Svilena V Lazarova1, Mahsa Jessri1,2. 1. Food, Nutrition and Health Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hybrid methodologies have gained continuing interest as unique data reduction techniques for establishing a direct link between dietary exposures and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare partial least squares (PLS) and reduced rank regression (RRR) in identifying a dietary pattern associated with a high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in Canadian adults, construct PLS- and RRR-based simplified dietary patterns, and assess associations between the 4 dietary pattern scores and CVD risk. METHODS: Data were collected from 24-h dietary recalls of adult respondents in the 2 cycles of the nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)-Nutrition: CCHS 2004 linked to health administrative databases (n = 12,313) and CCHS 2015 (n = 14,020). Using 39 food groups, PLS and RRR were applied for identification of an energy-dense (ED), high-saturated-fat (HSF), and low-fiber-density (LFD) dietary pattern. Associations of the derived dietary pattern scores with lifestyle characteristics and CVD risk were examined using weighted multivariate regression and weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. RESULTS: PLS and RRR identified highly similar ED, HSF, and LFD dietary patterns with common high positive loadings for fast food, carbonated drinks, salty snacks, and solid fats, and high negative loadings for fruit, dark green vegetables, red and orange vegetables, other vegetables, whole grains, and legumes and soy (≥|0.17|). Food groups with the highest loadings were summed to form simplified pattern scores. Although the dietary patterns were not significantly associated with CVD risk, they were positively associated with 402-kcal/d higher energy intake (P-trends < 0.05) and higher obesity risk (PLS: OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.62, 2.70; RRR: OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.44, 2.17) (P-trends < 0.0001) in the fourth quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: PLS and RRR were shown to be equally effective for the derivation of a high-CVD-risk dietary pattern among Canadian adults. Further research is warranted on the role of major dietary components in cardiovascular health.
BACKGROUND: Hybrid methodologies have gained continuing interest as unique data reduction techniques for establishing a direct link between dietary exposures and clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare partial least squares (PLS) and reduced rank regression (RRR) in identifying a dietary pattern associated with a high cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in Canadian adults, construct PLS- and RRR-based simplified dietary patterns, and assess associations between the 4 dietary pattern scores and CVD risk. METHODS: Data were collected from 24-h dietary recalls of adult respondents in the 2 cycles of the nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)-Nutrition: CCHS 2004 linked to health administrative databases (n = 12,313) and CCHS 2015 (n = 14,020). Using 39 food groups, PLS and RRR were applied for identification of an energy-dense (ED), high-saturated-fat (HSF), and low-fiber-density (LFD) dietary pattern. Associations of the derived dietary pattern scores with lifestyle characteristics and CVD risk were examined using weighted multivariate regression and weighted multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, respectively. RESULTS: PLS and RRR identified highly similar ED, HSF, and LFD dietary patterns with common high positive loadings for fast food, carbonated drinks, salty snacks, and solid fats, and high negative loadings for fruit, dark green vegetables, red and orange vegetables, other vegetables, whole grains, and legumes and soy (≥|0.17|). Food groups with the highest loadings were summed to form simplified pattern scores. Although the dietary patterns were not significantly associated with CVD risk, they were positively associated with 402-kcal/d higher energy intake (P-trends < 0.05) and higher obesity risk (PLS: OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.62, 2.70; RRR: OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.44, 2.17) (P-trends < 0.0001) in the fourth quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: PLS and RRR were shown to be equally effective for the derivation of a high-CVD-risk dietary pattern among Canadian adults. Further research is warranted on the role of major dietary components in cardiovascular health.
Authors: Jenny H Ledikwe; Heidi M Blanck; Laura Kettel Khan; Mary K Serdula; Jennifer D Seymour; Beth C Tohill; Barbara J Rolls Journal: J Nutr Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: David J Johns; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Susan A Jebb; Lars Sjöström; Lena M S Carlsson; Gina L Ambrosini Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2015-04-10 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Gregory A Roth; George A Mensah; Catherine O Johnson; Giovanni Addolorato; Enrico Ammirati; Larry M Baddour; Noël C Barengo; Andrea Z Beaton; Emelia J Benjamin; Catherine P Benziger; Aimé Bonny; Michael Brauer; Marianne Brodmann; Thomas J Cahill; Jonathan Carapetis; Alberico L Catapano; Sumeet S Chugh; Leslie T Cooper; Josef Coresh; Michael Criqui; Nicole DeCleene; Kim A Eagle; Sophia Emmons-Bell; Valery L Feigin; Joaquim Fernández-Solà; Gerry Fowkes; Emmanuela Gakidou; Scott M Grundy; Feng J He; George Howard; Frank Hu; Lesley Inker; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Walter Koroshetz; Carl Lavie; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Hong S Lu; Antonio Mirijello; Awoke Misganaw Temesgen; Ali Mokdad; Andrew E Moran; Paul Muntner; Jagat Narula; Bruce Neal; Mpiko Ntsekhe; Glaucia Moraes de Oliveira; Catherine Otto; Mayowa Owolabi; Michael Pratt; Sanjay Rajagopalan; Marissa Reitsma; Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro; Nancy Rigotti; Anthony Rodgers; Craig Sable; Saate Shakil; Karen Sliwa-Hahnle; Benjamin Stark; Johan Sundström; Patrick Timpel; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marco Valgimigli; Theo Vos; Paul K Whelton; Magdi Yacoub; Liesl Zuhlke; Christopher Murray; Valentin Fuster Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2020-12-22 Impact factor: 24.094