Literature DB >> 35517845

Intrinsic motivation of preclinical medical students participating in high-fidelity mannequin simulation.

Brent Thoma1,2, Emily M Hayden1,3, Nelson Wong1,3, Jason L Sanders4, Greg Malin5, James A Gordon1,3.   

Abstract

Introduction: While medical schools strive to foster students' lifelong learning, motivational theories have not played an explicit role in curricular design. Self-determination Theory is a prominent motivational theory. It posits that perceived autonomy, competence and relatedness foster intrinsic motivation. This study explores the effects of autonomy on intrinsic motivation in medical students participating in high-fidelity mannequin simulation.
Methods: A non-randomised crossover trial compared first-year medical students participating in (1) required simulation sessions with predetermined learning objectives and (2) extracurricular simulation sessions with student-directed learning objectives. An adapted Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) was used to assess intrinsic motivation, perceived autonomy, competence and relatedness. Each participant completed the IMI survey after each type of session. Variables were compared with signed-rank tests.
Results: All 22 participants completed the IMI after both types of session. Perceived autonomy was significantly higher during extracurricular simulation (p<0.001), but intrinsic motivation, competence and relatedness were not. Intrinsic motivation correlated with autonomy (RS=0.57 and extracurricular simulation, ES=0.52), competence (RS=0.46 and ES=0.15) and relatedness (RS=0.51 and ES=0.64). The IMI subscales had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.84, 0.90, 0.90 and 0.76 for intrinsic motivation, autonomy, competence and relatedness, respectively). Conclusions: Extracurricular sessions increased students' perceived autonomy, but they were highly intrinsically motivated in both settings. Further study is needed to understand the relationship between perceived autonomy and intrinsic motivation in medical education learning activities. The IMI shows promise as a measurement tool for this work. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medical simulation; Preclinical medical education; Self-determination theory

Year:  2015        PMID: 35517845      PMCID: PMC8936958          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  18 in total

1.  Learner-centered medical education.

Authors:  Kenneth M Ludmerer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  What kind of motivation drives medical students' learning quests?

Authors:  Dejano T Sobral
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.251

3.  Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement.

Authors:  Don C Des Jarlais; Cynthia Lyles; Nicole Crepaz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Have motivation theories guided the development and reform of medical education curricula? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Rashmi A Kusurkar; Gerda Croiset; Karen V Mann; Eugene Custers; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Medical education in the United States and Canada, 2010.

Authors:  M Brownell Anderson; Steven L Kanter
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: a test of self-determination theory.

Authors:  G C Williams; E L Deci
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1996-04

7.  An international comparison of knowledge levels of medical students: the Maastricht Progress Test.

Authors:  M G Albano; F Cavallo; R Hoogenboom; F Magni; G Majoor; F Manenti; L Schuwirth; I Stiegler; C van der Vleuten
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 8.  What counts as validity evidence? Examples and prevalence in a systematic review of simulation-based assessment.

Authors:  David A Cook; Benjamin Zendejas; Stanley J Hamstra; Rose Hatala; Ryan Brydges
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.853

9.  Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis.

Authors:  E McAuley; T Duncan; V V Tammen
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 10.  How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide No. 59.

Authors:  Th J Ten Cate; Rashmi A Kusurkar; Geoffrey C Williams
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.