| Literature DB >> 35513343 |
Julian T C Wennmacher1,2, Soheil Mahmoudi3,4, Przemyslaw Rzepka1,2, Sung Sik Lee5, Tim Gruene3, Vladimir Paunović1,2, Jeroen A van Bokhoven1,2.
Abstract
Unveiling the coke formation in zeolites is an essential prerequisite for tackling the deactivation of these catalysts in the transformations of hydrocarbons. Herein, we present the direct mapping of coke in the micropores of ZSM-5 catalysts used in methanol-to-hydrocarbons conversion by single-crystal electron diffraction analysis. The latter technique revealed a polycyclic aromatic structure along the straight channel, wherein the high-quality data permit refinement of its occupancy to about 40 %. These findings were exploited to analyze the evolution of micropore coke during the reaction. Herein, coke-associated signals, which correlate with the activity loss, indicate that the nucleation of coke commences in the intersections of sinusoidal and straight channels, while the formation of coke in the straight pores occurs in the late stages of deactivation. The findings uncover an attractive method for analyzing coke deposition in the micropore domain.Entities:
Keywords: Catalysis; Coke Characterization; Deactivation; Electron Diffraction; Microporous Materials
Year: 2022 PMID: 35513343 PMCID: PMC9401574 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202205413
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 16.823
Textural, compositional, and crystallographic properties of ZSM‐5 catalysts in fresh form and after deactivation in MTH reaction.
|
Catalyst |
|
|
|
|
C:Sibulk [c]/ [mol mol−1] |
C:Sisurface [d]/ [mol mol−1] |
Lattice parameters[e] [Å] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
Z0h |
0.120 |
293 |
435 |
0 |
<0.01 |
0.14 |
20.096 |
19.912 |
13.398 |
0.184 |
|
Zc |
0.04 |
110 |
113 |
19.2 |
1.13 |
4.1 |
20.078 |
20.000 |
13.434 |
0.078 |
|
Z1h |
0.115 |
274 |
409 |
3.0 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
20.106 |
19.929 |
13.408 |
0.177 |
|
Z5h |
0.105 |
249 |
373 |
4.0 |
0.20 |
0.21 |
20.112 |
19.939 |
13.414 |
0.173 |
|
Z12h |
0.085 |
201 |
282 |
8.2 |
0.43 |
0.30 |
20.099 |
19.949 |
13.419 |
0.150 |
|
Z19.5h |
0.07 |
172 |
233 |
10.2 |
0.54 |
0.49 |
20.087 |
19.968 |
13.429 |
0.119 |
Determined by: [a] t‐plot and [b] BET methods, [c] TGA, [d] XPS, [e] PXRD and Pawley method.
Figure 1a) Distribution of coke‐associated signal in the zeolite unit cell as extracted from the direct electron diffraction maps of severely‐coked Zc catalyst. Views along the b) straight and c) sinusoidal channels. d) The most intense coke‐associated signals that protrude through the straight channel can be modelled as a molecule comprising three fused aromatic rings, with indicated bond lengths and angles. The crystallographically equivalent carbon and hydrogen atoms are colored in light orange and turquoise, respectively. Dashed lines indicate the possible hydrogen bonds. The tetrahedral (Al or Si) and oxygen framework sites are colored in green and white, respectively. Crystal orientation is indicated with respective coordinates. The straight and sinusoidal channels and their intersections are indicated with blue, red, and pink isosurfaces, respectively. The standardized signals for which I s>1 were considered as coke‐associated, and their intensity is indicated with a map shown above the panel a), which also applies to b) and c). The fraction of signals in different micropore sections is presented with a bar plot in a), in which the color code corresponds to the channel designations by isosurfaces.
Figure 2Distribution of the standardized coke‐associated signal in the zeolite unit cell as extracted from the direct electron diffraction maps in a) Z1h, b) Z5h, c) Z12h and d) Z19.5h catalysts. Framework atoms, micropore sections, signal intensities, and distribution are designated as detailed in the caption of Figure 1.