| Literature DB >> 35517734 |
Heba Mohamed Fahmy1, Rana Essam Salah Eldin2, Esraa Samy Abu Serea3, Nourhan Mamdouh Gomaa1, Gehad M AboElmagd4, Suzan A Salem5, Ziad A Elsayed6, Aisha Edrees1, Engy Shams-Eldin7, Ahmed Esmail Shalan8,9.
Abstract
A large number of non-biodegradable and non-renewable materials are produced daily for application as food packaging materials. These waste materials have a greatly negative effect on our health and the ecosystem. The idea of a bio-based economy is steadily gaining attention from the scientific, societal, and financial communities, so there are several areas in which the intended approaches can be improved for this reason. Therefore, creating biopolymer-based materials from natural sources, including polysaccharides and proteins, is a good alternative to non-renewable fossil resources. In the current review paper, we plan to summarize the major recent findings in food biodegradable packaging materials that include nanotechnology either directly or indirectly. Several natural nano-materials applied in food packaging applications such as polymers, polysaccharides, and protein-based nano-materials have been included in order to make special biopolymer hosts for nanocomposites. Finally, this review will highlight the antibacterial properties of commonly used nanoparticles or nanomaterials. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35517734 PMCID: PMC9054293 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra02922j
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The schematic diagram summarizes the different approaches of polymer nanocomposites production.
Fig. 2The scanning electron micrographs of the surfaces of (A) PLA and (B–D) the PLA/ZnO bio-composite films with different addition percentage (1, 3, and 5%), respectively. The scale bar for (a) is 100 μm, while it is 50 μm for (b–d). Reproduced with permission from ref. 6. Copyright© 2016 Elsevier.
Fig. 3The figure shows firstly, the incorporation of AgNPs into the PHBV structure, then the evolution of O2 gas during the formation process. After that, it shows the antimicrobial activities of freshly made nanocomposites (0 days) and 210 days aged PHBV3/PHBV18/AgNPs nanocomposites against Salmonella enterica and Listeria monocytogenes after 24 h exposure. The dashed line depicts the initial inoculum size of 5.6 log CFU. The detection limit was 20 CFU mL−1. Reproduced with permission from ref. 38. Copyright© 2015 Elsevier.
Fig. 4The SEM micrographs of ZnO particles and the crystal model of different planar terminations. (a and b) P–ZnO, (c and d) S–Zn, (e and f) R–ZnO, (g and h) B–ZnO. Reproduced with permission from ref. 39 Copyright© 2016 Elsevier.
Fig. 5The SEM micrographs of electrospun PHBV18: (a) PHBV18 without ZnO. (b) PHBV18 with P–ZnO incorporated by electrospinning. The elemental map analysis for zinc was carried out using EDAX on the SEM micrographs; the results of mapping are shown in red. The inset shows the detailed image of the fibers containing P–ZnO. Reproduced with permission from ref. 39 Copyright© 2016 Elsevier.
Fig. 6(a) The SEM image of the surface of pure chitosan film with the inserted schematic diagram; (b) the SEM cross-sectional image of pure chitosan film; (c) the SEM surface image of the chitosan/TiO2 film with the inserted schematic diagram; (d) the SEM cross-sectional image of the chitosan/TiO2 film; (e) the schematic diagram showing the effect of the chitosan–TiO2 composite film in protecting food from microbial infection. Reproduced with permission from ref. 46 Copyright© 2017 Elsevier.
Fig. 7(A) Load–time curves of the films based on thermoplastic corn starch (TPS) with 0 and 5% w/w talc nanoparticles obtained from the propagation tear resistance assays. The tested specimens of TPS films with (B) 0 and (C) 5% w/w talc nanoparticles. Reproduced with permission from ref. 46 Copyright© 2017 Elsevier.
Fig. 8SiO2in situ enhanced the PVA/CS biodegradable films by hydrolysis of sodium metasilicate. Reproduced with permission from ref. 64 Copyright© 2018 Elsevier.
