Literature DB >> 35518561

Simulation capacity building in rural Indian hospitals: a 1-year follow-up qualitative analysis.

Veena Sheshadri1, Isaac Wasserman2,3, Nandakumar Menon1, Alexander W Peters3,4, Vatshalan Santhirapala3,5, Shivani Mitra6, Simone Sandler3, Emma Svensson3,7, David Ljungman3,8, Regi George9, Arundhathi Ambepu9, Jithendranath Krishnan1, Raman Kataria10, Salim Afshar3,6,11, John G Meara3,6,11, Jerome T Galea12, Peter Weinstock11,13, Christopher Roussin11,14,15, Matthew Taylor13, Craig D McClain3,11,16.   

Abstract

Introduction: The benefits of simulation-based medical training are well described. The most effective way to plant and scale simulation training in rural locations remains undescribed. We sought to plant simulation training programmes for anaesthesia emergencies in two rural Indian hospitals.
Methods: Two Indian consultant anaesthetists without experience in medical simulation underwent a 3-day course at the Boston Children's Hospital's (BCH) Simulator Program. They returned to their institutions and launched simulation programmes with an airway manikin and mock patient monitor. The 1-year experience was evaluated using individual, in-depth interviews of simulation facilitators. Three staff members (responsible for facilitating medical simulations over the prior year) at two rural hospitals in India were interviewed. None attended the BCH training; instead, they received on-the-job training from the BCH-trained, consultant anaesthetist colleagues.
Results: Successes included organisational adoption of simulation training with exercises 1 year after the initial BCH-training, increased interdisciplinary teamwork and improved clinical competency in managing emergencies. Barriers to effective, local implementation of simulation programmes fell into three categories: time required to run simulations, fixed and rigid roles, and variable resources. Thematic improvement requests were for standardised resources to help train simulation facilitators and demonstrate to participants a well-run simulation, in addition to context-sensitive scenarios.
Conclusion: An in-person training of simulation facilitators to promote medical simulation programmes in rural hospitals produced ongoing simulation programmes 1 year later. In order to make these programmes sustainable, however, increased investment in developing simulation facilitators is required. In particular, simulation facilitators must be prepared to formally train other simulation facilitators, too. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute Care; Anesthesia; Assessment Of Crisis Management Skills; Assessment/Credentialling; Simulation-Based Training

Year:  2020        PMID: 35518561      PMCID: PMC8936633          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  18 in total

1.  The Importance of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning: Comparison Between Debriefing and No Debriefing.

Authors:  Eon Na Ryoo; Eun-Ho Ha
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Association of the Number of a Simulation Faculty With the Implementation of Simulation-Based Education.

Authors:  Jin Takahashi; Takashi Shiga; Hiraku Funakoshi; Yosuke Homma; Michiko Mizobe; Yuichiro Ishigami; Hideki Honda
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.929

3.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of empathy education for undergraduate nursing students.

Authors:  Tracy Levett-Jones; Robyn Cant; Samuel Lapkin
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Low-Cost Simulation to Teach Anesthetists' Non-Technical Skills in Rwanda.

Authors:  Teresa Skelton; Isaac Nshimyumuremyi; Christian Mukwesi; Sara Whynot; Lauren Zolpys; Patricia Livingston
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  The Effectiveness of Medical Simulation in Teaching Medical Students Critical Care Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew David Beal; John Kinnear; Caroline Rachael Anderson; Thomas David Martin; Rachel Wamboldt; Lee Hooper
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.929

6.  Successes and Challenges of Interprofessional Physiologic Birth and Obstetric Emergency Simulations in a Nurse-Midwifery Education Program.

Authors:  Jenna Shaw-Battista; Cynthia Belew; Deborah Anderson; Sandrijn van Schaik
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  "A short trauma course for physicians in a resource-limited setting: Is low-cost simulation effective?".

Authors:  K Pringle; J M Mackey; P Modi; H Janeway; T Romero; F Meynard; H Perez; R Herrera; M Bendana; A Labora; J Ruskis; J Foggle; R Partridge; A C Levine
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  SimZones: An Organizational Innovation for Simulation Programs and Centers.

Authors:  Christopher J Roussin; Peter Weinstock
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 9.  To err is human: use of simulation to enhance training and patient safety in anaesthesia.

Authors:  H Higham; B Baxendale
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Barriers and facilitators to the provision of optimal obstetric and neonatal emergency care and to the implementation of simulation-enhanced mentorship in primary care facilities in Bihar, India: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Melissa C Morgan; Jessica Dyer; Aranzazu Abril; Amelia Christmas; Tanmay Mahapatra; Aritra Das; Dilys M Walker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.