| Literature DB >> 35513687 |
Anna Dzimitrowicz1, Magda Caban2, Dominik Terefinko3, Pawel Pohl3, Piotr Jamroz3, Weronika Babinska4, Piotr Cyganowski5, Piotr Stepnowski2, Ewa Lojkowska4, Wojciech Sledz4, Agata Motyka-Pomagruk4.
Abstract
Doxycycline (DOX), an antibiotic commonly used in medicine and veterinary, is frequently detected in natural waterways. Exposition of bacteria to DOX residuals poses a selective pressure leading to a common occurrence of DOX-resistance genetic determinants among microorganisms, including virulent human pathogens. In view of diminishment of the available therapeutic options, we developed a continuous-flow reaction-discharge system generating pulse-modulated radio-frequency atmospheric pressure glow discharge (pm-rf-APGD) intended for DOX removal from liquid solutions. A Design of Experiment and a Response Surface Methodology were implemented in the optimisation procedure. The removal efficiency of DOX equalling 79 ± 4.5% and the resultant degradation products were identified by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detection, Liquid Chromatography Quadruple Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry, Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry, total organic carbon, total nitrogen, Attenuated Total Reflectance Furrier Transform-Infrared, and UV/Vis-based methods. The pm-rf-APGD-treated DOX solution due to the generated Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species either lost its antimicrobial properties towards Escherichia coli ATCC25922 or significantly decreased biocidal activities by 37% and 29% in relation to Staphylococcus haemolyticus ATCC29970 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25904, respectively. Future implementation of this efficient and eco-friendly antibiotic-degradation technology into wastewater purification systems is predicted.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35513687 PMCID: PMC9072311 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11088-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) table for the response surface model developed to describe the effect of operating parameters of pulse-modulated radio-frequency atmospheric pressure glow discharge (pm-rf-APGD), i.e. A-DOX concentration in the flowing liquid electrode (FLE) solution (in µg mL−1), B-FLE solution flow rate (in mL min−1), and C-duty cycle for the pulse modulated radio-frequency alternating current, on temperature (T) of DOX-containing solutions treated by pm-rf-APGD.
| Source | Adj SS | Adj MS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 3 | 42.823 | 14.274 | 6.74 | 0.009 < 0.1 |
| Linear | 2 | 19.163 | 9.582 | 4.52 | 0.040 < 0.1 |
| A | 1 | 1.700 | 1.700 | 0.80 | 0.391 > 0.1 |
| B | 1 | 18.816 | 18.816 | 8.88 | 0.014 < 0.1 |
| Squared | 1 | 28.958 | 28.958 | 13.67 | 0.004 < 0.1 |
| B2 | 1 | 28.958 | 28.958 | 13,67 | 0.004 < 0.1 |
| Error | 10 | 21.191 | 2.119 | ||
| Lack-of-fit | 8 | 19.971 | 2.496 | 4.09 | 0.211 > 0.1 |
| Pure error | 2 | 1.220 | 0.610 | ||
| Total | 13 | 64.014 | |||
| Regression equation and model summary | |||||
| T (°C) = 0.710 – 1.80 × 10+1 × B + 1.68 × 10−1 × C – 2.91 × B2 | |||||
| S = 1.456, R2 = 66.9%, R2-adjusted = 57.0% | |||||
DF: Degrees of freedom. Adj SS: adjusted sums of squares. Adj MS: adjusted mean squares. F-value: the value of the Fisher–Snedecor test. P-value: probability value.
