Literature DB >> 35516447

Should we add smells in simulation training? A systematic review of smells in healthcare-related simulation training.

Samuel John Wilfrid Kent1, Frances Helen Kent2, Craig William Brown2, Ian Gordon Morrison2, Jerry Charles Morse2.   

Abstract

Olfactory stimuli are rarely used in healthcare-related simulation training. Their addition may improve simulator validity, biographical memory formation and coping mechanisms for exposure to strong malodours. Some military simulators already employ smells in simulation training, and the technology and principles may be used to cross over into medical simulation training. We set out to determine if there is evidence to suggest that smell should be routinely incorporated into medical simulation training. We carried out a systematic review of the literature relating to use of olfactory stimuli in medical simulation training, and identified 5 relevant papers. 3 were experimental studies and 2 were observational studies. The results of the experimental studies were mixed, though there were some indications that the use of a clinically relevant smell instead of a congruent background smell may be more effective. We discuss the benefits of the inclusion of smell in simulation training and identify that there are currently few high-quality studies addressing the use of smell in medical simulation training. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Olfaction; Simulation; Smell; Training

Year:  2016        PMID: 35516447      PMCID: PMC8936626          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  15 in total

1.  Simulation, safety and surgery.

Authors:  Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-10

2.  Odor-associative learning and emotion: effects on perception and behavior.

Authors:  Rachel S Herz
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 3.  Incorporating the sense of smell into patient and haptic surgical simulators.

Authors:  Brandon S Spencer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2006-01

4.  Improving wound care simulation with the addition of odor: a descriptive, quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Donna W Roberson; Janice A Neil; Elizabeth T Bryant
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  The olfactory examination: a waft of disease.

Authors:  Samuel Kent; Frances Parkinson
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2013-12

Review 6.  Autobiographical odor memory.

Authors:  Maria Larsson; Johan Willander
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  The effect of an olfactory and visual cue on realism and engagement in a health care simulation experience.

Authors:  Karen C Nanji; Kirsten Baca; Daniel B Raemer
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 8.  Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review.

Authors:  S Barry Issenberg; William C McGaghie; Emil R Petrusa; David Lee Gordon; Ross J Scalese
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  No effect of ambient odor on the affective appraisal of a desktop virtual environment with signs of disorder.

Authors:  Alexander Toet; Martin van Schaik; Nicolet C M Theunissen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.