| Literature DB >> 35515148 |
Sherif S Ebada1,2,3, Nariman A Al-Jawabri2, Fadia S Youssef1,3, Dina H El-Kashef1,4, Tim-Oliver Knedel5, Amgad Albohy6, Michal Korinek7,8,9, Tsong-Long Hwang8,9,10, Bing-Hung Chen7,11,12, Guan-Hua Lin13, Chia-Yi Lin13, Sa'ed M Aldalaien2, Ahmad M Disi14, Christoph Janiak5, Peter Proksch1.
Abstract
On Wednesday 11th March, 2020, the world health organization (WHO) announced novel coronavirus (COVID-19, also called SARS-CoV-2) as a pandemic. Due to time shortage and lack of either a vaccine and/or an effective treatment, many trials focused on testing natural products to find out potential lead candidates. In this field, an edible and folk medicinal Jordanian plant Crepis sancta (Asteraceae) was selected for this study. Phytochemical investigation of its enriched polyphenolic extract afforded four eudesmane sesquiterpenes (1-4) together with (6S,9R)-roseoside (5) and five different methylated flavonols (6-10). Structure elucidation of isolated compounds was unambiguously determined based on HRESIMS, X-ray crystallography, and exhaustive 1D and 2D NMR experiments. All isolated compounds were assessed for their in vitro anti-inflammatory, antiallergic and in silico COVID-19 main protease (Mpro) inhibitory activities. Among the tested compounds, compounds 5-10 revealed potent anti-inflammatory, antiallergic and COVID-19 protease inhibitory activities. Chrysosplenetin (10) is considered as a promising anti-inflammatory and antiallergic lead structure adding to the phytotherapeutic pipeline. Moreover, its inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 Mpro, supported by docking and molecular dynamic studies, strengthens its potential as a lead structure paving the way toward finding out a natural remedy to treat and/or to control the current COVID-19 pandemic. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 35515148 PMCID: PMC9057237 DOI: 10.1039/d0ra04876c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Effects of isolated compounds from Crepis sancta on superoxide anion generation and elastase release in fMLF/cytochalasin B (CB)-induced human neutrophils
| Compound | Superoxide anion generation | Elastase release | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Inhibition | IC50 | % Inhibition | IC50 | |
| (6 | 12.05 ± 2.37 | >10 | 2.74 ± 1.90 | >10 |
| (6 | 6.23 ± 3.81 | >10 | 5.89 ± 1.07 | >10 |
| 3-Oxo-γ-costic acid (3) | 18.46 ± 5.06 | >10 | 3.89 ± 1.91 | >10 |
| 3-Oxo-γ-costic acid methyl ester (4) | 18.27 ± 4.97 | >10 | 0.70 ± 1.60 | >10 |
| (6 | 9.43 ± 5.12 | >10 | 2.72 ± 1.78 | >10 |
| Jaceidin (6) | 80.26 ± 6.22 | 4.76 ± 0.83 | 48.22 ± 6.61 | >10 |
| Kumatakenin (7) | 24.06 ± 2.75 | >10 | 22.92 ± 4.29 | >10 |
| Penduletin (8) | 73.76 ± 5.24 | 5.66 ± 0.19 | 33.00 ± 7.94 | >10 |
| Pachypodol (9) | 67.46 ± 4.55 | 6.07 ± 0.65 | 31.56 ± 5.02 | >10 |
| Chrysosplenetin (10) | 92.03 ± 3.95 | 4.32 ± 0.57 | 65.82 ± 5.75 | 6.66 ± 1.03 |
| Genistein |
| 1.52 ± 0.17 | 31.57 ± 7.29 | 16.34 ± 4.26 |
Percentage of inhibition (Inh%) at 10 μM concentration.
Concentration necessary for 50% inhibition (IC50). Results are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3–6). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 compared with the control (0.1% DMSO).
Genistein inhibited 67.01 ± 2.38% of superoxide anion generation at 3 μM.
