Literature DB >> 35515717

Use of three-dimensional printing for simulation in ultrasound education: a scoping review.

Patrick Gallagher1, Ryan Smith1, Gillian Sheppard1.   

Abstract

Background: There is a significant learning curve when teaching ultrasonography to medical trainees; task trainers can help learners to bridge this gap and develop their skills. Three-dimensional printing technology has the potential to be a great tool in the development of such simulators. Objective: This scoping review aimed to identify what 3D-printed models have been used in ultrasound education to date, how they were created and the pros and limitations involved. Design: Researchers searched three online databases to identify 3D-printed ultrasound models used in medical education.
Results: Twelve suitable publications were identified for inclusion in this review. The models from included articles simulated largely low frequency and/or high stakes events, with many models simulating needle guidance procedures. Most models were created by using patient imaging data and a computer-aided design software to print structures directly or print casting molds. The benefits of 3D-printed educational trainers are their low cost, reproducibility, patient specificity and accuracy. The current limitations of this technology are upfront investments and a lack of optimisation of materials. Conclusions: The use of 3D-printed ultrasound task trainers is in its infancy, and more research is needed to determine whether or not this technology will benefit medical learners in the future. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Simulation Based Education; Task Trainers And Clinical Skills Centers; Ultrasound

Year:  2020        PMID: 35515717      PMCID: PMC8936891          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  26 in total

1.  The role of ultrasound simulators in education: an investigation into sonography student experiences and clinical mentor perceptions.

Authors:  Vivien Gibbs
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  A Novel Clinical-Simulated Suture Education for Basic Surgical Skill: Suture on the Biological Tissue Fixed on Standardized Patient Evaluated with Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) Tools.

Authors:  Zhanlong Shen; Fan Yang; Pengji Gao; Li Zeng; Guanchao Jiang; Shan Wang; Yingjiang Ye; Fengxue Zhu
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Use of 3-Dimensional Printing to Create Patient-Specific Thoracic Spine Models as Task Trainers.

Authors:  Jelliffe Jeganathan; Yanick Baribeau; Jeffrey Bortman; Feroze Mahmood; Marc Shnider; Muneeb Ahmed; Azad Mashari; Rabia Amir; Yannis Amador; Robina Matyal
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

4.  Cognitive load imposed by ultrasound-facilitated teaching does not adversely affect gross anatomy learning outcomes.

Authors:  Heather A Jamniczky; Darrel Cotton; Michael Paget; Qahir Ramji; Ryan Lenz; Kevin McLaughlin; Sylvain Coderre; Irene W Y Ma
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Incorporating three-dimensional printing into a simulation-based congenital heart disease and critical care training curriculum for resident physicians.

Authors:  John P Costello; Laura J Olivieri; Lillian Su; Axel Krieger; Fahad Alfares; Omar Thabit; M Blair Marshall; Shi-Joon Yoo; Peter C Kim; Richard A Jonas; Dilip S Nath
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.007

6.  Improving Clinical Proficiency Using a 3-Dimensionally Printed and Patient-Specific Thoracic Spine Model as a Haptic Task Trainer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Bortman; Yanick Baribeau; Jelliffe Jeganathan; Yannis Amador; Faraz Mahmood; Marc Shnider; Muneeb Ahmed; Philip Hess; Robina Matyal
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.288

7.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Erin Lillie; Wasifa Zarin; Kelly K O'Brien; Heather Colquhoun; Danielle Levac; David Moher; Micah D J Peters; Tanya Horsley; Laura Weeks; Susanne Hempel; Elie A Akl; Christine Chang; Jessie McGowan; Lesley Stewart; Lisa Hartling; Adrian Aldcroft; Michael G Wilson; Chantelle Garritty; Simon Lewin; Christina M Godfrey; Marilyn T Macdonald; Etienne V Langlois; Karla Soares-Weiser; Jo Moriarty; Tammy Clifford; Özge Tunçalp; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Anatomically realistic ultrasound phantoms using gel wax with 3D printed moulds.

Authors:  Efthymios Maneas; Wenfeng Xia; Daniil I Nikitichev; Batol Daher; Maniragav Manimaran; Rui Yen J Wong; Chia-Wei Chang; Benyamin Rahmani; Claudio Capelli; Silvia Schievano; Gaetano Burriesci; Sebastien Ourselin; Anna L David; Malcolm C Finlay; Simeon J West; Tom Vercauteren; Adrien E Desjardins
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  The Principles and Procedures of Ultrasound-guided Anesthesia Techniques.

Authors:  Jeffrey Huang; Jinlei Li; Hong Wang
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-07-13

Review 10.  Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Valeria Filippou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.