Ret Carlos J Rodriguez1, Anuradha Ganesan2,3,4, Faraz Shaikh2,3, M Leigh Carson2,3, William Bradley2,3, Tyler E Warkentien4, David R Tribble2. 1. John Peter Smith Hospital, Fort Worth, TX 76104, USA. 2. Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Preventive Medicine & Biostatistics Department, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. 3. Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA. 4. Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: During Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, an outbreak of combat-related invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) emerged among casualties with dismounted blast trauma and became a priority issue for the Military Health System. METHODS: In 2011, the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS) team led the Department of Defense IFI outbreak investigation to describe characteristics of IFIs among combat casualties and provide recommendations related to management of the disease. To support the outbreak investigation, existing IFI definitions and classifications utilized for immunocompromised patients were modified for use in epidemiologic research in a trauma population. Following the conclusion of the outbreak investigation, multiple retrospective analyses using a population of 77 IFI patients (injured during June 2009 to August 2011) were conducted to evaluate IFI epidemiology, wound microbiology, and diagnostics to support refinement of Joint Trauma System (JTS) clinical practice guidelines. Following cessation of combat operations in Afghanistan, the TIDOS database was comprehensively reviewed to identify patients with laboratory evidence of a fungal infection and refine the IFI classification scheme to incorporate timing of laboratory fungal evidence and include categories that denote a high or low level of suspicion for IFI. The refined IFI classification scheme was utilized in a large-scale epidemiologic assessment of casualties injured over a 5.5-year period. RESULTS: Among 720 combat casualties admitted to participating hospitals (2009-2014) who had histopathology and/or wound cultures collected, 94 (13%) met criteria for an IFI and 61 (8%) were classified as high suspicion of IFI. Risk factors for development of combat-related IFIs include sustaining a dismounted blast injury, experiencing a traumatic transfemoral amputation, and requiring resuscitation with large-volume (>20 units) blood transfusions. Moreover, TIDOS analyses demonstrated the adverse impact of IFIs on wound healing, particularly with order Mucorales. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay to identify filamentous fungi and support earlier IFI diagnosis was also assessed using archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. Although the PCR-based assay had high specificity (99%), there was low sensitivity (63%); however, sensitivity improved to 83% in tissues collected from sites with angioinvasion. Data obtained from the initial IFI outbreak investigation (37 IFI patients) and subsequent TIDOS analyses (77 IFI patients) supported development and refinement of a JTS clinical practice guideline for the management of IFIs in war wounds. Furthermore, a local clinical practice guideline to screen for early tissue-based evidence of IFIs among blast casualties at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center was critically evaluated through a TIDOS investigation, providing additional clinical practice support. Through a collaboration with the Uniformed Services University Surgical Critical Care Initiative, findings from TIDOS analyses were used to support development of a clinical decision support tool to facilitate early risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: Combat-related IFIs are a highly morbid complication following severe blast trauma and remain a threat for future modern warfare. Our findings have supported JTS clinical recommendations, refined IFI classification, and confirmed the utility of PCR-based assays as a complement to histopathology and/or culture to promote early diagnosis. Analyses underway or planned will add to the knowledge base of IFI epidemiology, diagnostics, prevention, and management. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2022. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
INTRODUCTION: During Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, an outbreak of combat-related invasive fungal wound infections (IFIs) emerged among casualties with dismounted blast trauma and became a priority issue for the Military Health System. METHODS: In 2011, the Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study (TIDOS) team led the Department of Defense IFI outbreak investigation to describe characteristics of IFIs among combat casualties and provide recommendations related to management of the disease. To support the outbreak investigation, existing IFI definitions and classifications utilized for immunocompromised patients were modified for use in epidemiologic research in a trauma population. Following the conclusion of the outbreak investigation, multiple