Literature DB >> 35514944

Use of head camera-cued recall and debrief to externalise expertise: a systematic review of literature from multiple fields of practice.

Vivienne Isabella Blackhall1,2, Kenneth Grant Walker1,2, Iya Whiteley3, Philip Wilson4.   

Abstract

Background: The study of decision making in complex naturalistic environments poses several challenges. In response to these, video-stimulated cued-recall-debrief was developed. It involves an individual wearing a head-mounted camera which records a task from their point of view. Afterwards, footage captured is reviewed along with a facilitated debrief to help externalise cognitive processes. In theory, motion, audio and visual cues generate a high level of experiential immersion which helps the expert to articulate previously hidden thoughts and actions. Objective: To examine the current evidence for video-stimulated cued-recall-debrief as a means of explicating expert thoughts and feelings in complex tasks in a range of environments. Study selection: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Education Resources Information Center, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO and Google Scholar were searched for articles containing the key terms 'cued-recall (debrief)', 'decision making', 'skills' and 'video recording'. Studies were included if they examined the following outcomes: (1) feasibility, (2) extent of experiential immersion, (3) ability to generate unique insight into decision-making processes and (4) current applications. 1831 articles were identified initially, and 9 studies were included in the final review. Findings: Video-stimulated cued-recall-debrief is associated with a high level of experiential immersion and generates between two and four times the number of recollections compared with free recall. It can be used to build models of cognitive activity and to characterise the way in which more and less skilled individuals tend to think and feel. Conclusions: The technique could be used to explicate expertise within medicine: these insights into performance could be used as a training tool for other practitioners. Trial registration number: CRD42017057484. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; expert; recall debrief; skills

Year:  2018        PMID: 35514944      PMCID: PMC8936570          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  6 in total

1.  Using a head-mounted video camera to study clinical reasoning.

Authors:  C A Unsworth
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care.

Authors:  Niteesh K Choudhry; Robert H Fletcher; Stephen B Soumerai
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Using a head-mounted video camera to explore current conceptualizations of clinical reasoning in occupational therapy.

Authors:  Carolyn A Unsworth
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

4.  How and when do expert emergency physicians generate and evaluate diagnostic hypotheses? A qualitative study using head-mounted video cued-recall interviews.

Authors:  Thierry Pelaccia; Jacques Tardif; Emmanuel Triby; Christine Ammirati; Catherine Bertrand; Valérie Dory; Bernard Charlin
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 5.  Clinical reasoning in occupational therapy: an integrative review.

Authors:  B A Schell; R M Cervero
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1993-07

6.  Studying complex decision making in natural settings: using a head-mounted video camera to study competitive orienteering.

Authors:  M M Omodei; J McLennan
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1994-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.