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) table for the response surface model developed to describe the effect of the operating parameters of the pulsed radio-frequency atmospheric pressure glow discharge (pm-rf-APGD), i.e., A-DOX concentration in the flowing liquid electrode (FLE) solution (in µg mL−1), B-FLE solution flow rate (in mL min−1), and C-duty cycle for the pulse-modulated radio-frequency alternating current, on pH of DOX-containing solutions treated by pm-rf- APGD.
| Source | Adj SS | Adj MS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 4 | 0.07919 | 0.01980 | 4.28 | 0.028 < 0.1 |
| Linear | 3 | 0.03732 | 0.01244 | 2.69 | 0.103 > 0.1 |
| A | 1 | 0.00211 | 0.00211 | 0.46 | 0.515 > 0.1 |
| B | 1 | 0.01901 | 0.01901 | 4.11 | 0.070 < 0.1 |
| C | 1 | 0.01620 | 0.01620 | 3.50 | 0.091 < 0.1 |
| Squared | 1 | 0.04186 | 0.04186 | 9.04 | 0.013 < 0.1 |
| A2 | 1 | 0.04186 | 0.04186 | 9.04 | 0.013 < 0.1 |
| Error | 10 | 0.04630 | 0.00463 | ||
| Lack-of-fit | 8 | 0.04024 | 0.00503 | 1.66 | 0.430 > 0.1 |
| Pure error | 2 | 0.00607 | 0.00303 | ||
| Total | 14 | 0.12549 | |||
| Regression equation and model summary | |||||
| pH = 3.235 – 5.39 × 10−3 × A + 4.87 × 10−2 × B – 4.50 × 10−3 × C + 5.20 × 10−5 × A2 | |||||
| S = 0.068, R2 = 63.1%, R2-adjusted = 48.3% | |||||
DF: Degrees of freedom. Adj SS: adjusted sums of squares. Adj MS: adjusted mean squares. F-value: the value of the Fisher–Snedecor test. P-value: probability value.
Bacterial strains of opportunistic human pathogens used in this study.
| Bacterial species | Strain nos | Cell morphology | Origin | Isolation | Other features | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATCC 25922 DSM 1103 CCUG 17620 | Gram (−) rod | Clinical isolate from human | 1946, USA | recommended reference strain for antibiotic susceptibility testing | [ | |
Newman NCTC 10833 ATCC 25904 | Gram (+) cocci | Secondary infection of tubercular osteomyelitis in human | 1952, UK | strong producer of coagulase | [ | |
ATCC 29970 DSM 20263 NCTC 11042 | Gram (+) cocci | Human skin | 1975, USA | Type strain | [ |
ATCC—American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, USA); NCTC—National Collection of Type Cultures (Porton Down, UK); CCUG—Culture Collection University of Gothenburg (Gothenburg, Sweden); DSMZ—German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (Brunswick, Germany).
Figure 1The residual plots for temperature (T) and pH, presenting the distribution of the analyzed residuals.
Figure 2The effect of the pm-rf-APGD operating parameters on temperature (T, °C) and pH of the pm-rf-APGD-treated solution (according to the Box-Behnken matrix presented in Table S1).
Figure 3The upper part—the total ion current chromatogram (TIC) of DOX (the untreated solution); the lower part—the corresponding TIC with the added chromatogram of the pm-rf-APGD-treated DOX solution.
Figure 4Antibacterial properties of the pm-rf-APGD-treated DOX solution in comparison to the non-plasma-treated control solution. A standard disc-diffusion assay was performed. Means ± standard errors of the measured bacterial growth inhibition diameters are depicted. Asterisks mark statistically significant differences (Welch Two Sample t-test at p < 0.05) between the antimicrobial actions of the CAPP-treated DOX solutions in contrast to the corresponding controls. The experiment was conducted three times with three technical repeats in each. The following bacterial strains were used: E. coli ATCC 25922, S. aureus ATCC 25904, and S. haemolyticus ATCC 29970. DOX – doxycycline. pm-rf-APGD – pulse-modulated radio-frequency atmospheric pressure glow discharge.
Figure 5The concentration of reactive nitrogen (a) and oxygen (b) species determined in the pm-rf-APGD-treated DOX solution in addition to the untreated DOX solution. Means ± standard errors of the measured concentrations of the reactive forms are given. Asterisks mark: statistically significant differences (one-way analysis of variance with the Tukey’s post-hoc test; ****p < 0.0001).