retrospective analyses using a population of 77 IFI patients (injured during June 2009 to August 2011) were conducted to evaluate IFI epidemiology, wound microbiology, and diagnostics to support refinement of Joint Trauma System (JTS) clinical practice guidelines. Following cessation of combat operations in Afghanistan, the TIDOS database was comprehensively reviewed to identify patients with laboratory evidence of a fungal infection and refine the IFI classification scheme to incorporate timing of laboratory fungal evidence and include categories that denote a high or low level of suspicion for IFI. The refined IFI classification scheme was utilized in a large-scale epidemiologic assessment of casualties injured over a 5.5-year period. RESULTS: Among 720 combat casualties admitted to participating hospitals (2009-2014) who had histopathology and/or wound cultures collected, 94 (13%) met criteria for an IFI and 61 (8%) were classified as high suspicion of IFI. Risk factors for development of combat-related IFIs include sustaining a dismounted blast injury, experiencing a traumatic transfemoral amputation, and requiring resuscitation with large-volume (>20 units) blood transfusions. Moreover, TIDOS analyses demonstrated the adverse impact of IFIs on wound healing, particularly with order Mucorales. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assay to identify filamentous fungi and support earlier IFI diagnosis was also assessed using archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. Although the PCR-based assay had high specificity (99%), there was low sensitivity (63%); however, sensitivity improved to 83% in tissues collected from sites with angioinvasion. Data obtained from the initial IFI outbreak investigation (37 IFI patients) and subsequent TIDOS analyses (77 IFI patients) supported development and refinement of a JTS clinical practice guideline for the management of IFIs in war wounds. Furthermore, a local clinical practice guideline to screen for early tissue-based evidence of IFIs among blast casualties at the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center was critically evaluated through a TIDOS investigation, providing additional clinical practice support. Through a collaboration with the Uniformed Services University Surgical Critical Care Initiative, findings from TIDOS analyses were used to support development of a clinical decision support tool to facilitate early risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: Combat-related IFIs are a highly morbid complication following severe blast trauma and remain a threat for future modern warfare. Our findings have supported JTS clinical recommendations, refined IFI classification, and confirmed the utility of PCR-based assays as a complement to histopathology and/or culture to promote early diagnosis. Analyses underway or planned will add to the knowledge base of IFI epidemiology, diagnostics, prevention, and management. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2022. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.
Authors: Jason S Radowsky; Alan A Strawn; Jeffrey Sherwood; Adam Braden; William Liston Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: Tatjana P Calvano; Peter J Blatz; Todd J Vento; Brian L Wickes; Deanna A Sutton; Elizabeth H Thompson; Christopher E White; Evan M Renz; Duane R Hospenthal Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Carlos J Rodriguez; David R Tribble; Debra L Malone; Clinton K Murray; Elliot M Jessie; Mansoor Khan; Mark E Fleming; Benjamin K Potter; Wade T Gordon; Stacy A Shackelford Journal: Mil Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Tyler Warkentien; Carlos Rodriguez; Bradley Lloyd; Justin Wells; Amy Weintrob; James R Dunne; Anuradha Ganesan; Ping Li; William Bradley; Lakisha J Gaskins; Françoise Seillier-Moiseiwitsch; Clinton K Murray; Eugene V Millar; Bryan Keenan; Kristopher Paolino; Mark Fleming; Duane R Hospenthal; Glenn W Wortmann; Michael L Landrum; Mark G Kortepeter; David R Tribble Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Louis R Lewandowski; Amy C Weintrob; David R Tribble; Carlos J Rodriguez; Joseph Petfield; Bradley A Lloyd; Clinton K Murray; Daniel Stinner; Deepak Aggarwal; Faraz Shaikh; Benjamin K Potter Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Thomas A Mitchell; Mark O Hardin; Clinton K Murray; John D Ritchie; Leopoldo C Cancio; Evan M Renz; Christopher E White Journal: Burns Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 2.744
Authors: Marya D Zilberberg; Andrew F Shorr; Huan Huang; Paresh Chaudhari; Victoria Federico Paly; Joseph Menzin Journal: BMC Infect Dis Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 3.090
Authors: Katrin Mende; Kevin S Akers; Stuart D Tyner; Jason W Bennett; Mark P Simons; Dana M Blyth; Ping Li; Laveta Stewart; David R Tribble Journal: Mil Med Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 1.563
Authors: David R Tribble; Mary Ann Spott; Stacey A Shackleford; Jennifer M Gurney; Bg Clinton K Murray Journal: Mil Med Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 1.563