Literature DB >> 35517912

Evaluation of simulation methods for teaching peripheral arterial examination to medical students.

Syed Ali Naqi1, Abdel Monim Salih1, Anthony Hoban1, Firas Ayoub1, Michael Quirke1, Arnold D K Hill1, Claire Condron1.   

Abstract

Physical examination is a critical component of medical practice yet the focus on efficient patient turnover has impacted the availability of patients with clinical findings willing to be examined by students and skills' teaching is not consistent across clinical rotations. This work evaluates simulation methodologies for teaching of the peripheral arterial examination and evaluates whether skills learnt are transferable to clinical practice. Second-year medical students were taught peripheral arterial examination on a SimMan 3G or with simulated patients (SPs). Both groups were assessed by Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) with outpatients who have been diagnosed with peripheral arterial disease. There was no difference in the pass rate at OSCE between the two groups. SimMan better facilitated repeated practice, group learning, peer teaching and discussion, which were highly valued by the students. Students felt that the SImMan tutorial did not facilitate development of spatial cognition or pattern recognition. They also felt less well prepared to deal with real patients in terms of having practised appropriate language, issuing instructions and attempting to reassure patients. Both methods of simulation teaching have distinct merits and the ideal approach maybe to use the SimMan in combination with SPs. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  high fidelity simulation; peripheral arterial examination; simulated patients

Year:  2018        PMID: 35517912      PMCID: PMC8936850          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  13 in total

Review 1.  Teaching students the art and science of physical diagnosis.

Authors:  R C Anderson; M J Fagan; J Sebastian
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 2.  Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies.

Authors:  M Sandelowski
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.228

3.  Integrated simulation experiences to enhance clinical education.

Authors:  Ruth Greenberg; Gary Loyd; Gina Wesley
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Final year medical students' views on simulation-based teaching: a comparison with the Best Evidence Medical Education Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zoë Paskins; Ed Peile
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  Can simulation replace part of clinical time? Two parallel randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Kathryn Watson; Anthony Wright; Norman Morris; Joan McMeeken; Darren Rivett; Felicity Blackstock; Anne Jones; Terry Haines; Vivienne O'Connor; Geoffrey Watson; Raymond Peterson; Gwendolen Jull
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 6.  Riding the wave: current and emerging trends in graduates from Australian university medical schools.

Authors:  Catherine M Joyce; Johannes U Stoelwinder; John J McNeil; Leon Piterman
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Teaching the physical examination: a longitudinal strategy for tomorrow's physicians.

Authors:  Toshiko Uchida; Jeanne M Farnan; Jennifer E Schwartz; Heather L Heiman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  A Qualitative Analysis of the Transition from Theory to Practice in Undergraduate Training in a PBL-Medical School.

Authors:  Katinka J.A.H. Prince; Margaretha Van De Wiel; Albert J.J.A. Scherpbier; Cess P.M. Can Der Vleuten; Henny P.A. Boshuizen
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.853

9.  Use of breast simulators compared with standardized patients in teaching the clinical breast examination to medical students.

Authors:  Jane R Schubart; Lillian Erdahl; J Stanley Smith; Heather Purichia; Gordon L Kauffman; Rena B Kass
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Twelve tips for excellent physical examination teaching.

Authors:  Subha Ramani
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.