Literature DB >> 35517376

Simulated death enhances learner attitudes regarding simulation.

Chang H Park1, Douglas Wetmore2, Daniel Katz1, Samuel DeMaria1, Adam I Levine1, Andrew T Goldberg1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the widespread use of simulated death in healthcare education, some view it as a controversial learning tool due to potential psychological harm. Others believe that allowing death during simulation enhances participant learning. Sparse data exist in the literature about learner attitudes towards simulated death. Our objective was to establish a link between exposure to simulated death and learner attitudes regarding simulation. Our hypothesis was that exposure to simulated death will positively affect learner attitudes towards simulation.
Methods: Anonymous surveys were distributed to participants of simulations conducted by our department from January 2014 to December 2015. Collected survey data included total number of simulation scenarios, exposure to death and participants' views towards simulation afterwards. Participants also rated the simulation on a Likert scale. We compared demographic and simulation data for participants who experienced simulated death versus participants who did not. Exposure to death and clinical level were included as predictor variables in logistic regressions using the simulator experience variables as outcomes.
Results: 250 survey responses were analysed. 64% of participants were attendings. 82% of participants experienced death during simulation. The group that experienced simulated death gave significantly higher ratings (4.77 vs 4.50, p=0.004) and a higher percentage of maximum ratings on the Likert scale (83% vs 59%, p=0.0002). More participants who experienced death thought that simulated death could enhance learning (76% vs 59%, p=0.021). When adjusted for training level, those who experienced death in simulation were nearly twice as likely to think that death can enhance learning (p=0.049) and 133% more likely to give the simulation the highest rating (p=0.036). Conclusions: Survey participants who experienced simulated death were more likely to think that death can enhance learning and more likely to give the simulation the highest rating, thereby demonstrating that exposure to simulated death positively affects learner attitudes regarding simulation. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  death; healthcare education; learner attitude; simulation; survey

Year:  2017        PMID: 35517376      PMCID: PMC8936730          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  16 in total

Review 1.  Learning under stress: how does it work?

Authors:  Marian Joëls; Zhenwei Pu; Olof Wiegert; Melly S Oitzl; Harm J Krugers
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Urology resident training with an unexpected patient death scenario: experiential learning with high fidelity simulation.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; R Jeffrey Karnes; Jacqueline J Arnold; Janee M Klipfel; Helen T Vierstraete; Mary E Johnson; Daniel R Johnson; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  First, do no harm: using simulated patient death to enhance learning?

Authors:  Heinz R Bruppacher; Ruth P Chen; Kevin Lachapelle
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Simulated death can be an appropriate training tool for medical students.

Authors:  Gary Rogers; Nicole Jones de Rooy; Paul Bowe
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Trainee Perspectives on Manikin Death During Mock Codes.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Lizotte; Véronique Latraverse; Ahmed Moussa; Christian Lachance; Keith Barrington; Annie Janvier
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 6.  Death During Simulation: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Benjamin J Heller; Samuel DeMaria; Daniel Katz; Joshua A Heller; Andrew T Goldberg
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Adding emotional stressors to training in simulated cardiopulmonary arrest enhances participant performance.

Authors:  Samuel Demaria; Ethan O Bryson; Timothy J Mooney; Jeffrey H Silverstein; David L Reich; Carol Bodian; Adam I Levine
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.251

8.  Learning through simulated independent practice leads to better future performance in a simulated crisis than learning through simulated supervised practice.

Authors:  A Goldberg; E Silverman; S Samuelson; D Katz; H M Lin; A Levine; S DeMaria
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 9.  Using high-fidelity simulation to educate nursing students about end-of-life care.

Authors:  Marilyn Smith-Stoner
Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

10.  The moral aesthetics of simulated suffering in standardized patient performances.

Authors:  Janelle S Taylor
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2011-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.