| Literature DB >> 35515207 |
Xiao-Cui Liu1,2, Hongran Li1,3,4, Tong Kang1,3,4, Zhen-Yuan Zhu1,3,4, Ying-Liang Liu5, Hui-Qing Sun1,3,4, Li-Chao Pan1,3,4.
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of fermentation conditions on the structure and anti-tumor activity of intracellular polysaccharides (IPS) of Cordyceps gunnii (C. gunnii) in submerged fermentation. The environmental and nutritional conditions are determined in a shaker flask by a single factor test. The inhibition of IPS on S180 cells was as an optimization index. The results show that the optimal fermentation conditions of C. gunnii are an initial pH value of 6, a temperature of 25 °C, a rotation speed of 150 rpm, 4% glucose, and 1.0% peptone. Under these conditions, the macro molecular weight (M w) polysaccharide content and anti-tumor activity of IPS are significantly higher than that in the basal culture medium. GC, HPGPC, periodate oxidation-Smith degradation, NMR, and FT-IR determine the structural characteristics of CPS-JC and CPS-YH (pure IPS cultured in basal culture medium and optimal culture medium, respectively). The results indicate that CPS-JC is mainly composed of α-d-glucans, whereas CPS-YH primarily contain α-d-glucans with a trace amount of β-d-glucans. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35515207 PMCID: PMC9064820 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra01202h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Effects of different fermentation conditions on the molecular weight distribution and production of IPS in submerged cultivation of Cordyceps gunniia
| Group | IPS production (mg/100 mL) | Macro | Medium | Low |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| pH = 5 | 84.01 ± 3.01* | 78.919 | 10.9574 | 10.123 |
| pH = 6 | 95.47 ± 2.92 | 82.717 | 5.972 | 11.311 |
| pH = 7 | 80.63 ± 4.24* | 72.554 | 13.2682 | 14.178 |
| pH = 8 | 66.21 ± 3.96** | 81.747 | 8.476± | 9.786 |
|
| ||||
| 20 °C | 86.41 ± 4.36* | 84.548 | 6.440 | 9.012 |
| 25 °C | 97.36 ± 4.35 | 89.910 | 6.560 | 2.529 |
| 30 °C | 67.08 ± 3.46** | 80.449 | 9.009 | 5.726 |
|
| ||||
| 100 rpm | 89.45 ± 4.37 | 82.956 | 11.0790 | 4.264 |
| 150 rpm | 90.74 ± 4.21 | 85.312 | 8.197 | 3.246 |
| 180 rpm | 87.39 ± 3.79 | 73.838 | 9.835 | 8.146 |
|
| ||||
| Sucrose | 83.25 ± 4.03* | 76.146 | 9.821 | 14.033 |
| Glucose | 93.00 ± 6.84 | 77.766 | 12.2883 | 9.737 |
| Soluble starch | 81.47 ± 3.97* | 54.546 | 42.1617 | 3.293 |
|
| ||||
| Peptone | 98.87 ± 4.77 | 87.057 | 0 | 12.943 |
| Yeast extract powder | 85.59 ± 3.36* | 66.016 | 13.7327 | 20.252 |
| NaNO3 | 56.05 ± 4.47** | 73.252 | 17.7811 | 8.967 |
|
| ||||
| 1% | 87.61 ± 4.53* | 66.356 | 19.5361 | 14.108 |
| 2% | 62.45 ± 3.74** | 66.654 | 20.1321 | 13.214 |
| 3% | 93.98 ± 4.51* | 54.083 | 16.7526 | 29.166 |
| 4% | 138.78 ± 5.24 | 71.046 | 14.5347 | 14.420 |
| 5% | 32.64 ± 3.15** | 65.861 | 19.8571 | 14.281 |
|
| ||||
| 0.5% | 67.27 ± 2.46** | 75.104 | 10.425 | 14.471 |
| 1.0% | 130.41 ± 4.79 | 86.531 | 4.336 | 5.133 |
| 1.5% | 67.12 ± 2.31** | 77.616 | 3.690 | 17.695 |
| 2.0% | 58.09 ± 2.36** | 80.019 | 8.140 | 11.841 |
| 2.5% | 80.51 ± 1.89* | 79.668 | 4.587 | 15.745 |
|
| ||||
| JC | 99.63 ± 3.16* | 73.070 | 16.253 | 10.677 |
| YH | 115.27 ± 4.28 | 82.326 | 15.2471 | 2.427 |
Experiments were performed in triplicate and results were presented as mean ± SD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. maximum IPS production.
Fig. 1The growth inhibitory effect of polysaccharide on S180 cell at different concentrations (n = 6) under different pH values (A), temperatures (B), rotation speed (C), carbon sources (D), nitrogen sources (E), carbon source concentrations (F), and nitrogen source concentrations (G). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. the highest inhibition rate at the same concentration of different groups.
Fig. 2Elution profiles of JC (A) and YH (B) in Sephadex G-100 column chromatography; HPGPC profiles of CPS-JC (C) and CPS-YH (D); the growth inhibitory effect of CPS-JC and CPS-YH (E) on S180 cell at different concentrations (n = 6). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared to the control.
Fig. 3Thin-Layer Chromatography (TLC) of CPS-JC and CPS-YH (A) after acid hydrolysis; the gas chromatography (GC) of derivatives CPS-JC (B) and CPS-YH (C).
Fig. 4The IR spectrum of CPS-JC (A) and CPS-YH (B).
Fig. 51H NMR spectra of CPS-JC (A) and CPS-YH (B); 13C NMR spectra of CPS-JC (C) and CPS-YH (D) in D2O; GC chromatograms of the Smith degradation of CPS-JC (E) and CPS-YH (F).