Biodegradability of commonly imbedded nanoparticles showing the functionality of these nanoparticles with the possible matrix formed as well as the applicable findings attained through these materials
| Imbedded nanoparticles | Functionality | Matrix | Findings | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag NPs | To improve the mechanical properties | Chitosan, gelatin, polyethylene glycol | The film was appropriate as an antimicrobial biodegradable food packaging material |
|
| To reduce visible light penetration | ||||
| They are used for their effective antimicrobial and pathogenic activity | Montmorillonite K10, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) | The nanocomposite film was fully degraded within 110 days |
| |
| It had effective antimicrobial and antipathogenic activities | ||||
| ZnO NPs | To enhance the biodegradable food packaging materials | Soybean protein isolate (SPI) | It improved the antimicrobial, thermal barrier, and mechanical properties |
|
| Nanofiller | Starch, amino acid (lysine), polypropylene glycol (PPG) | The higher the ZnO NPs content, the better the mechanical properties and lower the solubility of the resulting material |
| |
| Nanofiller | Mahua oil-based polyurethane (PU) and chitosan (CS) | Biodegradability depends on humidity and the chemical structure |
| |
| The presence of ZnO NPs supports the film's hydrophobicity by about 63% | ||||
| Excellent UV screening ability | ||||
| High transparency | ||||
| High degree of biodegradation up to 86% in 28 days | ||||
| MgO NPs | To improve the properties of biodegradable food packaging materials and their antibacterial properties | Rice starch (RS) | It can be used as a biodegradable food packaging material with good antibacterial properties |
|
| Zein NPs | To improve the mechanical properties and the water vapor barrier of the protein isolate without negatively affecting the elongation of the films | Protein isolate | The nanocomposite films were suitable to be used as biodegradable food packaging materials |
|
| Magnetite NPs (Fe3O4) | Nanofiller | Dialdehyde starch | It was considered as a potential candidate with better characteristics (low moisture content) |
|
| Silica (SiO2) | To increase the tensile strength through hydrogen bonding between silica and PVA or chitosan | PVA/chitosan | Decreased the moisture and oxygen permeability of the food packaging films to maintain the freshness |
|
| Increased the tensile strength |
Antimicrobial activity of different biodegradable packaging materials with several additives and concentrations
| Types of nano-packaging material | Additives | Concentration | Antimicrobial effect | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLA |
| 1% (w/v) PLA, 0.5% (v/v) MPO, 1% (v/v) NC | The film has antimicrobial activity against |
|
| The inoculated bacteria in the cell concentration are about 1 to 107 CFU mL−1 | ||||
| Quince seed mucilage (QSM) films with | 1% OEO | The film prevents the growth of |
| |
| The density was then set to 0.5 for 250 MacFarland (approx. 10 CFU mL−1) where the agar diffusion method was used to estimate the antibacterial activity | ||||
| Starch | Potassium sorbate | 0.3% w/w potassium sorbate | The film inhibits the growth of |
|
| Starch films with diameters of 1 and 3 cm were cut at 108–109 and 107–108 CFU mL−1 correspondingly, and the method used to determine the antimicrobial activity was agar diffusion | ||||
| Lauric acid and chitosan | 8% lauric acid was added based on the percentage of starch, starch and chitosan with different mixing ratios | The film inhibits |
| |
| Thyme essential oil (TEO) | *% (v/v) |
|
| |
| The antimicrobial effect for the film was verified by agar diffusion method where the plates were spiked with 0.1 mL of inoculum containing bacteria with 105 CFU mL−1 | ||||
| Chitosan (Ch) | Cinnamon essential oil (EO) | 0.4%, 0.8%, 1.5%, and 2% (v/v) | The antimicrobial activity was increased |
|
| Agar diffusion method was used where it was noticed that after 24 hours of incubation, the media had a bacterial count of more than 1 × 109 CFU mL−1 | ||||
| Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) containing mint extract (ME)/pomegranate peel extract (PE) | 1% Ch, 5% PVA, 1% ME, 1% PE | It showed antibacterial activity against |
| |
| About 104–105 of the bacterial concentration of the cells were incubated for 24 hours | ||||
| Green tea extract | 20% (w/v) | Effectively inhibits the microbial growth (total aerobic counts, yeasts molds, and lactic acid bacteria) at 4 °C |
| |
|
| 2 wt% | It inhibits |
| |
| Cellulose | Nisin | 2500 IU mL−1 | Inhibits the growth of |
|
| It was determined by diffusion assay | ||||
| It displays antimicrobial properties against several Gram-positive bacteria ( |
| |||
| Gelatin | Oregano ( | Increased the antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity towards fish-derived gelatin films, which was measured |
| |
| Thyme essential oil (TEO) in skate skin gelatin (SSG) film | 1% | The film inhibits the growth of |
|