Literature DB >> 35515199

Effect of just-in-time simulation training on provider performance and patient outcomes for clinical procedures: a systematic review.

Matthew S Braga1,2,3, Michelle D Tyler1,2,3, Jared M Rhoads1, Michael P Cacchio1,4, Marc Auerbach5, Akira Nishisaki6, Robin J Larson1,3,7.   

Abstract

Background: Providing simulation training directly before an actual clinical procedure-or 'just-in-time' (JiT)-is resource intensive, but could improve both provider performance and patient outcomes.
Objectives: To assess the effects of JiT simulation training versus no JiT training on provider performance and patient complications following clinical procedures on patients. Study selection: We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, ClinicalTrials.gov, simulation journals indexes and references of included studies during October 2014 for randomised trials, non-randomised trials and before-after studies comparing JiT simulation training versus no JiT training among providers performing clinical procedures. Findings were synthesised qualitatively. Findings: Of 1805 records screened, 8 studies comprising 3540 procedures and 1969 providers were eligible. 5 involved surgical procedures; the other 3 included paediatric endotracheal intubations, central venous catheter dressing changes, or infant lumbar puncture. Methodological quality was high. Of the 8 studies evaluating provider performance, 5 favoured JiT simulation training with 18-48% relative improvement on validated clinical performance scales, 16-20% relative reduction in surgical time and 12% absolute reduction in corrective prompts during central venous catheter dressing changes; 3 studies were equivocal with no improvement in intubation success, lumbar puncture success or urological surgery clinical performance scores. 3 studies evaluated patient complications; 1 favoured JiT simulation training with 45% relative reduction in central line-associated blood stream infections; 2 studies found no differences following intubation or laparoscopic nephrectomy. Conclusions: JiT simulation training improves provider performance, but currently available literature does not demonstrate a reduction in patient complications. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical competence; just-in-time; simulation; systematic review

Year:  2015        PMID: 35515199      PMCID: PMC8936624          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  29 in total

1.  Effect of just-in-time simulation training on tracheal intubation procedure safety in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Authors:  Akira Nishisaki; Aaron J Donoghue; Shawn Colborn; Christine Watson; Andrew Meyer; Calvin A Brown; Mark A Helfaer; Ron M Walls; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The Kirkpatrick model: A useful tool for evaluating training outcomes.

Authors:  Andy Smidt; Susan Balandin; Jeff Sigafoos; Vicki A Reed
Journal:  J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2009-09

3.  Association between funding and quality of published medical education research.

Authors:  Darcy A Reed; David A Cook; Thomas J Beckman; Rachel B Levine; David E Kern; Scott M Wright
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Technology-enhanced simulation to assess health professionals: a systematic review of validity evidence, research methods, and reporting quality.

Authors:  David A Cook; Ryan Brydges; Benjamin Zendejas; Stanley J Hamstra; Rose Hatala
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 5.  The effect of warm-up on surgical performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gamal Abdalla; Erin Moran-Atkin; Grace Chen; Michael A Schweitzer; Thomas H Magnuson; Kimberley E Steele
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Effects of a just-in-time educational intervention placed on wound dressing packages: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dea J Kent
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.741

7.  Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes.

Authors:  William C McGaghie; Timothy J Draycott; William F Dunn; Connie M Lopez; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 8.  Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Rose Hatala; Ryan Brydges; Benjamin Zendejas; Jason H Szostek; Amy T Wang; Patricia J Erwin; Stanley J Hamstra
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 9.  Central venous access by trainees: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of simulation to improve success rate on patients.

Authors:  Arin L Madenci; Carolina V Solis; Marc A de Moya
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.929

10.  Technology-enhanced simulation and pediatric education: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adam Cheng; Tara R Lang; Stephanie R Starr; Martin Pusic; David A Cook
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  4 in total

1.  Defining and Addressing Anesthesiology Needs in Simulation-based Medical Education.

Authors:  Michael J Chen; Aditee Ambardekar; Susan M Martinelli; Lauren K Buhl; Daniel P Walsh; Lior Levy; Cindy Ku; Lindsay A Rubenstein; Sara Neves; John D Mitchell
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2022-04-01

2.  Mobile application adjunct to the WHO basic emergency care course: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Andrea G Tenner; Anya L Greenberg; Paulina Nicholaus; Christian C Rose; Newton Addo; Catherine Reuben Shari; Alexandra Friedman; Upendo N George; Michael J Losak; Juma A Mfinanga; Hendry R Sawe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  White Cane Approach to Teaching Spinal Anesthesia.

Authors:  Donald H Lambert; BobbieJean Sweitzer
Journal:  A A Pract       Date:  2022-08-04

4.  Aerosol barriers in pediatric anesthesiology: Clinical data supports FDA caution.

Authors:  Nathaniel T G Tighe; Craig D McClain; Bistra G Vlassakova; Joseph P Cravero; James M Peyton; Pete G Kovatsis; Raymond S Park; Mary Lyn Stein
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.129

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.