Literature DB >> 35519014

Effect of In Situ High-Fidelity Simulation Training on the Emergency management of Pneumonia (INSTEP): a mixed-methods study.

Owain Michael Leng1, Charlotte Rothwell2, Annamarie Buckton3, Catherine Elmer3, Jan Illing2, Jane Metcalf3.   

Abstract

Background: The patient safety agenda has propelled the rise of simulation education, but relatively few evaluations of simulation-based educational interventions have focused on patient outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the impact of an in situ, high-fidelity simulation teaching intervention on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in the ambulatory care unit of a district general hospital.
Methods: This study used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the impact of a programme of 10 in situ high-fidelity simulation education sessions delivered to a total of 10 junior doctors, nine nurses and seven healthcare assistants. Participants were tasked with managing a manikin simulating a patient with pneumonia in real time in a working clinical area. Subsequent structured debrief emphasised key themes from the national guidelines on pneumonia management. The intervention was evaluated through an immediate feedback form, follow-up semistructured interviews by independent qualitative researchers that underwent content analysis and triangulation with audit data on compliance with national pneumonia guidelines before and after the simulation intervention.
Results: The in situ simulation intervention was valued by participants both in immediate written feedback and in follow-up semistructured interviews. In these interviews, 17 of 18 participants were able to identify a self-reported change in practice following the simulation intervention. Furthermore, most participants reported observing a change in the clinical practice of their colleagues following the training. Collected audit data did not show a statistically significant change in compliance with the guidelines for the management of pneumonia.
Conclusion: This study found evidence of a change in both self-reported and observed clinical practice following a simulation intervention, supporting expert opinion that simulation education can impact clinician behaviours and patient outcomes in complex clinical scenarios. Furthermore, this feasibility study provides a transferrable method to evaluate the real-world impact of simulation education that merits further investigation through an appropriately powered study. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high fidelity; medical education; pneumonia; sepsis; simulation

Year:  2018        PMID: 35519014      PMCID: PMC8990208          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  24 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  E Rivers; B Nguyen; S Havstad; J Ressler; A Muzzin; B Knoblich; E Peterson; M Tomlanovich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 4.  The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning.

Authors:  Ruth M Fanning; David M Gaba
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.929

5.  There's no such thing as "nonjudgmental" debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment.

Authors:  Jenny W Rudolph; Robert Simon; Ronald L Dufresne; Daniel B Raemer
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.929

6.  Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback.

Authors:  Georges L Savoldelli; Viren N Naik; Jason Park; Hwan S Joo; Roger Chow; Stanley J Hamstra
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training.

Authors:  Timothy J Draycott; Joanna F Crofts; Jonathan P Ash; Louise V Wilson; Elaine Yard; Thabani Sibanda; Andrew Whitelaw
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Laparoscopic surgical skills are significantly improved by the use of a portable laparoscopic simulator: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T J Johnston; B Tang; A Alijani; I Tait; R J Steele; J Ker; G Nabi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  'The Diamond': a structure for simulation debrief.

Authors:  Peter Jaye; Libby Thomas; Gabriel Reedy
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2015-06

10.  Predictive validity evidence for medical education research study quality instrument scores: quality of submissions to JGIM's Medical Education Special Issue.

Authors:  Darcy A Reed; Thomas J Beckman; Scott M Wright; Rachel B Levine; David E Kern; David A Cook
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.