Mahsa Jessri1, Russell D Wolfinger2,3, Wendy Y Lou4, Mary R L'Abbé5. 1. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, and. 2. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; and. 3. Scientific Discovery and Genomics, SAS Institute, Cary, NC. 4. Biostatistics Division, Canada Research Chair in Statistical Methods for Health Care, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 5. Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, and mary.labbe@utoronto.ca.
Abstract
Background: Analyzing the effects of dietary patterns is an important approach for examining the complex role of nutrition in the etiology of obesity and chronic diseases. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to characterize the dietary patterns of Canadians with the use of a priori, hybrid, and simplified dietary pattern techniques, and to compare the associations of these patterns with obesity risk in individuals with and without chronic diseases (unhealthy and healthy obesity).Design: Dietary recalls from 11,748 participants (≥18 y of age) in the cross-sectional, nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey 2.2 were used. A priori dietary pattern was characterized with the use of the previously validated 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans Adherence Index (DGAI). Weighted partial least squares (hybrid method) was used to derive an energy-dense (ED), high-fat (HF), low-fiber density (LFD) dietary pattern with the use of 38 food groups. The associations of derived dietary patterns with disease outcomes were then tested with the use of multinomial logistic regression. Results: An ED, HF, and LFD dietary pattern had high positive loadings for fast foods, carbonated drinks, and refined grains, and high negative loadings for whole fruits and vegetables (≥|0.17|). Food groups with a high loading were summed to form a simplified dietary pattern score. Moving from the first (healthiest) to the fourth (least healthy) quartiles of the ED, HF, and LFD pattern and the simplified dietary pattern scores was associated with increasingly elevated ORs for unhealthy obesity, with individuals in quartile 4 having an OR of 2.57 (95% CI: 1.75, 3.76) and 2.73 (95% CI: 1.88, 3.98), respectively (P-trend < 0.0001). Individuals who adhered the most to the 2015 DGAI recommendations (quartile 4) had a 53% lower OR of unhealthy obesity (P-trend < 0.0001). The associations of dietary patterns with healthy obesity and unhealthy nonobesity were weaker, albeit significant.Conclusions: Consuming an ED, HF, and LFD dietary pattern and lack of adherence to the recommendations of the 2015 DGAI were associated with a significantly higher risk of obesity with and without accompanying chronic diseases.
Background: Analyzing the effects of dietary patterns is an important approach for examining the complex role of nutrition in the etiology of obesity and chronic diseases. Objectives: The objectives of this study were to characterize the dietary patterns of Canadians with the use of a priori, hybrid, and simplified dietary pattern techniques, and to compare the associations of these patterns with obesity risk in individuals with and without chronic diseases (unhealthy and healthy obesity).Design: Dietary recalls from 11,748 participants (≥18 y of age) in the cross-sectional, nationally representative Canadian Community Health Survey 2.2 were used. A priori dietary pattern was characterized with the use of the previously validated 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans Adherence Index (DGAI). Weighted partial least squares (hybrid method) was used to derive an energy-dense (ED), high-fat (HF), low-fiber density (LFD) dietary pattern with the use of 38 food groups. The associations of derived dietary patterns with disease outcomes were then tested with the use of multinomial logistic regression. Results: An ED, HF, and LFD dietary pattern had high positive loadings for fast foods, carbonated drinks, and refined grains, and high negative loadings for whole fruits and vegetables (≥|0.17|). Food groups with a high loading were summed to form a simplified dietary pattern score. Moving from the first (healthiest) to the fourth (least healthy) quartiles of the ED, HF, and LFD pattern and the simplified dietary pattern scores was associated with increasingly elevated ORs for unhealthy obesity, with individuals in quartile 4 having an OR of 2.57 (95% CI: 1.75, 3.76) and 2.73 (95% CI: 1.88, 3.98), respectively (P-trend < 0.0001). Individuals who adhered the most to the 2015 DGAI recommendations (quartile 4) had a 53% lower OR of unhealthy obesity (P-trend < 0.0001). The associations of dietary patterns with healthy obesity and unhealthy nonobesity were weaker, albeit significant.Conclusions: Consuming an ED, HF, and LFD dietary pattern and lack of adherence to the recommendations of the 2015 DGAI were associated with a significantly higher risk of obesity with and without accompanying chronic diseases.
Authors: Carmen Pérez-Rodrigo; Marta Gianzo-Citores; Ángel Gil; Marcela González-Gross; Rosa M Ortega; Lluis Serra-Majem; Gregorio Varela-Moreiras; Javier Aranceta-Bartrina Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-06-14 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Vanessa DeClercq; Yunsong Cui; Cynthia Forbes; Scott A Grandy; Melanie Keats; Louise Parker; Ellen Sweeney; Zhijie Michael Yu; Trevor J B Dummer Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-10-21 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: José I Recio-Rodriguez; Manuel A Gómez-Marcos; Cristina Agudo-Conde; Ignasi Ramirez; Natividad Gonzalez-Viejo; Amparo Gomez-Arranz; Fernando Salcedo-Aguilar; Emiliano Rodriguez-Sanchez; Rosario Alonso-Domínguez; Natalia Sánchez-Aguadero; Jesus Gonzalez-Sanchez; Luis Garcia-Ortiz Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 1.889
Authors: Rodrigo San-Cristobal; Santiago Navas-Carretero; Katherine M Livingstone; Carlos Celis-Morales; Anna L Macready; Rosalind Fallaize; Clare B O'Donovan; Christina P Lambrinou; George Moschonis; Cyril F M Marsaux; Yannis Manios; Miroslaw Jarosz; Hannelore Daniel; Eileen R Gibney; Lorraine Brennan; Christian A Drevon; Thomas E Gundersen; Mike Gibney; Wim H M Saris; Julie A Lovegrove; Keith Grimaldi; Laurence D Parnell; Jildau Bouwman; Ben Van Ommen; John C Mathers; J Alfredo Martinez Journal: Nutrients Date: 2017-10-11 Impact factor: 5.717