Literature DB >> 33267978

Fungal Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Demographics and Management.

Christopher E Gross1, Craig J Della Valle2, James C Rex1, Sophia A Traven1, Elizabeth C Durante1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most feared complications of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Although commonly the result of colonization by Staphylococcal species, a growing number of cases of PJI with fungal pathogens have been reported within the last decade. Although standard treatment with two-stage exchange mirrors that of bacterial PJI, the variability in virulence between fungal species makes for an unpredictable and challenging treatment course.
METHODS: A review of Pubmed and Scopus from years 2009 to 2019 was conducted with the search terms fungal, infection, Candida, arthroplasty, periprosthetic, and prosthesis. Publications were reviewed and screened, yielding data for 286 patients with fungal PJI in the hip, knee, shoulder, and elbow prosthetics.
RESULTS: Patient comorbidities generally included conditions impairing wound healing and immune response such as diabetes mellitus. Candida species were the most common fungal pathogens identified (85%); 30% had a concomitant bacterial infection. A two-stage exchange was most utilized, with a mean success rate of 65%. Antifungal impregnated spacers were utilized in 82 cases, with a comparatively high success rate (81%). Attempts at debridement with implant retention had substantially lower cure rates (15%).
CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage exchange is the favored approach to treating fungal PJI. Debridement with implant retention does not appear adequate to control infection, and retrieval of implanted materials should be prioritized. The use of antifungal impregnated spacers is an important area of ongoing research, with uncertainty regarding the type and quantity of antifungal agent to incorporate, although recent reports support the use of these agents.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty; fungal; infection; joint; periprosthetic

Year:  2020        PMID: 33267978     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Is a preoperative pathogen detection a prerequisite before undergoing one-stage exchange for prosthetic joint infection of the hip?

Authors:  Daniel Karczewski; Yannick Seutz; Christian Hipfl; Doruk Akgün; Octavian Andronic; Carsten Perka; Sebastian Hardt
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Molecular Approach for the Laboratory Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Giulia Gatti; Francesca Taddei; Martina Brandolini; Andrea Mancini; Agnese Denicolò; Francesco Congestrì; Martina Manera; Valentina Arfilli; Arianna Battisti; Silvia Zannoli; Maria Michela Marino; Anna Marzucco; Manuela Morotti; Laura Grumiro; Agata Scalcione; Giorgio Dirani; Monica Cricca; Vittorio Sambri
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-08-05

Review 3.  Periprosthetic Joint Infections Caused by Candida Species-A Single-Center Experience and Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dariusz Grzelecki; Aleksandra Grajek; Piotr Dudek; Łukasz Olewnik; Nicol Zielinska; Petr Fulin; Maria Czubak-Wrzosek; Marcin Tyrakowski; Dariusz Marczak; Jacek Kowalczewski
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.