| Literature DB >> 35516880 |
Dinesh K Patel1, Sayan Deb Dutta2, Ki-Taek Lim2.
Abstract
Nanocellulose, derived from cellulose hydrolysis, has unique optical and mechanical properties, high surface area, and good biocompatibility. It is frequently used as a reinforcing agent to improve the native properties of materials. The presence of functional groups in its surface enables the alteration of its behavior and its use under different conditions. Nanocellulose is typically used in the form of cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), cellulose nanofibers (CNFs), or bacterial nanocellulose (BNC). CNCs and CNFs have a high aspect ratio with typical lengths of ∼100-250 nm and 0.1-2 μm, respectively; BNC is nanostructured cellulose produced by bacteria. Nanohybrid materials are a combination of organic or inorganic nanomaterials with macromolecules forming a single composite and typically exhibit superior optical, thermal, and mechanical properties to those of native polymers, owing to the greater interactions between the macromolecule matrix and the nanomaterials. Excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability make nanocellulose an ideal material for applications in biomedicine. Unlike native polymers, nanocellulose-based nanohybrids exhibit a sustained drug release ability, which can be further optimized by changing the content or chemical environment of the nanocellulose, as well as the external stimuli, such as the pH and electric fields. In this review, we describe the process of extraction of nanocellulose from different natural sources; its effects on the structural, morphological, and mechanical properties of polymers; and its various applications. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35516880 PMCID: PMC9065078 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra03261d
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Chemical structure and intra, intermolecular hydrogen bonding in cellulose. Reproduced with permission from ref. 6; Copyright 2014, Elsevier.
Comparative study of different types of nanocellulose. Table obtained from ref. 16; published by The AIMS Press
| Nanocellulose | Typical sources | Approximate dimensions | Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) | Hardwood, softwood, plants, agricultural residues, bacteria, | 4–70 nm in width and 100–6000 nm in length | High surface area, excellent mechanical properties, low density and low coefficient of thermal expansion |
| Cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) | Hardwood, softwood, plants, agricultural residues, bacteria, | 20–100 nm in width, and >10 000 nm in length | Low density, high surface area, and good mechanical strength |
| Bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) | Low molecular weight sugars such as glucose | 10–50 nm in width, and >1000 nm in length | Excellent mechanical strength, high purity, and greater stability |
| Amorphous nanocellulose (ANC) | Cotton, wood pulp | 20–120 nm in width, and 50–120 nm in length | High content of functional groups and high sorption ability |
| Cellulose nanoyarn (CNY) | Cellulose and cellulose derivatives | 100–1000 nm in width, and >10 000 nm in length | High surface area, and high blotting ability |
Fig. 2Some common surface modification of nanocellulose: (clockwise from top-right) sulfuric acid treatment provides sulfate esters, carboxylic acid halides create ester linkages, acid anhydrides create ester linkages, epoxides create ether linkages, isocyanates create urethane linkages, TEMPO mediated hypochlorite oxidation creates carboxylic acids, halogenated acetic acids create carboxymethyl surfaces, and chlorosilanes create an oligomeric silylated layer. Reproduced with permission from ref. 29; published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 3Schematic representation of biomass bio-refinery to nanocellulose intermediate and chemicals. Figure obtained from ref. 46; published by The Hindawi Publisher.
Fig. 4Schematic illustration of CNF and CNC production from fiber cell walls by mechanical and chemical treatments, respectively. Reproduced with permission from ref. 30; Copyright 2014, Elsevier.
Fig. 5(i) XRD-pattern of nanocellulose, pure PANi and PANi/nanocellulose hybrid. Reproduced with permission from ref. 54; published by The Royal Society of Chemistry, (ii) surface morphology of nanocellulose based PMMA hybrids. (a, d and g) Schematic representation of the relative CNF/PMMA distribution and SEM images of cryo-fractured surface of (b and c) CNF blended with PMMA (CNF-b-PMMA), (e and f) modified CNF blended with PMMA (mCNF-b-PMMA), and (h and i) modified CNF grafted with PMMA (mCNF-g-PMMA). Reproduced with permission from ref. 59; Copyright 2018, American Chemical Society, and (iii) 5 μm × 5 μm AFM images of (a) 5 (z-scale: 800 nm) and (b) 10 (z-scale: 600 nm) layers of CNC-PANI ink and (c) 5 and (d) 10 layers (z-scale: 1000 nm) of the PANI ink printed on MLCC paper and (e) the bare MLCC paper substrate (z-scale: 600 nm). Reproduced with permission from ref. 64; published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Fig. 6(i) Mechanical properties of nanocomposite films with different cellulose nanofibril contents: (a) stress–strain curves, (b) Young's moduli, (c) ultimate tensile strengths, and (d) work of fractures. Reproduced with permission from ref. 66; Copyright 2013, American Chemical Society, and (ii) typical oscillatory rheological behavior, as shown by the nanohybrid hydrogel with a 1.5 wt% cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) and 1.0 wt% methyl cellulose (MC) loading: (a) frequency sweep preformed between 0.1–300 rad s−1 at 60 °C (red) and 20 °C (blue), determined at 10% strain; (b) strain sweeps at 60 °C (red) and 20 °C (blue), determined at an angular frequency of 6.283 rad s−1. The linear low strain G′ value was ca. 510 Pa at 60 °C. Reproduced with permission from ref. 75; Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society.
