Matthew S Braga1,2,3, Michelle D Tyler1,2,3, Jared M Rhoads1, Michael P Cacchio1,4, Marc Auerbach5, Akira Nishisaki6, Robin J Larson1,3,7. 1. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA. 2. The Children's Hospital at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA. 3. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. 4. Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA. 5. Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale, Connecticut, USA. 6. Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 7. VA Outcomes Group, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, White River Junction, Vermont, USA.
Abstract
Background: Providing simulation training directly before an actual clinical procedure-or 'just-in-time' (JiT)-is resource intensive, but could improve both provider performance and patient outcomes. Objectives: To assess the effects of JiT simulation training versus no JiT training on provider performance and patient complications following clinical procedures on patients. Study selection: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, ClinicalTrials.gov, simulation journals indexes and references of included studies during October 2014 for randomised trials, non-randomised trials and before-after studies comparing JiT simulation training versus no JiT training among providers performing clinical procedures. Findings were synthesised qualitatively. Findings: Of 1805 records screened, 8 studies comprising 3540 procedures and 1969 providers were eligible. 5 involved surgical procedures; the other 3 included paediatric endotracheal intubations, central venous catheter dressing changes, or infant lumbar puncture. Methodological quality was high. Of the 8 studies evaluating provider performance, 5 favoured JiT simulation training with 18-48% relative improvement on validated clinical performance scales, 16-20% relative reduction in surgical time and 12% absolute reduction in corrective prompts during central venous catheter dressing changes; 3 studies were equivocal with no improvement in intubation success, lumbar puncture success or urological surgery clinical performance scores. 3 studies evaluated patient complications; 1 favoured JiT simulation training with 45% relative reduction in central line-associated blood stream infections; 2 studies found no differences following intubation or laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions: JiT simulation training improves provider performance, but currently available literature does not demonstrate a reduction in patient complications. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Background: Providing simulation training directly before an actual clinical procedure-or 'just-in-time' (JiT)-is resource intensive, but could improve both provider performance and patient outcomes. Objectives: To assess the effects of JiT simulation training versus no JiT training on provider performance and patient complications following clinical procedures on patients. Study selection: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, ClinicalTrials.gov, simulation journals indexes and references of included studies during October 2014 for randomised trials, non-randomised trials and before-after studies comparing JiT simulation training versus no JiT training among providers performing clinical procedures. Findings were synthesised qualitatively. Findings: Of 1805 records screened, 8 studies comprising 3540 procedures and 1969 providers were eligible. 5 involved surgical procedures; the other 3 included paediatric endotracheal intubations, central venous catheter dressing changes, or infant lumbar puncture. Methodological quality was high. Of the 8 studies evaluating provider performance, 5 favoured JiT simulation training with 18-48% relative improvement on validated clinical performance scales, 16-20% relative reduction in surgical time and 12% absolute reduction in corrective prompts during central venous catheter dressing changes; 3 studies were equivocal with no improvement in intubation success, lumbar puncture success or urological surgery clinical performance scores. 3 studies evaluated patient complications; 1 favoured JiT simulation training with 45% relative reduction in central line-associated blood stream infections; 2 studies found no differences following intubation or laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions: JiT simulation training improves provider performance, but currently available literature does not demonstrate a reduction in patient complications. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Authors: Akira Nishisaki; Aaron J Donoghue; Shawn Colborn; Christine Watson; Andrew Meyer; Calvin A Brown; Mark A Helfaer; Ron M Walls; Vinay M Nadkarni Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Darcy A Reed; David A Cook; Thomas J Beckman; Rachel B Levine; David E Kern; Scott M Wright Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-09-05 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Gamal Abdalla; Erin Moran-Atkin; Grace Chen; Michael A Schweitzer; Thomas H Magnuson; Kimberley E Steele Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: William C McGaghie; Timothy J Draycott; William F Dunn; Connie M Lopez; Dimitrios Stefanidis Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: David A Cook; Rose Hatala; Ryan Brydges; Benjamin Zendejas; Jason H Szostek; Amy T Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Stanley J Hamstra Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Michael J Chen; Aditee Ambardekar; Susan M Martinelli; Lauren K Buhl; Daniel P Walsh; Lior Levy; Cindy Ku; Lindsay A Rubenstein; Sara Neves; John D Mitchell Journal: J Educ Perioper Med Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Andrea G Tenner; Anya L Greenberg; Paulina Nicholaus; Christian C Rose; Newton Addo; Catherine Reuben Shari; Alexandra Friedman; Upendo N George; Michael J Losak; Juma A Mfinanga; Hendry R Sawe Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Nathaniel T G Tighe; Craig D McClain; Bistra G Vlassakova; Joseph P Cravero; James M Peyton; Pete G Kovatsis; Raymond S Park; Mary Lyn Stein Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 2.129