Literature DB >> 30969268

Association of the Number of a Simulation Faculty With the Implementation of Simulation-Based Education.

Jin Takahashi1, Takashi Shiga, Hiraku Funakoshi, Yosuke Homma, Michiko Mizobe, Yuichiro Ishigami, Hideki Honda.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although the implementation of simulation-based education (SBE) is essential for emergency medicine residency programs (EMRPs), little is known about the factors associated with its degree of SBE implementation in EMRPs. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate factors associated with SBE implementation in EMRPs. We hypothesized that the number of the simulation faculty was associated with the degree of SBE implementation.
METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional survey on SBE implementation in emergency medicine resident education, in accredited EMRPs in the Greater Tokyo area, Japan. Survey question themes included institutional characteristics and the status of simulation education in them. For analyzing factors associated with SBE implementation, we defined EMRPs with a robust SBE implementation as those having an annual simulation time exceeding 10 hours.
RESULTS: The survey response rate was 73% (115/158). Of the EMRPs that responded, 32% reported that their annual simulation time was more than 10 hours. In the unadjusted analysis, possession of a simulator in the emergency department was significantly associated with nonrobust SBE implementation, but the number of the simulation faculty was significantly associated. On adjusting for possession of a simulator in the emergency department, presence of simulation curriculum, and presence of simulation-based formative or comprehensive assessment, we observed an association of robust SBE implementation with a number of the simulation faculty (unit odds ratio = 1.33; 95% confidence interval = 1.10-1.60).
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first Japanese study to demonstrate that the number of the simulation faculty at a program is independently associated with a robust SBE implementation.

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30969268     DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Simul Healthc        ISSN: 1559-2332            Impact factor:   1.929


  4 in total

1.  Simulation capacity building in rural Indian hospitals: a 1-year follow-up qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Veena Sheshadri; Isaac Wasserman; Nandakumar Menon; Alexander W Peters; Vatshalan Santhirapala; Shivani Mitra; Simone Sandler; Emma Svensson; David Ljungman; Regi George; Arundhathi Ambepu; Jithendranath Krishnan; Raman Kataria; Salim Afshar; John G Meara; Jerome T Galea; Peter Weinstock; Christopher Roussin; Matthew Taylor; Craig D McClain
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-08-13

Review 2.  Simulation as a Tool to Illustrate Clinical Pharmacology Concepts to Healthcare Program Learners.

Authors:  Liza Barbarello Andrews; Les Barta
Journal:  Curr Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  Simulation-based curriculum development: lessons learnt in Global Health education.

Authors:  Rasha D Sawaya; Sandra Mrad; Eva Rajha; Rana Saleh; Julie Rice
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Simulation-based medical education in Thailand: a cross-sectional online national survey.

Authors:  Polpun Boonmak; Suwannee Suraseranivongse; Ngamjit Pattaravit; Suhattaya Boonmak; Tachawan Jirativanont; Tripop Lertbunnaphong; Rajin Arora; Jittiya Watcharotayangul; Intanon Imsuwan; Panithan Kwangwaropas; Borwon Wittayachamnankul
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.263

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.