Literature DB >> 3551088

A randomized control trial of cardiac rehabilitation.

A W Burgess, D J Lerner, R B D'Agostino, P S Vokonas, C R Hartman, P Gaccione.   

Abstract

A randomized trial using controls tested whether psycho-social rehabilitation of acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients would improve significantly their return to work rate and assessed the importance of various psychological, social, occupational, socio-demographic, and medical factors in facilitating or impeding rapid return to work. Eighty-nine patients were assigned randomly to participate in an experimental cardiac rehabilitation program (rehab care), and 91 patients were controls who received conventional hospital rehabilitation (usual care). By the first follow-up interview at three months, patients assigned to experimental treatment were significantly less distressed psychologically and less dependent on family support than controls (P = 0.04 and P = 0.05, respectively). By the final follow-up interview at 13 months, there was a marginally significant difference in favor of the experimental group in the frequency of reported deterrents to work resumption (P = 0.07). However, the intervention did not result in a statistically significant difference in the return to work rate (P greater than 0.10). In each group, 88% were back at work by approximately the first year after infarction. In addition, the two groups were similar in the amount of time patients remained out of the workforce (median days rehab care = 75, usual care = 81; P greater than 0.10). A multi-stage data analysis procedure utilizing the Cox regression technique indicated that while several independent variables had significant univariate associations with the length of time patients convalesced, outcome was most influenced by the patient's initial cardiological status and clinical course, by the patterns of family support, and by the several variables measuring the presence of obstacles to resuming work. Our findings suggest that rehabilitation programs intervening on multiple levels (psychological, social, occupational, and physical) may best meet the needs of chronically ill cardiac patients. Results indicate that implementing measures addressing the patient's general psycho-social adjustment to MI may improve existing programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3551088     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90154-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  10 in total

1.  The Angina-related Limitations at Work Questionnaire.

Authors:  D J Lerner; B C Amick; S Malspeis; W H Rogers; D R Gomes; D N Salem
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Influence of coronary nursing management follow up on lifestyle after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Carlsson; G Lindberg; L Westin; B Israelsson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Cognitive therapy for depression in patients with heart failure: a critical review.

Authors:  Rebecca L Dekker
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.179

4.  Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Janice Hegewald; Uta E Wegewitz; Ulrike Euler; Jaap L van Dijk; Jenny Adams; Alba Fishta; Philipp Heinrich; Andreas Seidler
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-14

Review 5.  Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Suzanne H Richards; Lindsey Anderson; Caroline E Jenkinson; Ben Whalley; Karen Rees; Philippa Davies; Paul Bennett; Zulian Liu; Robert West; David R Thompson; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-28

Review 6.  Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ben Whalley; David R Thompson; Rod S Taylor
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02

Review 7.  Comparative Effectiveness of the Core Components of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Mortality and Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nader N Kabboul; George Tomlinson; Troy A Francis; Sherry L Grace; Gabriela Chaves; Valeria Rac; Tamara Daou-Kabboul; Joanna M Bielecki; David A Alter; Murray Krahn
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease.

Authors:  K Rees; P Bennett; R West; Smith G Davey; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Psychological interventions for patients with coronary heart disease and their partners: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jane Reid; Chantal F Ski; David R Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Qualitative Analysis of Emotional Distress in Cardiac Patients From the Perspectives of Cognitive Behavioral and Metacognitive Theories: Why Might Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Have Limited Benefit, and Might Metacognitive Therapy Be More Effective?

Authors:  Rebecca McPhillips; Peter Salmon; Adrian Wells; Peter Fisher
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.