Inhibitory activity of isolated compounds from Crepis sancta on A23187- and antigen-induced degranulation
| Compound | % Viability, RBL-2H3 | % Inhibition of A23187-induced degranulation | % Inhibition of antigen-induced degranulation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 μM | 1 μM | 10 μM | 100 μM | IC50 | 1 μM | 10 μM | 100 μM | IC50 | |
| (6 | >90% | 2.1 ± 1.8 | 7.6 ± 6.6 | 7.7 ± 3.8 | 11.3 ± 3.6 | ||||
| (6 | >90% | 0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | 11.7 ± 4.2 | 19.8 ± 2.5 | ||||
| 3-Oxo-γ-costic acid (3) | >90% | 2.7 ± 2.3 | 1.8 ± 1.6 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | ||||
| 3-Oxo-γ-costic acid methyl ester (4) | >90% | 7.2 ± 5.9 | 61.8 ± 7.4*** | 80.6 | 18.2 ± 4.4 | 36.2 ± 6.5*** | |||
| (6 | >90% | 5.3 ± 4.3 | 16.8 ± 7.9 | 19.9 ± 4.3 | 21.6 ± 1.8 | ||||
| Jaceidin (6) | >90% | 5.3 ± 4.3 | 25.5 ± 5.0* | 3.9 ± 2.9 | 46.5 ± 10.2*** | ||||
| Kumatakenin (7) | >90% | 12.6 ± 9.1 | 36.8 ± 5.4 | 11.1 ± 7.6 | 60.9 ± 8.8*** | 80.4 | |||
| Penduletin (8) | >90% | 4.8 ± 3.9 | 25.1 ± 7.3 |
| 33.9 ± 8.6** | 85.8 ± 5.1*** |
| 3.8 | |
| Pachypodol (9) | >90% | 3.4 ± 2.8 | 22.6 ± 3.4 |
| 12.9 ± 6.5 | 47.2 ± 5.0*** |
| ||
| Chrysosplenetin (10) | >90% | 7.3 ± 5.9 | 41.6 ± 9.5*** |
| 12.4 ± 5.1 | 83.3 ± 7.5*** |
| 5.8 | |
| Azelastine | >90% (20 μM) | 10.9 | 15.4 | ||||||
The cytotoxicity of samples to RBL-2H3 was evaluated using MTT viability assay. Results are presented as mean (n = 3) compared to untreated control (DMSO). All samples were nontoxic towards RBL-2H3 cells.
Azelastine (20 μM) was used as a positive control and inhibited 78.4 ± 1.4% *** of A23187-induced degranulation. The inhibition of degranulation was assessed by A23187-induced β-hexosaminidase release in RBL-2H3 cells. Results are presented as mean ± S.E.M. (n = 3); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Prism, ANOVA, Dunnet's test) compared with the control value (A23187 only).
Azelastine (20 μM) was used as a positive control and inhibited 66.8 ± 9.8% *** of antigen-induced degranulation. The inhibition of degranulation was assessed by antigen-induced β-hexosaminidase release in RBL-2H3 cells. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3); *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (Prism, ANOVA, Dunnet's test) compared with the control value (antigen only).
Concentration necessary for 50% inhibition (IC50).
Compounds 8, 9 and 10 at concentration of 100 μM formed crystal-like precipitates upon the addition into medium, thus the effects could not be justified.
Fig. 1Chemical structures of isolated compounds 1–10.
Fig. 2Docking results of isolated compounds with NE (1H1B). (A) Validation of docking through redocking of the co-crystalized ligand GW475151 (gray) overlaid with the docked structure (pink). (B, C and D) Docking poses of the best docked ligands 10, 9 and 7, respectively.