Physical and mechanical properties of MFC reinforced amylopectin-based foam with varying MFC contents. The samples have been conditioned in 50% relative humidity and 22 °C for 48 h. The values within parenthesis are the sample standard deviation. Reproduced with permission from ref. 71; Copyright 2008, Wiley Publication
| MFC (wt%) | Young's modulus (MPa) | Yield strength (kPa) | Density | Relative density, ( | Water content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 4.9 (1.1) | 170 (25) | 103 (2.08) | 0.084 | 11.0 |
| 10 | 5.0 (1.0) | 310 (91) | 109 (2.79) | 0.088 | 10.3 |
| 40 | 7.0 (0.61) | 510 (21) | 95.1 (1.02) | 0.073 | 8.4 |
| 70 | 1.7 (0.40) | 110 (78) | 86.5 (1.29) | 0.063 | 7.3 |
The theoretical density of the cell wall.
Fig. 7(i) TGA, and (ii) DTA curve of PLA and its indicated nanohybrids. Reproduced with permission from ref. 80; published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Thermal analysis parameters for pure PLA, SCNFs and the nanohybrids with various SCNF (spherical nanocellulose formats) content. Reproduced with permission from ref. 80; published by The Royal Society of Chemistrya
| Samples |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLA | 335.7 | 325.9 | 354.6 | 363.9 | 319.95 |
| 1 wt% | 336.3 | 327.0 | 357.0 | 369.4 | 360.13 |
| 3 wt% | 342.2 | 332.4 | 361.6 | 371.5 | 380.61 |
| 5 wt% | 342.6 | 333.0 | 363.1 | 372.3 | 407.57 |
| 10 wt% | 353.8 | 342.2 | 376.1 | 390.0 | 414.77 |
| 15 wt% | 350.8 | 338.9 | 373.5 | 383.4 | 395.16 |
| 20 wt% | 346.6 | 331.4 | 366.3 | 379.2 | 373.37 |
| SCNFs | 323.1 | 292.2 | 358.0 | 368.3 | 248.3 |
E a (activation energy).
T o, T 5%, T max, and Tf were obtained from the TGA curve at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1.
Thermal transitions and crystallinity (a) of matrices and cross-linked nanohybrids reinforced at various BC loadings. Reproduced with permission from ref. 73; published by The Royal Society of Chemistry
| Samples |
|
| Δ |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVA 10 | 76.2 | 224.7 | 69.7 | 0.43 | 0.43 |
| PVA/BC 10(10) | 79.7 | 236.4 | 68.3 | 0.42 | 0.47 |
| PVA 5 | 69.2 | 225.3 | 73.3 | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| PVA/BC 20(5) | 78.8 | 230.6 | 48.1 | 0.30 | 0.37 |
| PVA 2.5 | 63.5 | 228.1 | 59.3 | 0.37 | 0.37 |
| PVA/BC 30(2.5) | 84.2 | 229.8 | 43.9 | 0.23 | 0.33 |
X c = ΔHm/ΔH0m and Xp = Xc/w; with ΔH0m = 161.6 J g−1.
Fig. 8(i) Comparative UV-vis transmission spectrum of 1 mm hydrogels with (a) 10% PVA, (b) 10% PVA and 1% CNF, (c) 10% PVA and 1% CNC, and (d) 10% PVA and 1% CNF/CNC. Reproduced with permission from ref. 31; Copyright 2016, American Chemical Society, and (ii) (a) a digital image of magnetic paper with 10 wt% Fe3O4 NPs shows the transparency and flexibility, (b) nanopapers with 0 wt%, 5 wt%, and 10 wt% Fe3O4 NP loading from left to right and (c) transmittance curves of magnetic papers. Reproduced with permission from ref. 96; published by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Effects of nanocellulose on the polymer properties
| Polymer matrix | Nanocellulose | Preparation technique | Properties | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polystyrene (PS) | CNC | Electrospinning | Improvement in tensile strength, wettability, crystallinity, and thermal decomposition |
|
| CNC | Extrusion | Enhancement in the mechanical properties, degradation temperature | ||
| CNF-TEMPO | Solution casting | Enhancement in the mechanical, thermal, and optical | ||
| Ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) | CNC | Electrospinning | Enhancement in thermal properties |
|
| BNC | ||||
| Poly vinyl chloride (PVC) | CNC | Hot mixing | Enhancement in the mechanical strength |
|
| CNC | Solution casting | |||
| Polymethyl methacrylate(PMMA) | CNC | Solution casting | Improvement in the mechanical and degradation temperature |
|
| CNF | Immersion precipitation | Enhancement in thermal stability and storage modulus | ||
| CNF-TEMPO | Solution casting | Improvement in the mechanical strength | ||
| CNF | Solvent exchange | Enhancement in mechanical, thermal, and water content |
| |
| Polypropylene (PP) | CNF | Emulsion process | Enhancement in the mechanical strength |
|
| CNC | Melt extrusion | Improvement in the mechanical, thermal and crystallinity | ||
| Poly(lactide) (PLA) | CNC | Solution casting | Enhancement in thermal, mechanical and crystallinity |
