Literature DB >> 35508870

Clinical Devices for Bone Assessment.

Kay Raum1, Pascal Laugier2.   

Abstract

Although it has been over 30 years since the first recorded use of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) technology to predict bone strength, the field has not yet reached its maturity. Among several QUS technologies available to measure cortical or cancellous bone sites, at least some of them have demonstrated potential to predict fracture risk with an equivalent efficiency compared to X-ray densitometry techniques, and the advantages of being non-ionizing, inexpensive, portable, highly acceptable to patients and repeatable. In this Chapter, we review instrumental developments that have led to in vivo applications of bone QUS, emphasizing the developments occurred in the decade 2010-2020. While several proposals have been made for practical clinical use, there are various critical issues that still need to be addressed, such as quality control and standardization. On the other side, although still at an early stage of development, recent QUS approaches to assess bone quality factors seem promising. These include guided waves to assess mechanical and structural properties of long cortical bones or new QUS technologies adapted to measure the major fracture sites (hip and spine). New data acquisition and signal processing procedures are prone to reveal bone properties beyond bone mineral quantity and to provide a more accurate assessment of bone strength.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attenuation; Axial transmission; Cortical bone; Speed of sound; Trabecular bone; Transverse transmission

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35508870     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-91979-5_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  73 in total

1.  Diagnostic agreement of two calcaneal ultrasound devices: the Sahara bone sonometer and the Achilles+.

Authors:  F E Alenfeld; K Engelke; D Schmidt; M Brezger; E Diessel; D Felsenberg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: a 2D simulation study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bossy; Maryline Talmant; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Bidirectional axial transmission can improve accuracy and precision of ultrasonic velocity measurement in cortical bone: a validation on test materials.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bossy; Maryline Talmant; Marielle Defontaine; Frédéric Patat; Pascal Laugier
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Negative dispersion in bone: the role of interference in measurements of the apparent phase velocity of two temporally overlapping signals.

Authors:  Adam Q Bauer; Karen R Marutyan; Mark R Holland; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The Bindex(®) ultrasound device: reliability of cortical bone thickness measures and their relationship to regional bone mineral density.

Authors:  Martin Behrens; Sabine Felser; Anett Mau-Moeller; Matthias Weippert; Johannes Pollex; Ralf Skripitz; Philipp K E Herlyn; Dagmar-C Fischer; Sven Bruhn; Hans-Christof Schober; Volker Zschorlich; Thomas Mittlmeier
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  Radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry for the prediction of incident fragility fractures: A 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Giovanni Arioli; Gerolamo Bianchi; Maria Luisa Brandi; Carla Caffarelli; Luisella Cianferotti; Davide Gatti; Giuseppe Girasole; Stefano Gonnelli; Monica Manfredini; Maurizio Muratore; Eugenio Quarta; Laura Quarta
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Fracture risk and height: an association partly accounted for by cortical porosity of relatively thinner cortices.

Authors:  Åshild Bjørnerem; Quang Minh Bui; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; John L Hopper; Roger Zebaze; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Interference between wave modes may contribute to the apparent negative dispersion observed in cancellous bone.

Authors:  Christian C Anderson; Karen R Marutyan; Mark R Holland; Keith A Wear; James G Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Femur ultrasound (FemUS)--first clinical results on hip fracture discrimination and estimation of femoral BMD.

Authors:  R Barkmann; S Dencks; P Laugier; F Padilla; K Brixen; J Ryg; A Seekamp; L Mahlke; A Bremer; M Heller; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Cortical porosity identifies women with osteopenia at increased risk for forearm fractures.

Authors:  Yohann Bala; Roger Zebaze; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Sandra Iuliano; James M Peterson; Shreyasee Amin; Åshild Bjørnerem; L Joseph Melton; Helena Johansson; John A Kanis; Sundeep Khosla; Ego Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.