Literature DB >> 35503120

2D pelvic floor ultrasound imaging in identifying levator ani muscle trauma agrees highly with 4D ultrasound imaging.

Martina Kreft1, Peiying Cai2, Eva Furrer3, Anne Richter4, Roland Zimmermann4, Nina Kimmich4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the agreement between 2D and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS) technique in showing levator ani muscle (LAM) states after vaginal birth.
METHODS: In a prospective observational cohort study between March 2017 and April 2019 we evaluated LAM states (intact, hematoma, partial, complete avulsion) of primiparous women having given birth vaginally with singletons in vertex presentation ≥ 36+0 gestational weeks by using 2D and 4D TLUS within 1-4 days postpartum (assessment A1) and again 6-10 weeks postpartum (assessment A2). Cohen's Kappa analysis was performed for each side separately to evaluate the test agreement between the two ultrasound techniques at every assessment period.
RESULTS: A total of 224 women participated at A1 and 213 at A2. The agreement between the two ultrasound techniques was good to very good at A1 (Cohen`s kappa right-sided 0.78, left-sided 0.82) and very good at A2 (Cohen`s kappa both sides 0.88). The agreement was best when assessing an intact LAM or a complete avulsion (Cohen`s kappa between 0.78-0.92 for complete avulsions).
CONCLUSIONS: The comparison between 2D and 4D TLUS showed a good to very good agreement in LAM trauma immediately after birth as well as 6-10 weeks postpartum. Therefore, 2D ultrasound could also be a valuable method for demonstrating a LAM abnormality and could be used in settings where 3D/4D ultrasound equipment is not available.
© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D and 4D translabial ultrasound; Avulsion; Levator ani; Pelvic floor; Vaginal birth

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35503120     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05198-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   1.932


  5 in total

1.  Comparison between transperineal ultrasound and digital detection of levator ani trauma. Can we improve the odds?

Authors:  Jennifer A Kruger; Hans Peter Dietz; Stephanie C Budgett; Chantale L Dumoulin
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  2D pelvic floor ultrasound imaging in identifying levator ani muscle trauma agrees highly with 4D ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Martina Kreft; Peiying Cai; Eva Furrer; Anne Richter; Roland Zimmermann; Nina Kimmich
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.932

3.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability for diagnosing levator ani changes on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  K Lammers; K B Kluivers; M E Vierhout; M Prokop; J J Fütterer
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Validity and reproducibility of the digital detection of levator trauma.

Authors:  H P Dietz; C Shek
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-02-13

5.  Levator ani muscle avulsion: Digital palpation versus tomographic ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Ixora Kamisan Atan; Sylvia Lin; Hans Peter Dietz; Peter Herbison; Peter Donald Wilson
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.561

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  2D pelvic floor ultrasound imaging in identifying levator ani muscle trauma agrees highly with 4D ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Martina Kreft; Peiying Cai; Eva Furrer; Anne Richter; Roland Zimmermann; Nina Kimmich
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.932

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.