|
| CNF | ||||
| CNF-TEMPO | Homogenous dispersion in organic solvents, improvement in mechanical strength, and decrease in the glass transition temperature |
| ||
| CNF | Suspension coating | Enhancement in the mechanical, thermal and crystallization behavior |
| |
| CNC | Enhancement in the mechanical, water uptake and biocompatibility |
| ||
| Polyethylene (PE) | CNC | Melt extrusion | Improvement in thermal and mechanical strength |
|
| Polyimide (PI) | CNC | Spin coating | Improvement in thermal, mechanical, barrier and optical properties |
|
| Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) | CNC | Solution casting | Improvement in optical transparency, water content, and mechanical strength |
|
| CNF | ||||
| BNC |
| Enhancement in thermal, mechanical, and cell proliferation |
| |
| Polyaniline (PANi) | CNC |
| Enhancement in electrochemical properties, thermal behavior, and crystallinity |
|
| CNC | Emulsion polymerization | Enhancement in electrochemical properties, and mechanical strength |
| |
| Methylcellulose (MC) | CNC | Solution casting | Enhancement in the mechanical strength |
|
| Poly(butylene adipate- | CNC | Melt extrusion | Enhancement in thermal, mechanical, and biocompatibility |
|
| Chitosan | CNF | Solution casting | Enhancement in mechanical, crystallinity and sustained drug delivery |
|
| Poly( | BNC |
| Improvement in biocompatibility and sustained drug release |
|
Fig. 9(i) MTT assay cell viability of L929 cells for (a) MA-g-PBAT, (b) CNC, (c) 3% CNC, and (d) 9% CNC samples at specified incubation times. Reproduced with permission from ref. 126; Copyright 2017, American Chemical Society, and (ii) influence of materials and surface roughness on NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblast cell morphology and spreading at varying time points (4, 24, and 48 h): (a) control PLA, (b) PLA CNW-75, (c) PLA PVAc, and (d) control TCP (tissue culture plastic). Reproduced with permission from ref. 114; Copyright 2014, American Chemical Society.
Fig. 10(i) Drug release profiles of polymer and it's indicated nanohybrids. Reproduced with permission from ref. 118; published by The Royal Society of Chemistry, and (ii) diclofenac dissolution profile at pH 2.1 (□) and 7.4 (○) from PMGly/BC/DCF nanocomposite membrane. The lines are for visual guidance only. Reproduced with permission from ref. 119; Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
Nanocellulose-based polymer hybrids for tissue engineering applications
| Nanocellulose-based polymer nanohybrids | Nature of materials | Applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| BNC/heparin | Scaffolds | Tissue engineering |
|
| BNC/potato Starch (PS) | |||
| BNC/poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate) (PHO) | |||
| BNC/polyvinyl alcohol | |||
| BNC/collagen | |||
| BNC/silk fibroin | |||
| BNC/Chitosan | |||
| BNC/collagen | |||
| Poly(oligoethylene glycol methacrylate)/CNCs | Injectable hydrogel | Tissue engineering |
|
| CNFs/gelatin | Cryogels hydrogels | Controlled drug delivery |
|
| CNFs-Ag/alginate | Antibacterial | ||
| BNC/acrylic acid | Drug delivery | ||
| BNC/gelatin | |||
| CNCs/chitosan |
Nanocellulose-based materials for application of wastewater treatment
| Materials | Removal of | Adsorption potential (mg g−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium hydroxyapatite/microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) | Cr( | 114.7 |
|
| Aminopropyltriethoxysilane modified (APS)/MFC | Ni( | 159.8 |
|
| Cu( | 200.1 | ||
| Cd( | 471.5 | ||
| Nanocellulose/nanobentonite composite | Co( | 350.8 |
|
| U( | 121.0 | ||
| Cellulose nanofibers (CNF) with positively charged quaternary ammonium groups | NO3− | 44.0 |
|
| F− | 10.6 | ||
| SO42− | 50.0 | ||
| PO43− | 55.0 | ||
| Cationic CNF aerogel with trimethylammonium chloride | Blue dye CR 19 | 230.0 |
|
| Red dye 180 | 160.0 | ||
| Orange dye 142 | 230.0 | ||
| Amino-modified nanocrystalline cellulose (ANCC) | Acid red GR, | 134.7 |
|
| Congo red 4BS | 199.5 | ||
| Light yellow K-4G | 183.0 | ||
| Carboxylate-modified cellulose nanocrystal (CNCs) | Crystal violet | 243.9 |
|
| Methylene blue | |||
| Malachite green | |||
| Basic fuchsin | |||
| CNCs/alginate hydrogel beads | Methylene blue | 255.5 |
|
| Phosphorylated nanocellulose | Ag( | ∼100% |
|
| Cu( | |||
| Fe( |