Binding energy for compounds (1–10) in the active sites of neutrophil elastase (NE) and SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) showing residues forming hydrogen bonds with docked ligands. Energy and interacting residues are for the first pose unless otherwise stated
| Compound/ligand |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binding affinity (kcal mol−1) | Interacting residues | Binding affinity (kcal mol−1) | Interacting residues | |
| (6 | −5.5 | Ser195, Val216 | −5.9 | Gly143 |
| (6 | −6.2 | Ser195 | −6.1 | Gly143, Ser144, His163 |
| 3-Oxo-γ-costic acid (3) | −5.9 | Ser195 | −5.9 (4th pose) | Gly143, His163 |
| 3-Oxo-γ-costic acid methyl ester (4) | −5.9 | Ser195 | −6.0 (3rd pose) | Gly143, His163 |
| (6 | −6.4 | Phe41, Asn61, Ser195, Val216 | −7.2 | Thr26, Leu141, Gly143, Ser144, Cys145, His163, Glu166 |
| Jaceidin (6) | −6.2 | Cys191, Gly193, Ser195 | −7.3 | Leu141, Gly143, Ser144, Cys145, Arg188 |
| Kumatakenin (7) | −6.7 | Phe41, Cys191, Gly193, Ser195, Val216 | −6.8 (3rd pose) | Leu141, Gly143, Ser144 |
| Penduletin (8) | −6.1 | Cys191, Gly193, Ser195 | −6.7 (4th pose) | Leu141, Gly143, Ser144, Cys145, His163 |
| Pachypodol (9) | −6.7 | Phe41, Cys191, Gly193, Asp194, Ser195 | −7.1 | Gly143, Ser144, Cys145 |
| Chrysosplenetin (10) | −6.5 | Phe41, His57, Gly193, Ser195, Val216 | −7.1 | Leu141, Gly143, Ser144, Cys145 |
| 1H1B-ligand | −6.9 | Ser195 | — | — |
| 6LU7-ligand (N3) | — | — | −7.1 (3rd pose) | Phe140, Gly143, His163, His164, Glu166, Asp187, Thr190 |
Fig. 3Docking results of isolated compounds with SARS-CoV-2 Mpro (6LU7). (A) Validation of docking through redocking of the co-crystalized ligand N3 (gray) overlaid with the docked structure (pink). (B and C) Docking poses of the best compounds 6 (golden) and 5 (pink) respectively and their overlapping in (D). (E) Docking poses of 5 (pink) and 6 (golden) overlapped with co-crystalized ligand N3 (blue). (F) Docking poses of 6 (golden) and 10 (violet) comparing their binding modes.
Coulombic and Lennard-Jones interactions as well as total interaction energy of the complexes studied by MD
| Target | Complex | Energy (kJ mol−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coulombic interaction | Lennard-Jones (L-J) energy | Total interaction energy | ||
| Human elastase | 1H1B-chrysosplenetin (10) | −31.12 ± 3.7 | −84.81 ± 10 | −115.93 ± 10 |
| 1H1B-control | −20.36 ± 3.8 | −99.14 ± 6.0 | −119.50 ± 7.1 | |
| SARS-CoV-2 main protease | 6LU7-chrysosplenetin (10) | −24.29 ± 6.9 | −81.58 ± 17 | −105.87 ± 18 |
| 6LU7-control | −173.04 ± 5.2 | −249.57 ± 2.8 | −422.61 ± 5.9 | |
| 6LU7-jaceidin (6) | −43.72 ± 2.0 | −113.80 ± 1.7 | −157.52 ± 2.6 | |
Fig. 4RMSD plot of ligands heavy atoms in the active sites of (A), human elastase 1H1B and (B), SARS-CoV-2 main proteae 6LU7 during the production MD run.
Fig. 5Elastase enzymatic activity of compounds 6 to 10. Human neutrophils were incubated with fMLF/CB for 15 min. The elastase supernatant was obtained and incubated with DMSO (as control), or with compounds 6–10 (10 μM) for 2 min before the addition of substrate (100 μM). Elastase activity was measured at 405 nm. Data are presented as means ± S.E.M. (n = 4). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the control group (t-test).