhang1, Xinyu Li1, Zhiwei Li1, Zongren Li1, Honghong Li2, Wencheng Zhang2.
Abstract
Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) prepared using conventional functional monomers exhibit poor specific extraction of scopolamine from tropane alkaloids, which hinders their application in separation and purification. In this paper, a novel molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) was prepared by precipitation polymerization using scopolamine as the template, monoethyl fumarate (MFMA) as a functional monomer, and ethylene dimethacrylate (EGDMA) as a cross-linker. The advantages of the supercritical fluid technology for the removal of the template were verified by comparing the efficiency of the swelling method and the Soxhlet extraction method. The prepared MFMA-based MIPs (MFMA-MIPs) showed a high adsorption capacity (49.75 mg g-1) and high selectivity toward scopolamine with a selectivity coefficient of 3.5. 1H NMR spectroscopy was performed to demonstrate the interactions between the two functional groups of the functional monomer and the template. Lastly, MFMA-MIPs were used as solid phase extraction (SPE) sorbents for scopolamine analysis. It was found that 97.0-107.0% of the template had been extracted using the SPE column from the complex of scopolamine, atropine and anisodamine. The mean recoveries of scopolamine from plant samples were 96.0-106.0% using the established method, which showed a good linearity in the range of 8.0-4.0 × 104 μg L-1. The results showed that MFMA-MIPs could be applied for the separation of scopolamine from tropane alkaloids. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35519365 PMCID: PMC9065296 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra03542g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of MFMA-MIP and the mechanism for its selective removal of scopolamine.
Fig. 2UV absorption spectrum of the removal of scopolamine with the elution time. (a) Soxhlet extraction; (b) the swelling method using scCO2.
Fig. 3FT-IR spectra of MFMA-MIP and MFMA-NIP.
Fig. 4SEM images of the polymers: (a) MFMA-NIP; and (b) MFMA-MIP.
Fig. 5Langmuir isotherm and Freundlich isotherm of MFMA-MIP and MFMA-NIP.
Isotherm parameters for scopolamine binding by MFMA-MIP and MFMA-NIP from the two isotherm models
|
| Sorbent | Langmuir isotherm | Freundlich isotherm | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1/ | ||
| 298 | MFMA-MIP | 0.9814 | 49.75 | 0.0145 | 0.9055 | 3.4134 | 0.4539 |
| MFMA-NIP | 0.9673 | 16.57 | 0.0131 | 0.8834 | 0.9730 | 0.4779 | |
Fig. 6Distribution coefficient of MFMA-MIP and MFMA-NIP towards different substrates.
α and β of MFMA-MIP and AA-co-EAA-MIP towards different substrates
| Substrate | MFMA-MIP | AA- | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Scopolamine | 3.5 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 |
| Atropine | 1.3 | 2.7 | 2.4 | 1.3 |
| Anisodamine | 1.2 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 |
Fig. 71H NMR spectra of scopolamine, scopolamine + MFMA and MFMA in DMSO: (a) scopolamine; (b) scopolamine + MFMA; and (c) MFMA.
Fig. 8Chromatograms obtained for the mixture of scopolamine (peak 2), anisodamine (peak 1) and atropine (peak 3).
Determination of scopolamine in spiked plant samples using the MFMA-MISPE method
| Samples | Amount added (mg L−1) | Detected (mg L−1) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hindu | — | ND | — | — |
| 0.050 | 0.051 | 102 | 3.4 | |
| 0.100 | 0.096 | 96 | 2.7 | |
| Belladonna | — | ND | — | — |
| 0.050 | 0.053 | 106 | 4.1 | |
| 0.100 | 0.099 | 99 | 3.5 | |
|
| — | 0.011 | — | — |
| 0.050 | 0.060 | 98 | 2.9 | |
| 0.100 | 0.107 | 96 | 4.0 |
ND is not detected.