Literature DB >> 35508548

Is a preoperative pathogen detection a prerequisite before undergoing one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection of the hip?

Daniel Karczewski1, Yannick Seutz2, Christian Hipfl2, Doruk Akgün2, Octavian Andronic3, Carsten Perka2, Sebastian Hardt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A preoperative pathogen detection is considered a prerequisite before undergoing one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) according to most guidelines. This study compares patients with and without preoperative pathogen detection undergoing one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip. The authors put up the hypothesis that a preoperative pathogen detection is no prerequisite in selected cases undergoing one-stage exchange.
METHODS: 30 consecutive patients with PJI of the hip, treated with one-stage exchange, between 2011 and 2021, were retrospectively included. Mean age was 70 years and mean follow-up 2.1 ± 1.8 years. PJI was defined according to the European Bone and Joint Infection Society. One-stage exchange was performed in (1) chronic PJI longer than 4 weeks, (2) well-retained bone condition, (3) absence of multiple prior revisions for PJI (≤ 2) with absence of difficult-to-treat pathogens in the past, and (4) necessity/preference for early mobility due to comorbidities/age.
RESULTS: One-stage exchange was performed in 20 patients with and in 10 without a preoperative pathogen detection. Age (71 years, 68 years, p = 0.519), sex (50% and 30% males, p = 0.440), American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (2.2, 2.4, p = 0.502), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (3, 4, p = 0.530) did not differ among the two groups. No significant differences were noted concerning preoperative CRP (15 mg/l, 43 mg/l, p = 0.228), synovial cell count (15.990/nl, 5.308/nl, p = 0.887), radiological signs of loosening (55%, 50%, p = 0.999), and intraoperative histopathology. Except a higher rate of coagulase-negative staphylococci (70%, 20%, p = 0.019) in patients with a preoperative pathogen detection, no significant differences in pathogen spectrum were identified among groups. Revision for PJI recurrence was performed in one patient with an initial preoperative pathogen detection (3.3%). Additional revisions were performed for dislocation in two and postoperative hematoma in one patient. Revision rate for both septic and aseptic causes (p = 0.999), stay in hospital (16 and 15 days, p = 0.373) and modified Harris Hip Score (60, 71, p = 0.350) did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSION: Patients with and without a preoperative pathogen detection did not show significant differences concerning baseline characteristics, clinical and functional outcomes at 2 years. An absent preoperative pathogen detection is no absolute contraindication for one-stage exchange in chronic PJI, if involving good bone quality and absence of multiple prior revisions.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culture negative; One-stage exchange; PJI; Pathogen detection

Year:  2022        PMID: 35508548     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04459-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  33 in total

Review 1.  Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Demographics and Management.

Authors:  Christopher E Gross; Craig J Della Valle; James C Rex; Sophia A Traven; Elizabeth C Durante
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  One-stage exchange: it all began here.

Authors:  T Gehrke; A Zahar; D Kendoff
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  One-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty: A Surgical Technique Update.

Authors:  David A George; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  The Role of One-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Matthew J Donaldson; Jurek R Pietrzak; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

5.  Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Douglas R Osmon; Elie F Berbari; Anthony R Berendt; Daniel Lew; Werner Zimmerli; James M Steckelberg; Nalini Rao; Arlen Hanssen; Walter R Wilson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Outcome of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infections caused by pathogens resistant to biofilm-active antibiotics: results from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Doruk Akgün; Carsten Perka; Andrej Trampuz; Nora Renz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Indications for a single-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review.

Authors:  R R Thakrar; S Horriat; B Kayani; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: safety and efficacy of two stage versus one stage exchange arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joseph R Palmer; Tejbir S Pannu; Jesus M Villa; Jorge Manrique; Aldo M Riesgo; Carlos A Higuera
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 9.  Re-Infection Outcomes following One- and Two-Stage Surgical Revision of Infected Hip Prosthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Setor K Kunutsor; Michael R Whitehouse; Ashley W Blom; Andrew D Beswick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections?

Authors:  Fares Sami Haddad; Mohamed Sukeik; Sulaiman Alazzawi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.